Literature DB >> 9618775

Sample size requirements for the comparison of two or more coefficients of inter-observer agreement.

A Donner1.   

Abstract

I provide sample size formulae and tables for the design of studies that compare two or more coefficients of inter-observer agreement or concordance. Such studies may arise, for example, when interest centres on assessment of how measures of inter-observer agreement vary across different patient subgroups or treatment centres. I consider cases of both a continuous and a dichotomous outcome measure. Three examples illustrate the results.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9618775     DOI: 10.1002/(sici)1097-0258(19980530)17:10<1157::aid-sim792>3.0.co;2-w

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Stat Med        ISSN: 0277-6715            Impact factor:   2.373


  13 in total

Review 1.  Fear or favour? Statistics in pathology.

Authors:  A Wade
Journal:  J Clin Pathol       Date:  2000-01       Impact factor: 3.411

2.  [Estimate of the sample size].

Authors:  L M Vaquero Roncero; M B Sánchez-Montero
Journal:  Aten Primaria       Date:  2000 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 1.137

3.  A parent-completed respiratory questionnaire for 1-year-old children: repeatability.

Authors:  Marie-Pierre F Strippoli; Michael Silverman; Gisela Michel; Claudia E Kuehni
Journal:  Arch Dis Child       Date:  2007-05-14       Impact factor: 3.791

4.  Sample size requirements for training to a kappa agreement criterion on clinical dementia ratings.

Authors:  Rochelle E Tractenberg; Futoshi Yumoto; Shelia Jin; John C Morris
Journal:  Alzheimer Dis Assoc Disord       Date:  2010 Jul-Sep       Impact factor: 2.703

5.  The relationship between administered radiopharmaceutical activity in myocardial perfusion scintigraphy and imaging outcome.

Authors:  C N Robinson; A van Aswegen; S A Julious; T O Nunan; W H Thomson; W B Tindale; D A Tout; S R Underwood
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2007-10-10       Impact factor: 9.236

6.  The interactive computer interview for mania.

Authors:  Noreen A Reilly-Harrington; Daniel DeBonis; Andrew C Leon; Louisa Sylvia; Roy Perlis; Daniel Lewis; Gary S Sachs
Journal:  Bipolar Disord       Date:  2010-08       Impact factor: 6.744

7.  Statistical validation of image segmentation quality based on a spatial overlap index.

Authors:  Kelly H Zou; Simon K Warfield; Aditya Bharatha; Clare M C Tempany; Michael R Kaus; Steven J Haker; William M Wells; Ferenc A Jolesz; Ron Kikinis
Journal:  Acad Radiol       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 3.173

8.  Internet- vs. telephone-administered questionnaires in a randomized trial of smoking cessation.

Authors:  Amanda L Graham; George D Papandonatos; Beth C Bock; Nathan K Cobb; Arielle Baskin-Sommers; Raymond Niaura; David B Abrams
Journal:  Nicotine Tob Res       Date:  2006-12       Impact factor: 4.244

9.  Effect of rater training on the reliability of technical skill assessments: a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Reagan L Robertson; Ashley Vergis; Lawrence M Gillman; Jason Park
Journal:  Can J Surg       Date:  2018-10-01       Impact factor: 2.089

10.  Design and testing of a tool for evaluating the quality of diabetes consumer-information Web sites.

Authors:  Joshua J Seidman; Donald Steinwachs; Haya R Rubin
Journal:  J Med Internet Res       Date:  2003-11-27       Impact factor: 5.428

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.