Literature DB >> 20473138

Sample size requirements for training to a kappa agreement criterion on clinical dementia ratings.

Rochelle E Tractenberg1, Futoshi Yumoto, Shelia Jin, John C Morris.   

Abstract

The Clinical Dementia Rating (CDR) is a valid and reliable global measure of dementia severity. Diagnosis and transition across stages hinge on its consistent administration. Reports of CDR ratings reliability have been based on 1 or 2 test cases at each severity level; agreement (kappa) statistics based on so few rated cases have large error, and confidence intervals are incorrect. Simulations varied the number of test cases, and their distribution across CDR stage; to derive the sample size yielding a 95% confidence that estimated is at least 0.60. We found that testing raters on 5 or more patients per CDR level (total N=25) will yield the desired confidence in estimated kappa, and if the test involves greater representation of CDR stages that are harder to evaluate, at least 42 ratings are needed. Testing newly trained raters with at least 5 patients per CDR stage will provide valid estimation of rater consistency, given the point estimate for kappa is roughly 0.80; fewer test cases increases the standard error and unequal distribution of test cases across CDR stages will lower kappa and increase error.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20473138      PMCID: PMC2924444          DOI: 10.1097/WAD.0b013e3181d489c6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Alzheimer Dis Assoc Disord        ISSN: 0893-0341            Impact factor:   2.703


  13 in total

1.  Interobserver disagreements on clinical dementia rating assessment: interpretation and implications for training.

Authors:  R E Tractenberg; K Schafer; J C Morris
Journal:  Alzheimer Dis Assoc Disord       Date:  2001 Jul-Sep       Impact factor: 2.703

2.  Inference procedures for assessing interobserver agreement among multiple raters.

Authors:  M Altaye; A Donner; N Klar
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  2001-06       Impact factor: 2.571

3.  A goodness-of-fit approach to inference procedures for the kappa statistic: confidence interval construction, significance-testing and sample size estimation.

Authors:  A Donner; M Eliasziw
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  1992-08       Impact factor: 2.373

4.  Reliability of clinical nurse specialists in the staging of dementia.

Authors:  M M McCulla; M Coats; N Van Fleet; J Duchek; E Grant; J C Morris
Journal:  Arch Neurol       Date:  1989-11

5.  Effective number of subjects and number of raters for inter-rater reliability studies.

Authors:  Yuki Saito; Takashi Sozu; Chikuma Hamada; Isao Yoshimura
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2006-05-15       Impact factor: 2.373

6.  Sample size requirements for the comparison of two or more coefficients of inter-observer agreement.

Authors:  A Donner
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  1998-05-30       Impact factor: 2.373

7.  Sample size and optimal designs for reliability studies.

Authors:  S D Walter; M Eliasziw; A Donner
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  1998-01-15       Impact factor: 2.373

8.  Reliability of monitoring the clinical dementia rating in multicenter clinical trials.

Authors:  Kimberly A Schafer; Rochelle E Tractenberg; Mary Sano; Joan A Mackell; Ronald G Thomas; Anthony Gamst; Leon J Thal; John C Morris
Journal:  Alzheimer Dis Assoc Disord       Date:  2004 Oct-Dec       Impact factor: 2.703

9.  The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data.

Authors:  J R Landis; G G Koch
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  1977-03       Impact factor: 2.571

10.  The Clinical Dementia Rating (CDR): current version and scoring rules.

Authors:  J C Morris
Journal:  Neurology       Date:  1993-11       Impact factor: 9.910

View more
  7 in total

1.  Comparison of three-dimensional and two-dimensional computed tomographies in the classification of acetabular fractures.

Authors:  Thanat Kanthawang; Tanawat Vaseenon; Patumrat Sripan; Nuttaya Pattamapaspong
Journal:  Emerg Radiol       Date:  2019-12-02

2.  The relationship between functional status and judgment/problem solving among individuals with dementia.

Authors:  Ann M Mayo; Margaret Wallhagen; Bruce A Cooper; Kala Mehta; Leslie Ross; Bruce Miller
Journal:  Int J Geriatr Psychiatry       Date:  2012-07-12       Impact factor: 3.485

3.  Reliability and validity test of a novel three-dimensional acetabular bone defect classification system aided with additive manufacturing.

Authors:  Jingwei Zhang; Yi Hu; Hua Ying; Yuanqing Mao; Zhenan Zhu; Huiwu Li
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2022-05-09       Impact factor: 2.562

4.  Evaluation of first information reports of Delhi police for injury surveillance: Data extraction tool development & validation.

Authors:  Sajjan Singh Yadav; Phil Edwards; John Porter
Journal:  Indian J Med Res       Date:  2020-10       Impact factor: 2.375

5.  Globalization of Alzheimer's disease clinical trials.

Authors:  Jeffrey Cummings; Robert Reynders; Kate Zhong
Journal:  Alzheimers Res Ther       Date:  2011-08-17       Impact factor: 6.982

6.  How well do public sector primary care providers function as medical generalists in Cape Town: a descriptive survey.

Authors:  Renaldo Christoffels; Bob Mash
Journal:  BMC Fam Pract       Date:  2018-07-19       Impact factor: 2.497

7.  Aducanumab: Appropriate Use Recommendations.

Authors:  J Cummings; P Aisen; L G Apostolova; A Atri; S Salloway; M Weiner
Journal:  J Prev Alzheimers Dis       Date:  2021
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.