Literature DB >> 9616104

Comparisons of three probability formulae for parentage exclusion.

A Jamieson, S C Taylor.   

Abstract

Three general formulae calibrate the average capability of marker systems to dispute falsely reported pedigree records in uniparous species. The most familiar exclusion formula applies to paternity, although the same formula applies equally to maternity. Another formula faults the relationship of a single offspring with its putative parent; for example, where the genotype of the other parent is not available. The remaining formulae excludes both of the falsely recorded parents of a substituted offspring. Simplified forms of the three general formulae facilitate the calculation of maximal average exclusion values over a range of hypothetical markers. Allele frequency data on eight marker systems in horses provide practical examples. The exclusion values of the three formulae are compared.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9616104     DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2052.1997.00186.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Anim Genet        ISSN: 0268-9146            Impact factor:   3.169


  44 in total

1.  Two-generation analysis of pollen flow across a landscape. IV. Estimating the dispersal parameter.

Authors:  Frédéric Austerlitz; Peter E Smouse
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2002-05       Impact factor: 4.562

2.  Power of exclusion revisited: probability of excluding relatives of the true father from paternity.

Authors:  Wing K Fung; Yuk-ka Chung; Dart-man Wong
Journal:  Int J Legal Med       Date:  2002-04       Impact factor: 2.686

3.  Microsatellite-based parentage analysis of Aedes aegypti (Diptera: Culicidae) using nonlethal DNA sampling.

Authors:  Jacklyn Wong; Yui Yin Chu; Steven T Stoddard; Yoosook Lee; Amy C Morrison; Thomas W Scott
Journal:  J Med Entomol       Date:  2012-01       Impact factor: 2.278

4.  Disentangling fetal and maternal susceptibility for pre-eclampsia: a British multicenter candidate-gene study.

Authors: 
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  2005-05-11       Impact factor: 11.025

5.  Adaptive genetic complementarity in mate choice coexists with selection for elaborate sexual traits.

Authors:  Kevin P Oh; Alexander V Badyaev
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2006-08-07       Impact factor: 5.349

6.  The snail's love-dart delivers mucus to increase paternity.

Authors:  Ronald Chase; Katrina C Blanchard
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2006-06-22       Impact factor: 5.349

7.  Pedigree-free animal models: the relatedness matrix reloaded.

Authors:  Francesca D Frentiu; Sonya M Clegg; John Chittock; Terry Burke; Mark W Blows; Ian P F Owens
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2008-03-22       Impact factor: 5.349

8.  The effects of inbreeding, genetic dissimilarity and phenotype on male reproductive success in a dioecious plant.

Authors:  Frédéric Austerlitz; Gabriela Gleiser; Sara Teixeira; Giorgina Bernasconi
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2011-05-11       Impact factor: 5.349

9.  Genetic parentage in large half-sib clutches: theoretical estimates and empirical appraisals.

Authors:  J A DeWoody; D Walker; J C Avise
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2000-04       Impact factor: 4.562

10.  Inheritance of nesting behaviour across natural environmental variation in a turtle with temperature-dependent sex determination.

Authors:  Suzanne E McGaugh; Lisa E Schwanz; Rachel M Bowden; Julie E Gonzalez; Fredric J Janzen
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2009-12-16       Impact factor: 5.349

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.