Literature DB >> 12056522

Power of exclusion revisited: probability of excluding relatives of the true father from paternity.

Wing K Fung1, Yuk-ka Chung, Dart-man Wong.   

Abstract

In parentage testing using DNA markers, the formulae for calculating the probability of exclusion generally overstate the power of a test battery by considering its ability to exclude a random man. It is known that in many cases, in particular immigration applications, the false father is more likely to be a relative, e.g. brother, of the true father than an unrelated man. This work presents formulae that take this consideration into account. A practical example using Hong Kong data is provided to illustrate the effect of the modification. Also discussed is how the expected efficacy of a test battery will be affected when possible mutations and null alleles or genetic inconsistencies are taken into consideration.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12056522     DOI: 10.1007/s004140100210

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Legal Med        ISSN: 0937-9827            Impact factor:   2.686


  10 in total

1.  The evidential value of STRs. An analysis of exclusion cases.

Authors:  B Brinkmann; H Pfeiffer; M Schürenkamp; C Hohoff
Journal:  Int J Legal Med       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 2.686

2.  Population data for 12 STR loci in Hong Kong Chinese.

Authors:  D M Wong; M Y Law; W K Fung; K L Chan; C Li; T S Lun; K M Lai; K Y Cheung; C T Chiu
Journal:  Int J Legal Med       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 2.686

3.  Comparisons of three probability formulae for parentage exclusion.

Authors:  A Jamieson; S C Taylor
Journal:  Anim Genet       Date:  1997-12       Impact factor: 3.169

4.  Paternity exclusion by DNA markers: effects of paternal mutations.

Authors:  R Chakraborty; D N Stivers
Journal:  J Forensic Sci       Date:  1996-07       Impact factor: 1.832

5.  Exclusion of paternity: the current state of the art.

Authors:  R Chakraborty; M Shaw; W J Schull
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  1974-07       Impact factor: 11.025

6.  DNA analysis in disputed parentage: the occurrence of two apparently false exclusions of paternity, both at short tandem repeat (STR) loci, in the one child.

Authors:  P R Gunn; K Trueman; P Stapleton; D B Klarkowski
Journal:  Electrophoresis       Date:  1997-08       Impact factor: 3.535

7.  A simple method for calculating the probability of excluding paternity with any number of codominant alleles.

Authors:  Y Ohno; I M Sebetan; S Akaishi
Journal:  Forensic Sci Int       Date:  1982 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 2.395

8.  Exclusion of paternity without testing the mother.

Authors:  C L Lee; L Lebeck; M Pothiawala
Journal:  Am J Clin Pathol       Date:  1980-12       Impact factor: 2.493

9.  Probability of paternity exclusion when relatives are involved.

Authors:  D B Salmon; J Brocteur
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  1978-01       Impact factor: 11.025

10.  Determination of sibship in any two persons.

Authors:  R E Wenk; M Traver; F A Chiafari
Journal:  Transfusion       Date:  1996-03       Impact factor: 3.157

  10 in total
  9 in total

1.  It was one of my brothers.

Authors:  Amy D Anderson; Bruce S Weir
Journal:  Int J Legal Med       Date:  2005-08-25       Impact factor: 2.686

2.  The power of single-nucleotide polymorphisms for large-scale parentage inference.

Authors:  Eric C Anderson; John Carlos Garza
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2005-12-30       Impact factor: 4.562

3.  Two brothers' alleged paternity for a child: who is the father?

Authors:  Muhammed Dogan; Umut Kara; Ramazan Emre; Wing Kam Fung; Kemal Murat Canturk
Journal:  Mol Biol Rep       Date:  2014-11-22       Impact factor: 2.316

4.  Heterozygosity assessment of five STR loci located at 5q13 region for preimplantation genetic diagnosis of spinal muscular atrophy.

Authors:  Asghar Korzebor; Pupak Derakhshandeh-Peykar; Mohsen Meshkani; Azadeh Hoseini; Maryam Rafati; Marzieh Purhoseini; Saeed Reza Ghaffari
Journal:  Mol Biol Rep       Date:  2012-11-07       Impact factor: 2.316

5.  Use of prior odds for missing persons identifications.

Authors:  Bruce Budowle; Jianye Ge; Ranajit Chakraborty; Harrell Gill-King
Journal:  Investig Genet       Date:  2011-06-27

6.  Testing of microsatellite multiplexes for individual identification of Cape Parrots (Poicephalus robustus): paternity testing and monitoring trade.

Authors:  Willem G Coetzer; Colleen T Downs; Mike R Perrin; Sandi Willows-Munro
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2017-03-21       Impact factor: 2.984

7.  Development and validation of a novel panel of 16 STR markers for simultaneous diagnosis of β-thalassemia, aneuploidy screening, maternal cell contamination detection and fetal sample authenticity in PND and PGD/PGS cases.

Authors:  Zohreh Sharifi; Faezeh Rahiminejad; Atefeh Joudaki; Ameneh Sarhadi Bandehi; Hossein Farahzadi; Yeganeh Keshvar; Fatemeh Golnabi; Sanaz Naderi; Rasaneh Yazdani; Mehdi Shafaat; Shirin Ghadami; Maryam Abiri; Sirous Zeinali
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2019-05-15       Impact factor: 4.379

8.  The risk of false inclusion of a relative in parentage testing - an in silico population study.

Authors:  James Chun-I Lee; Li-Chin Tsai; Pao-Ching Chu; Yen-Yang Lin; Chun-Yen Lin; Tsun-Ying Huang; Yu-Jen Yu; Adrian Linacre; Hsing-Mei Hsieh
Journal:  Croat Med J       Date:  2013-06       Impact factor: 1.351

9.  De novo SNP discovery in the Scandinavian brown bear (Ursus arctos).

Authors:  Anita J Norman; Nathaniel R Street; Göran Spong
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-11-18       Impact factor: 3.240

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.