OBJECTIVE: To measure well-being and treatment satisfaction and their correlates in older people with diabetes. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: A postal survey was conducted of 1,000 diabetic patients aged > or = 60 years, representing 56% of the resident older diabetic population in an inner-city health district with a largely indigenous population of 230,000 people and a widely varied socioeconomic mix. Well-being and treatment satisfaction were measured with diabetes-specific instruments and correlated with patient data held in a central register. RESULTS: There was an 81% response. The general well-being scores (median [interquartile range]) for patients on diet alone, tablets, and insulin were 54 (44-60), 53 (42-61), and 48 (35-56) (P < 0.001 comparing insulin with diet and tablets) compared with a scale maximum of 66. Treatment satisfaction scores were 35 (31-36), 35 (32-36), and 34 (30-36) (P < 0.001 comparing insulin with diet and tablets), scale maximum 36. Mean HbA1c concentrations were 5.0 +/- 1.4% (for patients on diet alone), 5.8 +/- 1.6% (tablets), and 6.6 +/- 1.7% (insulin) (P < 0.001 for each difference). Neither well-being nor treatment satisfaction correlated with HbA1c. Insulin-treated patients were younger and had been diabetic longer than non-insulin-treated patients; their well-being remained slightly, but significantly, lower when adjusted for age, sex, BMI, and diabetes duration, but treatment satisfaction was no longer significantly different. Women had lower well-being than men. CONCLUSIONS: It has proved possible to measure well-being and treatment satisfaction in a large community-based samples of older people with diabetes. At the level of glycemic control in this population, neither parameter correlated with HbA1c. The lower well-being in insulin-treated patients remained significant in multivariate analysis.
OBJECTIVE: To measure well-being and treatment satisfaction and their correlates in older people with diabetes. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: A postal survey was conducted of 1,000 diabeticpatients aged > or = 60 years, representing 56% of the resident older diabetic population in an inner-city health district with a largely indigenous population of 230,000 people and a widely varied socioeconomic mix. Well-being and treatment satisfaction were measured with diabetes-specific instruments and correlated with patient data held in a central register. RESULTS: There was an 81% response. The general well-being scores (median [interquartile range]) for patients on diet alone, tablets, and insulin were 54 (44-60), 53 (42-61), and 48 (35-56) (P < 0.001 comparing insulin with diet and tablets) compared with a scale maximum of 66. Treatment satisfaction scores were 35 (31-36), 35 (32-36), and 34 (30-36) (P < 0.001 comparing insulin with diet and tablets), scale maximum 36. Mean HbA1c concentrations were 5.0 +/- 1.4% (for patients on diet alone), 5.8 +/- 1.6% (tablets), and 6.6 +/- 1.7% (insulin) (P < 0.001 for each difference). Neither well-being nor treatment satisfaction correlated with HbA1c. Insulin-treated patients were younger and had been diabetic longer than non-insulin-treated patients; their well-being remained slightly, but significantly, lower when adjusted for age, sex, BMI, and diabetes duration, but treatment satisfaction was no longer significantly different. Women had lower well-being than men. CONCLUSIONS: It has proved possible to measure well-being and treatment satisfaction in a large community-based samples of older people with diabetes. At the level of glycemic control in this population, neither parameter correlated with HbA1c. The lower well-being in insulin-treated patients remained significant in multivariate analysis.
Authors: Sheri L Maddigan; David H Feeny; Sumit R Majumdar; Karen B Farris; Jeffrey A Johnson Journal: Am J Public Health Date: 2006-07-27 Impact factor: 9.308
Authors: R D Reid; H E Tulloch; R J Sigal; G P Kenny; M Fortier; L McDonnell; G A Wells; N G Boulé; P Phillips; D Coyle Journal: Diabetologia Date: 2009-12-13 Impact factor: 10.122
Authors: Patrick O Monahan; Kathleen A Lane; Risa P Hayes; Colleen A McHorney; David G Marrero Journal: Qual Life Res Date: 2009-07-16 Impact factor: 4.147
Authors: Giovanni Aschero; Flavio Fenoglio; Maria Giuseppina Vidili; Andrea Wussler Journal: Health Qual Life Outcomes Date: 2010-09-25 Impact factor: 3.186
Authors: J T George; A P Valdovinos; I Russell; P Dromgoole; S Lomax; D J Torgerson; T Wells; J C Thow Journal: Diabet Med Date: 2008-12 Impact factor: 4.359