Literature DB >> 12569194

Confidentiality and the duties of care.

J O'Brien1, C Chantler.   

Abstract

Doctors have an ethical and legal duty to respect patient confidentiality. We consider the basis for this duty, looking particularly at the meaning and value of autonomy in health care. Enabling patients to decide how information about them is disclosed is an important element in autonomy and helps patients engage as active partners in their care. Good quality data is, however, essential for research, education, public health monitoring, and for many other activities essential to provision of health care. We discuss whether it is necessary to choose between individual rights and the wider public interest and conclude that this should only rarely be necessary. The paper makes some recommendations on practical steps which could help ensure that good quality information is available for work which benefits society and the public health, while still enabling patients' autonomy to be respected.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Professional Patient Relationship

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12569194      PMCID: PMC1733678          DOI: 10.1136/jme.29.1.36

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Med Ethics        ISSN: 0306-6800            Impact factor:   2.903


  5 in total

1.  Consent to cancer registration--an unnecessary burden.

Authors:  I C Paterson
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2001-05-05

2.  Observational study of effect of patient centredness and positive approach on outcomes of general practice consultations.

Authors:  P Little; H Everitt; I Williamson; G Warner; M Moore; C Gould; K Ferrier; S Payne
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2001-10-20

3.  Dealing with research misconduct in the United Kingdom. An American perspective on research integrity.

Authors:  D Rennie
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1998-06-06

4.  Improving doctor-patient communication. Not an option, but a necessity.

Authors:  S Meryn
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1998-06-27

5.  Effect of social class at birth on risk and presentation of schizophrenia: case-control study.

Authors:  F Mulvany; E O'Callaghan; N Takei; M Byrne; P Fearon; C Larkin
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2001-12-15
  5 in total
  8 in total

1.  Legal and ethical considerations in processing patient-identifiable data without patient consent: lessons learnt from developing a disease register.

Authors:  Charlotte L Haynes; Gary A Cook; Michael A Jones
Journal:  J Med Ethics       Date:  2007-05       Impact factor: 2.903

Review 2.  Confidentiality.

Authors:  Julius Bourke; Simon Wessely
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2008-04-19

3.  The risks of absolute medical confidentiality.

Authors:  M A Crook
Journal:  Sci Eng Ethics       Date:  2011-05-25       Impact factor: 3.525

4.  Sharing patient data: competing demands of privacy, trust and research in primary care.

Authors:  Margaret A Stone; Sarah A Redsell; Jennifer T Ling; Alastair D Hay
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 5.386

5.  Concerns over confidentiality may deter adolescents from consulting their doctors. A qualitative exploration.

Authors:  J Carlisle; D Shickle; M Cork; A McDonagh
Journal:  J Med Ethics       Date:  2006-03       Impact factor: 2.903

6.  Confidentiality: concealing "things shameful to be spoken about".

Authors:  Sue E Estroff; Rebecca L Walker
Journal:  Virtual Mentor       Date:  2012-09-01

7.  Public attitudes towards the use of primary care patient record data in medical research without consent: a qualitative study.

Authors:  M R Robling; K Hood; H Houston; R Pill; J Fay; H M Evans
Journal:  J Med Ethics       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 2.903

8.  Procedure versus process: ethical paradigms and the conduct of qualitative research.

Authors:  Kristian Pollock
Journal:  BMC Med Ethics       Date:  2012-09-27       Impact factor: 2.652

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.