Literature DB >> 1836677

Evaluation of a physician education intervention to improve primary care for low-back pain. II. Impact on patients.

D Cherkin1, R A Deyo, A O Berg.   

Abstract

A physician education intervention was previously found to have significantly improved perceived physician knowledge, confidence, and patient-reassuring behavior in the treatment of low-back pain. This study examined whether this intervention, presented in a health maintenance organization clinic, had an effect on patient outcomes. Outcomes of care for 148 patients seen for low-back pain before the intervention were compared with outcomes of care for 157 patients seen after the intervention. Patients were telephoned 2-4 weeks after their back-pain visit and were asked about symptom improvement, amount of disability, and satisfaction with care. Satisfaction was measured with a three-dimensional instrument for low-back pain developed specifically for this study, which was found to be valid and reliable. The preintervention and postintervention patient cohorts were similar in terms of key baseline variables. Despite its apparent benefit to physicians, the intervention did not result in significant improvements in any patient outcomes, even for the subset of patients whose physicians had perceived the greatest benefit.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1991        PMID: 1836677     DOI: 10.1097/00007632-199110000-00008

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)        ISSN: 0362-2436            Impact factor:   3.468


  22 in total

1.  Continuous quality improvement for patients with back pain.

Authors:  R A Deyo; M Schall; D M Berwick; T Nolan; P Carver
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2000-09       Impact factor: 5.128

2.  Developing patient-centred information for back pain sufferers.

Authors:  Claire Glenton
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 3.377

3.  A primary care musculoskeletal clinic for residents: success and sustainability.

Authors:  Thomas K Houston; Robert L Connors; Naomi Cutler; Mary Anne Nidiry
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2004-05       Impact factor: 5.128

4.  Low back pain in the workplace: attainable benefits not attained.

Authors:  W O Spitzer
Journal:  Br J Ind Med       Date:  1993-05

5.  A preliminary path analysis of expectancy and patient-provider encounter in an open-label randomized controlled trial of spinal manipulation for cervicogenic headache.

Authors:  Mitchell Haas; Mikel Aickin; Darcy Vavrek
Journal:  J Manipulative Physiol Ther       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 1.437

6.  Prediction of pain outcomes in a randomized controlled trial of dose-response of spinal manipulation for the care of chronic low back pain.

Authors:  Darcy Vavrek; Mitchell Haas; Moni Blazej Neradilek; Nayak Polissar
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2015-08-19       Impact factor: 2.362

7.  A pilot mixed methods study of patient satisfaction with chiropractic care for back pain.

Authors:  Robert M Rowell; Judith Polipnick
Journal:  J Manipulative Physiol Ther       Date:  2008-10       Impact factor: 1.437

8.  Chronic back pain and work disability: Vocational outcomes following multidisciplinary rehabilitation.

Authors:  M Feuerstein; L Menz; T Zastowny; B A Barron
Journal:  J Occup Rehabil       Date:  1994-12

9.  Quality of integrated chronic care measured by patient survey: identification, selection and application of most appropriate instruments.

Authors:  Hubertus J M Vrijhoef; Rieneke Berbee; Edward H Wagner; Lotte M G Steuten
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2009-08-26       Impact factor: 3.377

10.  Reasons for repeated medical visits among patients with chronic back pain.

Authors:  C A McPhillips-Tangum; D C Cherkin; L A Rhodes; C Markham
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  1998-05       Impact factor: 5.128

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.