Literature DB >> 9610858

A comparative evaluation of mandibular finite element models with different lengths and elements for implant biomechanics.

E R Teixeira1, Y Sato, Y Akagawa, N Shindoi.   

Abstract

Further validity of finite element analysis (FEA) in implant biomechanics requires an increase of modelled range and mesh refinement, and a consequent increase in element number and calculation time. To develop a new method that allows a decrease of the modelled range and element number (along with less calculation time and less computer memory), 10 FEA models of the mandible with different mesio-distal lengths and elements were constructed based on three-dimensional graphic data of the bone structure around an osseointegrated implant. Analysis of stress distribution followed by 100 N loading with the fixation of the most external planes of the models indicated that a minimal bone length of 4.2 mm of the mesial and distal sides was acceptable for FEA representation. Moreover, unification of elements located far away from the implant surface did not affect stress distribution. These results suggest that it may be possible to develop a replica FEA implant model of the mandible with less range and fewer elements without altering stress distribution.

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9610858     DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2842.1998.00244.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Oral Rehabil        ISSN: 0305-182X            Impact factor:   3.837


  13 in total

1.  Study of Biomechanics of Porous Coated Root Form Implant Using Overdenture Attachment: A 3D FEA.

Authors:  Ravindra C Savadi; Chhavi Goyal
Journal:  J Indian Prosthodont Soc       Date:  2011-02-01

2.  Influence of Implant Surface Topography and Loading Condition on Stress Distribution in Bone Around Implants: A Comparative 3D FEA.

Authors:  Ravindra C Savadi; Jatin Agarwal; Rolly Shrivastava Agarwal; V Rangarajan
Journal:  J Indian Prosthodont Soc       Date:  2011-10-19

3.  Angulated abutments and perimplants stress: F.E.M. analysis.

Authors:  P Cardelli; M Montani; M Gallio; M Biancolini; C Brutti; A Barlattani
Journal:  Oral Implantol (Rome)       Date:  2009-12-10

4.  Comparison of Stresses Around Dental Implants Placed in Normal and Fibula Reconstructed Mandibular Models using Finite Element Analysis.

Authors:  Thiyaneswaran Nesappan; Padma Ariga
Journal:  J Clin Diagn Res       Date:  2014-08-20

5.  Stress distribution of various designs of prostheses on short implants or standard implants in posterior maxilla: a three dimensional finite element analysis.

Authors:  K Jomjunyong; P Rungsiyakull; C Rungsiyakull; W Aunmeungtong; M Chantaramungkorn; P Khongkhunthian
Journal:  Oral Implantol (Rome)       Date:  2017-01-21

6.  Force transfer and stress distribution in an implant-supported overdenture retained with a hader bar attachment: a finite element analysis.

Authors:  Preeti Satheesh Kumar; Kumar K S Satheesh; Jins John; Geetha Patil; Ruchi Patel
Journal:  ISRN Dent       Date:  2013-12-26

7.  Stress distribution patterns of implant supported overdentures-analog versus finite element analysis: A comparative in-vitro study.

Authors:  Soumyadev Satpathy; C L Satish Babu; Shilpa Shetty; Bharat Raj
Journal:  J Indian Prosthodont Soc       Date:  2015 Jul-Sep

8.  Influence of three different implant thread designs on stress distribution: A three-dimensional finite element analysis.

Authors:  Mansi Manish Oswal; Ulhas N Amasi; Manish S Oswal; Ashish S Bhagat
Journal:  J Indian Prosthodont Soc       Date:  2016 Oct-Dec

9.  A three-dimensional finite element study on the stress distribution pattern of two prosthetic abutments for external hexagon implants.

Authors:  Wagner Moreira; Caio Hermann; Jucélio Tomás Pereira; Jean Anacleto Balbinoti; Rodrigo Tiossi
Journal:  Eur J Dent       Date:  2013-10

10.  Three-dimensional finite element analysis of the splinted implant prosthesis in a reconstructed mandible.

Authors:  Kyung-Hoi Heo; Young-Jun Lim; Myung-Joo Kim; Ho-Beom Kwon
Journal:  J Adv Prosthodont       Date:  2018-04-18       Impact factor: 1.904

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.