Literature DB >> 9610215

Using the EuroQoI 5-D in the Catalan general population: feasibility and construct validity.

X Badia1, A Schiaffino, J Alonso, M Herdman.   

Abstract

Spanish and Catalan versions of the EuroQoi 5-D (EQ-5D) were included in the Catalan Health Interview Survey (CHIS) and administered to a randomly selected cross-section of 12,245 individuals from the Catalan general population. This paper analyses the feasibility, convergent validity and construct validity of three parts of the EQ-5D (the descriptive system, the visual analogue scale (VAS) and the Spanish tariff) using the results obtained in the CHIS. The feasibility was assessed by the number of missing responses. The convergent validity was based on the correlations between the EQ-5D scores and the scores on the General Health Questionnaire (GHQ) and on an index of self-perceived overall health. The construct validity was assessed by analysing the degree to which lower scores on the EQ-5D correlated positively with increasing age, being female, being in a lower social class or having a lower level of education and with increasing levels of disability, co-morbidity, restricted activity, mental health problems and poor self-perceived health. A low number of missing responses on the descriptive system and the VAS (1.5%) indicated a high level of acceptance. A marked ceiling effect was found, with 67% of the sample reporting no problem in any EQ dimension. The convergent validity with the GHQ was generally low, though moderate on the mood dimension. Self-perceived overall health correlated moderately to strongly with the mean VAS and tariff values. The positive correlations between lower scores on all three elements of the EQ-5D and increasing age, increasing levels of disability, comorbidity, restricted activity, mental health problems and poor self-perceived health provide some evidence of the instrument's construct validity, as does the fact that women reported more problems than men. Multivariate analyses using the VAS and tariff values as dependent variables and all of the sociodemographic and health variables as independent variables reached R2 values of 0.45 and 0.81, respectively. The Spanish and Catalan versions of the EQ-5D have proved to be feasible and valid for use in health interview surveys.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9610215     DOI: 10.1023/a:1024933913698

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Qual Life Res        ISSN: 0962-9343            Impact factor:   4.147


  13 in total

1.  EuroQol--a new facility for the measurement of health-related quality of life.

Authors: 
Journal:  Health Policy       Date:  1990-12       Impact factor: 2.980

Review 2.  Multi-attribute health status classification systems. Health Utilities Index.

Authors:  D Feeny; W Furlong; M Boyle; G W Torrance
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  1995-06       Impact factor: 4.981

Review 3.  EuroQol: the current state of play.

Authors:  R Brooks
Journal:  Health Policy       Date:  1996-07       Impact factor: 2.980

4.  The sickness impact profile: validation of a health status measure.

Authors:  M Bergner; R A Bobbitt; W E Pollard; D P Martin; B S Gilson
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  1976-01       Impact factor: 2.983

Review 5.  Application of health status assessment measures in policy research.

Authors:  D M Steinwachs
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  1989-03       Impact factor: 2.983

6.  [Proposal of an indicator of "social class" based on the occupation].

Authors:  A Domingo Salvany; J Marcos Alonso
Journal:  Gac Sanit       Date:  1989 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 2.139

7.  Testing the validity of the Euroqol and comparing it with the SF-36 health survey questionnaire.

Authors:  J Brazier; N Jones; P Kind
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  1993-06       Impact factor: 4.147

8.  Measuring health and health state preferences among critically ill patients.

Authors:  X Badia; A Díaz-Prieto; M Rué; D L Patrick
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  1996-12       Impact factor: 17.440

9.  Toward clinical applications of health status measures: sensitivity of scales to clinically important changes.

Authors:  R A Deyo; T S Inui
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  1984-08       Impact factor: 3.402

10.  The time trade-off method: results from a general population study.

Authors:  P Dolan; C Gudex; P Kind; A Williams
Journal:  Health Econ       Date:  1996 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 3.046

View more
  85 in total

1.  Feasibility, validity and test-retest reliability of scaling methods for health states: the visual analogue scale and the time trade-off.

Authors:  X Badia; S Monserrat; M Roset; M Herdman
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  1999-06       Impact factor: 4.147

2.  Sample size calculations in studies using the EuroQol 5D.

Authors:  M Roset; X Badia; N E Mayo
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  1999-09       Impact factor: 4.147

3.  Swedish population health-related quality of life results using the EQ-5D.

Authors:  K Burström; M Johannesson; F Diderichsen
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 4.147

4.  Validity and reliability of the EQ-5D self-report questionnaire in English-speaking Asian patients with rheumatic diseases in Singapore.

Authors:  N Luo; L H Chew; K Y Fong; D R Koh; S C Ng; K H Yoon; S Vasoo; S C Li; J Thumboo
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2003-02       Impact factor: 4.147

5.  New model to explain the EQ-5D VAS in patients who have undergone spinal fusion.

Authors:  Jorge Cortés; Juan F Blanco; David Pescador; Nuria Asensio; Claudio Castro; Juan Moncada Herrera
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2010-08-09       Impact factor: 4.147

6.  Discriminative capacity of the EQ-5D, SF-6D, and SF-12 as measures of health status in population health survey.

Authors:  Oriol Cunillera; Ricard Tresserras; Luis Rajmil; Gemma Vilagut; Pilar Brugulat; Mike Herdman; Anna Mompart; Antonia Medina; Yolanda Pardo; Jordi Alonso; John Brazier; Montse Ferrer
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2010-03-31       Impact factor: 4.147

7.  Do Portuguese and UK health state values differ across valuation methods?

Authors:  Lara N Ferreira; Pedro L Ferreira; Donna Rowen; John E Brazier
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2011-05       Impact factor: 4.147

8.  First-Year Economic and Quality of Life Effects of the RAINBOW Intervention to Treat Comorbid Obesity and Depression.

Authors:  Jeremy D Goldhaber-Fiebert; Lea Prince; Lan Xiao; Nan Lv; Lisa G Rosas; Elizabeth M Venditti; Megan A Lewis; Mark B Snowden; Jun Ma
Journal:  Obesity (Silver Spring)       Date:  2020-04-22       Impact factor: 5.002

9.  Psychometric properties of the EQ-5D-5L in the general population of South Korea.

Authors:  Tae Hyup Kim; Min-Woo Jo; Sang-il Lee; Seon Ha Kim; Son Mi Chung
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2012-12-06       Impact factor: 4.147

10.  Quality-of-life loss of people admitted to burn centers, United States.

Authors:  Ted Miller; Soma Bhattacharya; William Zamula; Dennis Lezotte; Karen Kowalske; David Herndon; James Fauerbach; Loren Engrav
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2012-12-08       Impact factor: 4.147

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.