Literature DB >> 9610116

The gender difference on the Mental Rotations test is not due to performance factors.

M S Masters1.   

Abstract

Men score higher than women on the Mental Rotations test (MRT), and the magnitude of this gender difference is the largest of that on any spatial test. Goldstein, Haldane, and Mitchell (1990) reported finding that the gender difference on the MRT disappears when "performance factors" are controlled--specifically, when subjects are allowed sufficient time to attempt all items on the test or when a scoring procedure that controls for the number of items attempted is used. The present experiment also explored whether eliminating these performance factors results in a disappearance of the gender difference on the test. Male and female college students were allowed a short time period or unlimited time on the MRT. The tests were scored according to three different procedures. The results showed no evidence that the gender difference on the MRT was affected by the scoring method or the time limit. Regardless of the scoring procedure, men scored higher than women, and the magnitude of the gender difference persisted undiminished when subjects completed all items on the test. Thus there was no evidence that performance factors produced the gender difference on the MRT. These results are consistent with the results of other investigators who have attempted to replicate Goldstein et al.'s findings.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9610116     DOI: 10.3758/bf03201154

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mem Cognit        ISSN: 0090-502X


  19 in total

1.  Sex differences in visual-spatial ability: the role of performance factors.

Authors:  D Goldstein; D Haldane; C Mitchell
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  1990-09

2.  Gender differences in three-dimensional mental rotation: a replication.

Authors:  D C Geary; J W Gilger; B Elliott-Miller
Journal:  J Genet Psychol       Date:  1992-03       Impact factor: 1.509

3.  Sex differences in visuospatial ability: do performance factors play such an important role?

Authors:  A R Delgado; G Prieto
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  1996-07

4.  Personality, intelligence, and spatial visualization: correlates of mental rotations test performance.

Authors:  D J Ozer
Journal:  J Pers Soc Psychol       Date:  1987-07

5.  Mental rotation of three-dimensional objects.

Authors:  R N Shepard; J Metzler
Journal:  Science       Date:  1971-02-19       Impact factor: 47.728

6.  Performance factors and gender-related differences in spatial ability: another assessment.

Authors:  H Stumpf
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  1993-11

7.  Searching for correlates of spatial ability.

Authors:  S G Vandenberg; A R Kuse; G P Vogler
Journal:  Percept Mot Skills       Date:  1985-04

8.  The sex difference on one test of spatial visualization: a nontrivial difference.

Authors:  B Sanders; M P Soares; J M D'Aquila
Journal:  Child Dev       Date:  1982-08

9.  Exceptions to the male advantage on a spatial task: family handedness and college major as factors identifying women who excel.

Authors:  M B Casey; M M Brabeck
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  1989       Impact factor: 3.139

10.  Sex differences in mental rotations: an effect of time limits?

Authors:  S M Resnick
Journal:  Brain Cogn       Date:  1993-01       Impact factor: 2.310

View more
  11 in total

1.  Sex differences in visuospatial working memory: components of cognitive processing.

Authors:  S Loring-Meier; D F Halpern
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  1999-09

2.  Gender differences in object location memory: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Daniel Voyer; Albert Postma; Brandy Brake; Julianne Imperato-McGinley
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2007-02

3.  Time limits and gender differences on paper-and-pencil tests of mental rotation: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Daniel Voyer
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2011-04

4.  Stereotype susceptibility narrows the gender gap in imagined self-rotation performance.

Authors:  Maryjane Wraga; Lauren Duncan; Emily C Jacobs; Molly Helt; Jessica Church
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2006-10

5.  Timing conditions and the magnitude of gender differences on the Mental Rotations Test.

Authors:  Daniel Voyer; Marguerite A Rodgers; Peter A McCormick
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2004-01

6.  Gender differences in unilateral spatial neglect within 24 hours of ischemic stroke.

Authors:  Jonathan T Kleinman; Rebecca F Gottesman; Cameron Davis; Melissa Newhart; Jennifer Heidler-Gary; Argye E Hillis
Journal:  Brain Cogn       Date:  2008-04-11       Impact factor: 2.310

7.  Does men's advantage in mental rotation persist when real three-dimensional objects are either felt or seen?

Authors:  Michèle Robert; Eliane Chevrier
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2003-10

8.  Gender effects in spatial orientation: cognitive profiles and mental strategies.

Authors:  Andrea Bosco; Anna M Longoni; Tomaso Vecchi
Journal:  Appl Cogn Psychol       Date:  2004-07

9.  Sensitivity to numerosity is not a unique visuospatial psychophysical predictor of mathematical ability.

Authors:  Marc S Tibber; Gemma S L Manasseh; Richard C Clarke; Galina Gagin; Sonja N Swanbeck; Brian Butterworth; R Beau Lotto; Steven C Dakin
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2013-06-29       Impact factor: 1.886

10.  Experimental But Not Sex Differences of a Mental Rotation Training Program on Adolescents.

Authors:  Antonio Rodán; María José Contreras; M Rosa Elosúa; Patricia Gimeno
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2016-07-12
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.