Literature DB >> 17328378

Stereotype susceptibility narrows the gender gap in imagined self-rotation performance.

Maryjane Wraga1, Lauren Duncan, Emily C Jacobs, Molly Helt, Jessica Church.   

Abstract

Three studies examined the impact of stereotype messages on men's and women's performance of a mental rotation task involving imagined self-rotations. Experiment 1 established baseline differences between men and women; women made 12% more errors than did men. Experiment 2 found that exposure to a positive stereotype message enhanced women's performance in comparison with that of another group of women who received neutral information. In Experiment 3, men who were exposed to the same stereotype message emphasizing a female advantage made more errors than did male controls, and the magnitude of error was similar to that for women from Experiment 1. The results suggest that the gender gap in mental rotation performance is partially caused by experiential factors, particularly those induced by sociocultural stereotypes.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 17328378     DOI: 10.3758/bf03194002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev        ISSN: 1069-9384


  20 in total

1.  Who says a woman can't be Einstein?

Authors:  Amanda Ripley
Journal:  Time       Date:  2005-03-07

2.  A threat in the air. How stereotypes shape intellectual identity and performance.

Authors:  C M Steele
Journal:  Am Psychol       Date:  1997-06

3.  Updating displays after imagined object and viewer rotations.

Authors:  M Wraga; S H Creem; D R Proffitt
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2000-01       Impact factor: 3.051

4.  The assessment and analysis of handedness: the Edinburgh inventory.

Authors:  R C Oldfield
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  1971-03       Impact factor: 3.139

5.  Mental rotation of three-dimensional objects.

Authors:  R N Shepard; J Metzler
Journal:  Science       Date:  1971-02-19       Impact factor: 47.728

6.  Stereotype threat and the intellectual test performance of African Americans.

Authors:  C M Steele; J Aronson
Journal:  J Pers Soc Psychol       Date:  1995-11

7.  Object-array structure, frames of reference, and retrieval of spatial knowledge.

Authors:  R D Easton; M J Sholl
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  1995-03       Impact factor: 3.051

8.  Magnitude of sex differences in spatial abilities: a meta-analysis and consideration of critical variables.

Authors:  D Voyer; S Voyer; M P Bryden
Journal:  Psychol Bull       Date:  1995-03       Impact factor: 17.737

9.  Imagined rotations of self versus objects: an fMRI study.

Authors:  Maryjane Wraga; Jennifer M Shephard; Jessica A Church; Souheil Inati; Stephen M Kosslyn
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2005-01-20       Impact factor: 3.139

10.  Thinking outside the body: an advantage for spatial updating during imagined versus physical self-rotation.

Authors:  Maryjane Wraga
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2003-09       Impact factor: 3.051

View more
  12 in total

Review 1.  An integrated process model of stereotype threat effects on performance.

Authors:  Toni Schmader; Michael Johns; Chad Forbes
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  2008-04       Impact factor: 8.934

2.  Stereotype threat, trait perseveration, and vagal activity: evidence for mechanisms underpinning health disparities in Black Americans.

Authors:  DeWayne P Williams; Nicholas Joseph; LaBarron K Hill; John J Sollers; Michael W Vasey; Baldwin M Way; Julian Koenig; Julian F Thayer
Journal:  Ethn Health       Date:  2017-09-19       Impact factor: 2.772

3.  Neural basis of stereotype-induced shifts in women's mental rotation performance.

Authors:  Maryjane Wraga; Molly Helt; Emily Jacobs; Kerry Sullivan
Journal:  Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci       Date:  2007-03       Impact factor: 3.436

4.  Dimensional transformation in tests of spatial and environmental cognition.

Authors:  Kashka Iwanowska; Daniel Voyer
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2013-11

5.  Exploring the movement dynamics of deception.

Authors:  Nicholas D Duran; Rick Dale; Christopher T Kello; Chris N H Street; Daniel C Richardson
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2013-03-27

6.  Cultural background shapes spatial reference frame proclivity.

Authors:  Caspar Goeke; Suchada Kornpetpanee; Moritz Köster; Andrés B Fernández-Revelles; Klaus Gramann; Peter König
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2015-06-15       Impact factor: 4.379

7.  Gender stereotype susceptibility.

Authors:  Marina A Pavlova; Susanna Weber; Elisabeth Simoes; Alexander N Sokolov
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-12-17       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Gender-stereotyping and cognitive sex differences in mixed- and same-sex groups.

Authors:  Marco Hirnstein; Lisa Coloma Andrews; Markus Hausmann
Journal:  Arch Sex Behav       Date:  2014-06-13

Review 9.  Twenty Years of Stereotype Threat Research: A Review of Psychological Mediators.

Authors:  Charlotte R Pennington; Derek Heim; Andrew R Levy; Derek T Larkin
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-01-11       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Cognition and the Placebo Effect--Dissociating Subjective Perception and Actual Performance.

Authors:  Katharina A Schwarz; Christian Büchel
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-07-06       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.