Literature DB >> 8757498

Sex differences in visuospatial ability: do performance factors play such an important role?

A R Delgado1, G Prieto.   

Abstract

This study was designed to analyze some performance factors as a possible source of sex-related bias in psychometric tests of visuospatial aptitude. Goldstein, Haldane, and Mitchell (1990) explored the effect of two response styles-slowness of performance and reluctance to guess-by using a 3-D mental rotation test (the task showing the largest cognitive sex difference) and found that time limits and raw scores contributed substantially to the male advantage. We applied two tests in the speed-power continuum to a representative sample of 621 males and 821 females in their last year of high school in a 2 x 2 (gender x time) full factorial design. Reluctance to guess was similar for males and females. Males obtained more correct responses on both tests, and for both time conditions, than did females. These results are not only statistically significant but also are of substantial practical consequence.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8757498     DOI: 10.3758/bf03200938

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mem Cognit        ISSN: 0090-502X


  8 in total

1.  Sex differences in visual-spatial ability: the role of performance factors.

Authors:  D Goldstein; D Haldane; C Mitchell
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  1990-09

2.  Mathematics education: a predictor of scientific competitiveness.

Authors:  L A Steen
Journal:  Science       Date:  1987-07-17       Impact factor: 47.728

3.  Reaction time assessments of gender differences in visual-spatial performance.

Authors:  P M Blough; L K Slavin
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1987-03

Review 4.  Do sex-related differences in spatial abilities exist? A multilevel critique with new data.

Authors:  P J Caplan; G M MacPherson; P Tobin
Journal:  Am Psychol       Date:  1985-07

5.  Is the gender difference in mental rotation disappearing?

Authors:  M S Masters; B Sanders
Journal:  Behav Genet       Date:  1993-07       Impact factor: 2.805

6.  The sex difference on one test of spatial visualization: a nontrivial difference.

Authors:  B Sanders; M P Soares; J M D'Aquila
Journal:  Child Dev       Date:  1982-08

7.  Sex-related differences in response to practice on a visual-spatial test and generalization to a related test.

Authors:  J M Connor; M Schackman; L A Serbin
Journal:  Child Dev       Date:  1978-03

8.  Sex differences in mental rotations: an effect of time limits?

Authors:  S M Resnick
Journal:  Brain Cogn       Date:  1993-01       Impact factor: 2.310

  8 in total
  16 in total

1.  Sex differences in dynamic spatial ability: the unsolved question of performance factors.

Authors:  María José Contreras; Victor J Rubio; Daniel Peña; Roberto Colom; José Santacreu
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2007-03

2.  White matter development in adolescence: a DTI study.

Authors:  M R Asato; R Terwilliger; J Woo; B Luna
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2010-01-05       Impact factor: 5.357

3.  Time limits and gender differences on paper-and-pencil tests of mental rotation: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Daniel Voyer
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2011-04

4.  Sex differences in brain gray and white matter in healthy young adults: correlations with cognitive performance.

Authors:  R C Gur; B I Turetsky; M Matsui; M Yan; W Bilker; P Hughett; R E Gur
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  1999-05-15       Impact factor: 6.167

5.  Allocentric visuospatial processing in patients with cerebral gliomas: a neurocognitive assessment.

Authors:  V Jagaroo; M P Rogers; P M Black
Journal:  J Neurooncol       Date:  2000-09       Impact factor: 4.130

6.  Sex dimorphisms in the rate of age-related decline in spatial memory: relevance to alterations in the estrous cycle.

Authors:  A L Markowska
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  1999-09-15       Impact factor: 6.167

7.  Sex differences in parietal lobe morphology: relationship to mental rotation performance.

Authors:  Tim Koscik; Dan O'Leary; David J Moser; Nancy C Andreasen; Peg Nopoulos
Journal:  Brain Cogn       Date:  2008-11-05       Impact factor: 2.310

8.  The gender difference on the Mental Rotations test is not due to performance factors.

Authors:  M S Masters
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  1998-05

Review 9.  Evidence for gender differences in cognition, emotion and quality of life in Parkinson's disease?

Authors:  Julia Heller; Imis Dogan; Jörg B Schulz; Kathrin Reetz
Journal:  Aging Dis       Date:  2013-10-22       Impact factor: 6.745

10.  Chubby hands or little fingers: sex differences in hand representation.

Authors:  Lara A Coelho; Claudia L R Gonzalez
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2018-04-03
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.