Literature DB >> 9605656

Guidelines for sentinel node biopsy and lymphatic mapping of patients with breast cancer.

C E Cox1, S Pendas, J M Cox, E Joseph, A R Shons, T Yeatman, N N Ku, G H Lyman, C Berman, F Haddad, D S Reintgen.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To define preliminary guidelines for the use of lymphatic mapping techniques in patients with breast cancer. SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA: Lymphatic mapping techniques have the potential of changing the standard of surgical care of patients with breast cancer.
METHODS: Four hundred sixty-six consecutive patients with newly diagnosed breast cancer underwent a prospective trial of intraoperative lymphatic mapping using a combination of vital blue dye and filtered technetium-labeled sulfur colloid. A sentinel lymph node (SLN) was defined as a blue node and/or a hot node with a 10:1 ex vivo gamma probe ratio of SLN to non-SLN. All SLNs were bivalved, step-sectioned, and examined with routine hematoxylin and eosin (H&E) stains and immunohistochemical stains for cytokeratin. A cytokeratin-positive SLN was defined as any SLN with a defined cluster of positive-staining cells that could be confirmed histologically on H&E sections.
RESULTS: Fine-needle aspiration (FNA) or stereotactic core biopsy was used to diagnose 195 of the 422 patients (46.2%) with breast cancer; 227 of 422 patients (53.8%) were diagnosed by excisional biopsy. The SLN was successfully identified in 440 of 466 patients (94.4%). Failure to identify an SLN to the axilla intraoperatively occurred in 26 of 466 patients (5.6%). In all patients who failed lymphatic mappings, a complete axillary dissection was performed, and metastatic disease was documented in 4 of 26 (15.4%) of these patients. Of the 26 patients who failed lymphatic mapping, 11 of 227 (4.8%) were diagnosed by excisional biopsy and 15 of 195 (7.7%) were diagnosed by FNA or stereotactic core biopsy. Of interest, there was only one skip metastasis (defined as a negative SLN with higher nodes in the chain being positive) in a patient with prior excisional biopsy. A mean of 1.92 SLNs were harvested per patient. Twenty percent of the SLNs removed were positive for metastatic disease in 105 of 440 (23.8%) of the patients. Descriptive information on 844 SLNs was evaluated: 339 of 844 (40.2%) were hot, 272 of 844 (32.2%) were blue, and 233 of 844 (27.6%) were both hot and blue. At least one positive SLN was found in 4 of 87 patients (4.6%) with noninvasive (ductal carcinoma in situ) tumors. A greater incidence of positive SLNs was found in patients who had invasive tumors of increasing size: 18 of 112 patients (16%) with tumor size between 0.1 mm and 1 cm had positive SLNs. However, a significantly greater percentage of patients (43 of 131 [32.8%] with tumor size between 1 and 2 cm and 31 of 76 [40.8%] with tumor size between 2 and 5 cm) had positive SLNs. The highest incidence of positive SLNs was seen with patients of tumor size greater than 5 cm; in this group, 9 of 12 (75%) had a positive SLN (p < 0.001).
CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrates that accurate SLN identification was obtained when all blue and hot lymph nodes were harvested as SLNs. Therefore, lymphatic mapping and SLN biopsy is most effective when a combination of vital blue dye and radiolabeled sulfur colloid is used. Furthermore, these data demonstrate that patients with ductal carcinoma in situ or small tumors exhibit a low but significant incidence of metastatic disease to the axillary lymph nodes and may benefit most from selective lymphadenectomy, avoiding the unnecessary complications of a complete axillary lymph node dissection.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9605656      PMCID: PMC1191339          DOI: 10.1097/00000658-199805000-00005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Surg        ISSN: 0003-4932            Impact factor:   12.969


  18 in total

1.  Touch preparation cytology of breast lumpectomy margins with histologic correlation.

Authors:  C E Cox; N N Ku; D S Reintgen; H M Greenberg; S V Nicosia; S Wangensteen
Journal:  Arch Surg       Date:  1991-04

Review 2.  Is axillary lymph node dissection necessary in routine management of breast cancer? No.

Authors:  B Cady
Journal:  Important Adv Oncol       Date:  1996

3.  Imprint cytology of needle-localized breast lesions.

Authors:  A S Shabaik; C E Cox; R A Clark; D S Reintgen; E J Humphrey; S V Nicosia
Journal:  Acta Cytol       Date:  1993 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 2.319

Review 4.  Rationale for routine axillary dissection in carcinoma of the breast.

Authors:  W K Ruffin; A Stacey-Clear; J Younger; H C Hoover
Journal:  J Am Coll Surg       Date:  1995-02       Impact factor: 6.113

5.  Reappraisal of the role of axillary lymph node dissection in the conservative treatment of breast cancer.

Authors:  B G Haffty; B Ward; P Pathare; R Salem; C McKhann; M Beinfield; D Fischer; M Reiss
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  1997-02       Impact factor: 44.544

6.  Lymphatic mapping and sentinel node biopsy in the patient with breast cancer.

Authors:  J J Albertini; G H Lyman; C Cox; T Yeatman; L Balducci; N Ku; S Shivers; C Berman; K Wells; D Rapaport; A Shons; J Horton; H Greenberg; S Nicosia; R Clark; A Cantor; D S Reintgen
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1996-12-11       Impact factor: 56.272

7.  Detection of breast cancer micrometastases in axillary lymph nodes by using polymerase chain reaction.

Authors:  A Schoenfeld; Y Luqmani; D Smith; S O'Reilly; S Shousha; H D Sinnett; R C Coombes
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  1994-06-01       Impact factor: 12.701

8.  Lymphatic mapping and sentinel lymphadenectomy for breast cancer.

Authors:  A E Giuliano; D M Kirgan; J M Guenther; D L Morton
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1994-09       Impact factor: 12.969

9.  Detection of breast cancer micrometastases in axillary lymph nodes by means of reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction. Comparison between MUC1 mRNA and keratin 19 mRNA amplification.

Authors:  S Noguchi; T Aihara; K Motomura; H Inaji; S Imaoka; H Koyama
Journal:  Am J Pathol       Date:  1996-02       Impact factor: 4.307

Review 10.  Improved axillary staging of breast cancer with sentinel lymphadenectomy.

Authors:  A E Giuliano; P S Dale; R R Turner; D L Morton; S W Evans; D L Krasne
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1995-09       Impact factor: 12.969

View more
  80 in total

1.  Re: Chu et al "Do all patients with sentinel node metastasis from breast carcinoma need complete axillary node dissection?".

Authors:  F D Rahusen; S Meijer; P J van Diest
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2000-04       Impact factor: 12.969

2.  Lessons learned from 500 cases of lymphatic mapping for breast cancer.

Authors:  A D Hill; K N Tran; T Akhurst; H Yeung; S D Yeh; P P Rosen; P I Borgen; H S Cody
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1999-04       Impact factor: 12.969

Review 3.  Axillary staging of breast cancer and the sentinel node.

Authors:  G Cserni
Journal:  J Clin Pathol       Date:  2000-10       Impact factor: 3.411

4.  Effect of the use of vital dye, lymphoscintigraphy, or a combination for axillary lymphatic mapping and sentinel node biopsy in breast cancer.

Authors:  Giovanni d'Eredita; Gabriella Serio; Marino Mele; Carmela Giardina; Martino Martellotta; Filippo Ferrarese
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2002-02-20       Impact factor: 3.352

5.  Practice patterns of lymph-node mapping and sentinel-node biopsy for breast cancer in British Columbia.

Authors:  Boon Chua; Ivo A Olivotto; James C Donald; Allen H Hayashi; Noelle Davis; Conrad H Rusnak
Journal:  Can J Surg       Date:  2003-08       Impact factor: 2.089

6.  Intraoperative subareolar radioisotope injection for immediate sentinel lymph node biopsy.

Authors:  Rakhshanda Layeeque; Julie Kepple; Ronda S Henry-Tillman; Laura Adkins; Rena Kass; Maureen Colvert; Regina Gibson; Anne Mancino; Soheila Korourian; V Suzanne Klimberg
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 12.969

7.  [Sentinel lymph node biopsy in breast cancer].

Authors:  A Rody; C Solbach; M Kaufmann
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 0.955

8.  Sentinel node biopsy in breast cancer. Effect on patients must be considered.

Authors:  H Thornton
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1999-02-27

9.  Intraoperative imprint cytologic evaluation of sentinel lymph nodes for lobular carcinoma of the breast.

Authors:  Andrew J Creager; Kim R Geisinger; Nancy D Perrier; Perry Shen; Jo Ann Shaw; Peter R Young; Doug Case; Edward A Levine
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 12.969

Review 10.  Use of tomographic nuclear medicine procedures, SPECT and pinhole SPECT, with cationic lipophilic radiotracers for the evaluation of axillary lymph node status in breast cancer patients.

Authors:  Giuseppe Madeddu; Angela Spanu
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2004-04-15       Impact factor: 9.236

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.