Literature DB >> 12098050

Effect of the use of vital dye, lymphoscintigraphy, or a combination for axillary lymphatic mapping and sentinel node biopsy in breast cancer.

Giovanni d'Eredita1, Gabriella Serio, Marino Mele, Carmela Giardina, Martino Martellotta, Filippo Ferrarese.   

Abstract

Axillary dissection in patients with breast cancer is associated with significant morbidity. Because 85% of the patients with a cancer < or = 1 cm have negative axillary nodal status, axillary dissection in these patients is only a staging procedure. A study of the sentinel lymph node (SLN) biopsy has been developed to determine axillary nodal status by means of a minimally invasive procedure. The aim of our study was to estimate the degree of reliability for identifying the SLN using a vital dye or lymphoscintigraphy, or a combination of the two. From January 1999 to May 2000 a series of 60 patients with breast cancer were evaluated for enrollment in the study. For the mapping procedure, lymphoscintigraphy in combination with injection of vital blue dye was performed in 24 patients, and vital dye alone was utilized in 36. Complete axillary dissection was performed in all patients after SLN biopsy. The mapping procedure was possible in 59 cases (98.3%). The SLNs were positive in 19 patients (32.2%) and negative in 40; in 38 of the 40 patients all axillary nodes were negative. There was concordance in 57 of 59 cases (96.6%). The false-negative rate was 5% (2/40). The overall sensitivity of the SLN biopsy was 90.4% (19/21), with a negative predictive value of 95% (38/40). Our results indicate that SLN biopsy guided by a gamma probe in combination with vital dye can identify a negative axilla with high accuracy. We conclude that the use of both techniques produces an optimal result, as they are complementary.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12098050     DOI: 10.1007/s00268-001-0272-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  World J Surg        ISSN: 0364-2313            Impact factor:   3.352


  10 in total

Review 1.  Consequences of sentinel node in clinical decision making in breast cancer and prospects for future studies.

Authors:  U Veronesi; S Zurrida; V Galimberti
Journal:  Eur J Surg Oncol       Date:  1998-04       Impact factor: 4.424

2.  Guidelines for sentinel node biopsy and lymphatic mapping of patients with breast cancer.

Authors:  C E Cox; S Pendas; J M Cox; E Joseph; A R Shons; T Yeatman; N N Ku; G H Lyman; C Berman; F Haddad; D S Reintgen
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1998-05       Impact factor: 12.969

Review 3.  State-of-the-art approaches to sentinel node biopsy for breast cancer: study design, patient selection, technique, and quality control at Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center.

Authors:  H S Cody; P I Borgen
Journal:  Surg Oncol       Date:  1999-08       Impact factor: 3.279

4.  Use of avidin-biotin-peroxidase complex (ABC) in immunoperoxidase techniques: a comparison between ABC and unlabeled antibody (PAP) procedures.

Authors:  S M Hsu; L Raine; H Fanger
Journal:  J Histochem Cytochem       Date:  1981-04       Impact factor: 2.479

5.  Sentinel lymph node biopsy in breast cancer: initial experience at Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center.

Authors:  B J O'Hea; A D Hill; A M El-Shirbiny; S D Yeh; P P Rosen; D G Coit; P I Borgen; H S Cody
Journal:  J Am Coll Surg       Date:  1998-04       Impact factor: 6.113

6.  Lymphatic mapping and sentinel node biopsy in the patient with breast cancer.

Authors:  J J Albertini; G H Lyman; C Cox; T Yeatman; L Balducci; N Ku; S Shivers; C Berman; K Wells; D Rapaport; A Shons; J Horton; H Greenberg; S Nicosia; R Clark; A Cantor; D S Reintgen
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1996-12-11       Impact factor: 56.272

7.  Limitation in gamma probe localization of the sentinel node in breast cancer patients with large excisional biopsy.

Authors:  S M Feldman; D N Krag; R K McNally; B B Moor; D L Weaver; P Klein
Journal:  J Am Coll Surg       Date:  1999-03       Impact factor: 6.113

8.  Lymphatic mapping and sentinel lymphadenectomy for breast cancer.

Authors:  A E Giuliano; D M Kirgan; J M Guenther; D L Morton
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1994-09       Impact factor: 12.969

9.  Distribution of axillary node metastases by level of invasion. An analysis of 539 cases.

Authors:  U Veronesi; F Rilke; A Luini; V Sacchini; V Galimberti; T Campa; E Dei Bei; M Greco; A Magni; M Merson
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  1987-02-15       Impact factor: 6.860

10.  Gamma probe-guided sentinel node biopsy to select patients with melanoma for lymphadenectomy.

Authors:  H van der Veen; O S Hoekstra; M A Paul; M A Cuesta; S Meijer
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  1994-12       Impact factor: 6.939

  10 in total
  3 in total

1.  The hidden sentinel node and SPECT/CT in breast cancer patients.

Authors:  Iris M C van der Ploeg; Renato A Valdés Olmos; Bin B R Kroon; Emiel J T Rutgers; Omgo E Nieweg
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2008-08-20       Impact factor: 9.236

2.  The impact of previous para-areolar incision in the upper outer quadrant of the breast on the localization of the sentinel lymph node in a canine model.

Authors:  Paulo Henrique Diógenes Vasques; Luiz Gonzaga Porto Pinheiro; João Marcos de Meneses E Silva; José Ricardo de Moura Torres-de-Melo; Karine Bessa Porto Pinheiro; João Ivo Xavier Rocha
Journal:  Clinics (Sao Paulo)       Date:  2011       Impact factor: 2.365

3.  Nonvisualization of sentinel node by lymphoscintigraphy in advanced breast cancer.

Authors:  Brian Wosnitzer; Rosna Mirtcheva; Munir Ghesani
Journal:  Radiol Case Rep       Date:  2015-11-06
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.