Literature DB >> 7677468

Improved axillary staging of breast cancer with sentinel lymphadenectomy.

A E Giuliano1, P S Dale, R R Turner, D L Morton, S W Evans, D L Krasne.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The authors evaluated the effect of intraoperative lymphatic mapping and sentinel lymphadenectomy (SLND) on the axillary staging of patients with carcinoma of the breast. SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA: The accurate staging of patients with breast cancer is essential to guide management and determine prognosis. The authors previously reported the feasibility and accuracy of SLND in breast carcinoma. Sentinel lymphadenectomy identifies the first ("sentinel") axillary lymph node draining the site of a primary tumor; because this node is the most likely site of axillary metastasis, histopathologic examination of the sentinel node correlates well with examination of the entire axillary contents. The current study compares SLND with standard axillary lymphadenectomy (ALND) for the staging of breast carcinoma.
METHODS: The incidence of axillary node metastasis and micrometastasis in SLND and ALND specimens from patients undergoing operative treatment of a primary breast carcinoma was compared prospectively. Multiple sections of each sentinel lymph node in SLND specimens were examined by hematoxylin and eosin (H&E) staining and by immunohistochemical techniques using antibodies to cytokeratin. One or two sections of each nonsentinel lymph node in ALND specimens were examined by routine H&E staining.
RESULTS: One hundred thirty-four patients underwent ALND (ALND group), and 162 underwent successful SLND followed by completion ALND (SLND group). Both groups were similar with respect to age (median, 55 and 54 years, respectively), palpable primary tumors (54.5% and 59.3%, respectively), palpable axillary nodes (5.2% and 7.4%, respectively), size of primary tumor (median, 1.5 cm in each group), and total number of axillary lymph nodes examined (median, 19 and 21, respectively). The number of patients with axillary metastasis was 39 (29.1%) in the ALND group and 68 (42.0%) in the SLND group (p < 0.03). Of these, 4 of 39 (10.3%) ALND patients (3.0% of all ALND patients) and 26 of 68 (38.2%) SLND patients (16.0% of all SLND patients) had micrometastasis (< or = 2 mm), a highly significant difference (p < 0.0005)
CONCLUSIONS: Sentinel lymphadenectomy with multiple sectioning and immunohistochemical staining of sentinel nodes increases the accuracy of axillary staging in breast cancer and can identify significantly more patients with lymph nodes metastases, especially micrometastases, than can ALND with routine histopathologic processing of lymph nodes.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1995        PMID: 7677468      PMCID: PMC1234825          DOI: 10.1097/00000658-199509000-00016

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Surg        ISSN: 0003-4932            Impact factor:   12.969


  14 in total

1.  Detection and significance of occult axillary node metastases in patients with invasive breast cancer.

Authors:  E R Fisher; S Swamidoss; C H Lee; H Rockette; C Redmond; B Fisher
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  1978-10       Impact factor: 6.860

2.  Occult metastases in the axillary lymph nodes of patients with breast cancer node negative by clinical and histologic examination and conventional histology.

Authors:  Z L Chen; D R Wen; W F Coulson; A E Giuliano; A J Cochran
Journal:  Dis Markers       Date:  1991 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 3.434

3.  What constitutes adequate study of axillary lymph nodes in breast cancer?

Authors:  W B Kingsley; G N Peters; J H Cheek
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1985-03       Impact factor: 12.969

4.  The accuracy of clinical nodal staging and of limited axillary dissection as a determinant of histologic nodal status in carcinoma of the breast.

Authors:  B Fisher; N Wolmark; M Bauer; C Redmond; M Gebhardt
Journal:  Surg Gynecol Obstet       Date:  1981-06

5.  Prognostic significance of cytokeratin-positive breast cancer metastases.

Authors:  D D Sedmak; T A Meineke; D S Knechtges; J Anderson
Journal:  Mod Pathol       Date:  1989-09       Impact factor: 7.842

6.  Lymphatic mapping and sentinel lymphadenectomy for breast cancer.

Authors:  A E Giuliano; D M Kirgan; J M Guenther; D L Morton
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1994-09       Impact factor: 12.969

7.  Axillary micro- and macrometastases in breast cancer: prognostic significance of tumor size.

Authors:  P P Rosen; P E Saigo; D W Braun; E Weathers; A A Fracchia; D W Kinne
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1981-11       Impact factor: 12.969

8.  Axillary node dissection for early breast cancer: some is good, but all is better.

Authors:  F L Moffat; G M Senofsky; K Davis; K C Clark; D S Robinson; A S Ketcham
Journal:  J Surg Oncol       Date:  1992-09       Impact factor: 3.454

9.  Prognostic significance of breast cancer axillary lymph node micrometastases assessed by two special techniques: reevaluation with longer follow-up.

Authors:  I de Mascarel; F Bonichon; J M Coindre; M Trojani
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  1992-09       Impact factor: 7.640

10.  Micrometastases to axillary lymph nodes from carcinoma of breast: detection by immunohistochemistry and prognostic significance.

Authors:  M Trojani; I de Mascarel; F Bonichon; J M Coindre; G Delsol
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  1987-03       Impact factor: 7.640

View more
  113 in total

1.  Lymph node micrometastases in patients with adenocarcinoma of the esophagogastric junction.

Authors:  L Bonavina; S Ferrero; V Midolo; R Buffa; B Cesana; A Peracchia
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  1999 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 3.452

2.  Subareolar versus peritumoral injection of location of sentinel lymph node.

Authors:  J M Guenther
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2000-04       Impact factor: 12.969

3.  Credentialing for breast lymphatic mapping: how many cases are enough?

Authors:  H S Cody; A D Hill; K N Tran; M F Brennan; P I Borgen
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1999-05       Impact factor: 12.969

Review 4.  Complete sectioning of axillary sentinel nodes in patients with breast cancer. Analysis of two different step sectioning and immunohistochemistry protocols in 246 patients.

Authors:  G Cserni
Journal:  J Clin Pathol       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 3.411

5.  Incorporation of sentinel lymph node metastasis size into a nomogram predicting nonsentinel lymph node involvement in breast cancer patients with a positive sentinel lymph node.

Authors:  Elizabeth A Mittendorf; Kelly K Hunt; Judy C Boughey; Roland Bassett; Amy C Degnim; Robyn Harrell; Min Yi; Funda Meric-Bernstam; Merrick I Ross; Gildy V Babiera; Henry M Kuerer; Rosa F Hwang
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2012-01       Impact factor: 12.969

6.  MR imaging-guided axillary node biopsy for breast cancer: initial findings.

Authors:  Takuji Yamagami; Sachiko Yuen; Kiyoshi Sawai; Tsunehiko Nishimura
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2003-06-14       Impact factor: 5.315

7.  Predictors and outcomes of completion axillary node dissection among older breast cancer patients.

Authors:  Sara H Javid; Hao He; Larissa A Korde; David R Flum; Benjamin O Anderson
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2014-03-01       Impact factor: 5.344

8.  Intraoperative imprint cytologic evaluation of sentinel lymph nodes for lobular carcinoma of the breast.

Authors:  Andrew J Creager; Kim R Geisinger; Nancy D Perrier; Perry Shen; Jo Ann Shaw; Peter R Young; Doug Case; Edward A Levine
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 12.969

9.  Identification of sentinel lymph nodes in colon cancer depends on the amount of dye injected relative to tumor size.

Authors:  Carsten T Viehl; Christian T Hamel; Walter R Marti; Ulrich Guller; Lukas Eisner; Uz Stammberger; Luigi Terracciano; Hans P Spichtin; Felix Harder; Markus Zuber
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2003-11-06       Impact factor: 3.352

10.  Staging of the axilla in breast cancer: accurate in vivo assessment using positron emission tomography with 2-(fluorine-18)-fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose.

Authors:  I C Smith; K N Ogston; P Whitford; F W Smith; P Sharp; M Norton; I D Miller; A K Ah-See; S D Heys; J A Jibril; O Eremin
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1998-08       Impact factor: 12.969

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.