Literature DB >> 23771730

Poor self-rated health associated with an increased risk of subsequent development of lung cancer.

Hilde Kristin Refvik Riise1, Trond Riise, Gerd Karin Natvig, Anne Kjersti Daltveit.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Self-rated health has shown to be a strong predictor of mortality and some major chronic diseases. The purpose of this study was to investigate whether poor self-rated health also was related to an increased risk of subsequent development of cancer.
METHODS: Information on self-rated health, life-style factors, and other health-related risk factors was ascertained in a cohort of 25,532 persons participating in the Hordaland Health Study in 1997-1999. Information on development of cancer during 10 years of follow-up was obtained from the Norwegian Cancer Registry. The relationship between self-rated health and development of cancer was examined using Cox regression analysis adjusting for smoking and other life-style factors.
RESULTS: Respondents reporting a poor health showed a non-significant increased risk of overall cancer. Sub-analysis of the four most common types of cancer showed a statistically significant association between self-rated health and lung cancer. The adjusted hazard ratio was 3.88 (95% CI; 0.99, 15.8) for those rating their health as poor compared to very good (p for trend = 0.038). For the other types of cancer, we found a non-significant elevated risk associated with poor self-rated health.
CONCLUSION: Respondents who perceive their health as poor had an increased risk of developing lung cancer also after adjusting for smoking. This suggests that self-rated health reflects a broad range of factors important for development of this cancer type. Nevertheless, due to the explorative analysis of the specific cancer types, these findings need to be repeated before elaborate interpretations can be made.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23771730     DOI: 10.1007/s11136-013-0453-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Qual Life Res        ISSN: 0962-9343            Impact factor:   4.147


  33 in total

Review 1.  Stress-induced immunomodulation: Implications for tumorigenesis.

Authors:  Eric V Yang; Ronald Glaser
Journal:  Brain Behav Immun       Date:  2003-02       Impact factor: 7.217

2.  Meta-analysis of stress-related factors in cancer.

Authors:  James C Coyne; Adelita V Ranchor; Steven C Palmer
Journal:  Nat Rev Clin Oncol       Date:  2010-05       Impact factor: 66.675

Review 3.  Epidemiology - identifying the causes and preventability of cancer?

Authors:  Graham A Colditz; Thomas A Sellers; Edward Trapido
Journal:  Nat Rev Cancer       Date:  2006-01       Impact factor: 60.716

4.  Assessing reliability of a measure of self-rated health.

Authors:  O Lundberg; K Manderbacka
Journal:  Scand J Soc Med       Date:  1996-09

5.  Subjective state of health and survival in elderly adults.

Authors:  G Kaplan; V Barell; A Lusky
Journal:  J Gerontol       Date:  1988-07

6.  Mortality prediction with a single general self-rated health question. A meta-analysis.

Authors:  Karen B DeSalvo; Nicole Bloser; Kristi Reynolds; Jiang He; Paul Muntner
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2005-12-07       Impact factor: 5.128

Review 7.  Epidemiological evidence for a relationship between life events, coping style, and personality factors in the development of breast cancer.

Authors:  P N Butow; J E Hiller; M A Price; S V Thackway; A Kricker; C C Tennant
Journal:  J Psychosom Res       Date:  2000-09       Impact factor: 3.006

Review 8.  Do stress-related psychosocial factors contribute to cancer incidence and survival?

Authors:  Yoichi Chida; Mark Hamer; Jane Wardle; Andrew Steptoe
Journal:  Nat Clin Pract Oncol       Date:  2008-05-20

9.  Health consequences of social-role careers for women: a life-course perspective.

Authors:  B Shadbolt
Journal:  Aust N Z J Public Health       Date:  1996-04       Impact factor: 2.939

10.  What is self-rated health and why does it predict mortality? Towards a unified conceptual model.

Authors:  Marja Jylhä
Journal:  Soc Sci Med       Date:  2009-06-10       Impact factor: 4.634

View more
  6 in total

1.  Are Single-Item Global Ratings Useful for Assessing Health Status?

Authors:  Cathaleene Macias; Paul B Gold; Dost Öngür; Bruce M Cohen; Trishan Panch
Journal:  J Clin Psychol Med Settings       Date:  2015-10-22

2.  Question order sensitivity of subjective well-being measures: focus on life satisfaction, self-rated health, and subjective life expectancy in survey instruments.

Authors:  Sunghee Lee; Colleen McClain; Noah Webster; Saram Han
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2016-04-30       Impact factor: 4.147

3.  Are Leading Risk Factors for Cancer and Mental Disorders Multimorbidity Shared by These Two Individual Conditions in Community-Dwelling Middle-Aged Adults?

Authors:  Xianwen Shang; Allison M Hodge; Wei Peng; Mingguang He; Lei Zhang
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2020-06-26       Impact factor: 6.639

4.  Gender differences in the effect of self-rated health (SRH) on all-cause mortality and specific causes of mortality among individuals aged 50 years and older.

Authors:  Insun Ryou; Yujin Cho; Hyung-Jin Yoon; Minseon Park
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-12-04       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  A cross-sectional study of self-reported general health, lifestyle factors, and disease: the Hordaland Health Study.

Authors:  Randi Jepsen; Tadesse Washo Dogisso; Elin Dysvik; John Roger Andersen; Gerd Karin Natvig
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2014-10-02       Impact factor: 2.984

6.  Self-rated health and venous thromboembolism among middle-aged women: a population-based cohort study.

Authors:  Peter Nymberg; Emelie Stenman; Susanna Calling; Jan Sundquist; Kristina Sundquist; Bengt Zöller
Journal:  J Thromb Thrombolysis       Date:  2020-04       Impact factor: 2.300

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.