Literature DB >> 9601958

Spiral CT angiography and surgical correlations in the evaluation of intracranial aneurysms.

L Preda1, P Gaetani, R Rodriguez y Baena, E M Di Maggio, A La Fianza, R Dore, I Fulle, M Solcia, A Cecchini, L Infuso, R Campani.   

Abstract

We investigated the accuracy of spiral computed tomography angiography (CTA) in the detection and study of intracranial aneurysms by comparing CTA with selective angiograms and surgical findings. Twenty-six patients (9 men and 17 women; mean age 53.1 +/- 1.8 years) with suspected intracranial aneurysms were submitted to CTA (1- to 2-mm slices, pitch 1:1, 24 s, RI = 1) after a conventional CT examination showing subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH) in 19 cases and during neuroradiological investigations performed for other reasons in 7 cases. One hundred twenty to 150 ml iodate contrast agent (0.3-0.4 gI/ml) were injected intravenously at 5 ml/s rate and with 12- to 25-s delay calculated with a preliminary test bolus. Three-dimensional shaded surface display (3D SSD) and maximum intensity projection (MIP) reconstructions were obtained from axial images. Then, within 48 h, all patients were submitted to digital subtraction angiography (DSA), with separate assessment of CTA and DSA findings. Twenty-two aneurysms shown by CTA were confirmed at DSA and surgery (true positives), whereas the vascular lesion was not confirmed at DSA in 2 cases (false positives). The presence of intracranial aneurysms was excluded at both CTA and subsequent DSA in 7 cases (true negatives) and there were no false negatives; sensitivity was 100 %, specificity 77.8 %, and diagnostic accuracy 93.5 %. Computed tomography angiography aneurysm location was confirmed at surgery in all cases, with very high accuracy in assessing the presence of an aneurysm neck (100 %). Computed tomography angiography accurately depicted the aneurysm shape in 20 of 22 cases, but failed to depict its multilobed nature in 2 cases. The mean aneurysm diameter calculated at CTA was 0.99 +/- 0.12 cm vs 1.09 +/- 0.11 cm at surgery (p < 0.01). The present results suggest that the high sensitivity of CTA, if confirmed by further studies, might help in avoiding having to resort to arteriography after negative CTA in SAH patients.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9601958     DOI: 10.1007/s003300050465

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Radiol        ISSN: 0938-7994            Impact factor:   5.315


  13 in total

1.  Relative value of sliding-thin-slab multiplanar reformations and sliding-thin-slab maximum intensity projections as reformatting techniques in multisection CT angiography of the cervicocranial vessels.

Authors:  B B Ertl-Wagner; R Bruening; J Blume; R-T Hoffmann; S Mueller-Schunk; B Snyder; M F Reiser
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2006-01       Impact factor: 3.825

Review 2.  Computer-aided diagnosis in medical imaging: historical review, current status and future potential.

Authors:  Kunio Doi
Journal:  Comput Med Imaging Graph       Date:  2007-03-08       Impact factor: 4.790

3.  Multislice CT angiography.

Authors:  U Joseph Schoepf; Christoph R Becker; Lars K Hofmann; Marco Das; Thomas Flohr; Bernd M Ohnesorge; Bernhard Baumert; Joshua Rolnick; Jean M Allen; Vassilios Raptopoulos
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2003-02-26       Impact factor: 5.315

4.  Interpretation errors in CT angiography of the head and neck and the benefit of double reading.

Authors:  K Lian; A Bharatha; R I Aviv; S P Symons
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2011-09-08       Impact factor: 3.825

5.  Improved arterial visualization in cerebral CT perfusion-derived arteriograms compared with standard CT angiography: a visual assessment study.

Authors:  A M Mendrik; E P A Vonken; G A P de Kort; B van Ginneken; E J Smit; M A Viergever; M Prokop
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2012-05-24       Impact factor: 3.825

6.  Detection and characterization of intracranial aneurysms with 16-channel multidetector row CT angiography: a prospective comparison of volume-rendered images and digital subtraction angiography.

Authors:  D Y Yoon; K J Lim; C S Choi; B M Cho; S M Oh; S K Chang
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2007-01       Impact factor: 3.825

7.  Postoperative 3D angiography in intracranial aneurysms.

Authors:  Hyun-Seung Kang; Moon Hee Han; Bae Ju Kwon; Sung Il Jung; Chang-Wan Oh; Dae Hee Han; Kee-Hyun Chang
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 3.825

8.  What is the most sensitive non-invasive imaging strategy for the diagnosis of intracranial aneurysms?

Authors:  P M White; E Teadsale; J M Wardlaw; V Easton
Journal:  J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry       Date:  2001-09       Impact factor: 10.154

9.  Detection of intracranial aneurysms with multislice CT: comparison with conventional angiography.

Authors:  S Dammert; T Krings; W Moller-Hartmann; E Ueffing; F J Hans; K Willmes; M Mull; A Thron
Journal:  Neuroradiology       Date:  2004-04-23       Impact factor: 2.804

10.  Detection of aneurysms by 64-section multidetector CT angiography in patients acutely suspected of having an intracranial aneurysm and comparison with digital subtraction and 3D rotational angiography.

Authors:  A M McKinney; C S Palmer; C L Truwit; A Karagulle; M Teksam
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2007-12-07       Impact factor: 3.825

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.