BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: To investigate image quality and vascular delineation of multisection CT (MSCT) angiography of the cervicocranial vessels with sliding-thin-slab (STS) maximum intensity projections (MIP) and multiplanar reformations (MPR). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Ten patients examined with a standardized protocol on a 16-section MSCT were included in the study. The data were reformatted as MIP and MPR in 3 planes for each subject; both reformatting techniques were applied in an STS technique with an increment of 3 mm. Images were evaluated independently by 3 blinded readers grading image quality parameters and vascular delineation of supra-aortic arteries and veins. An extension of the Mantel-Haenzel row mean score test was used to compare the distribution of scores for vascular delineation and image quality between STS MIP and STS MPR. RESULTS: STS MIP reformations were significantly superior to STS MPR in the delineation of all extra- and intracranial arteries and arterial segments and in the delineation of the cavernous sinus and the internal cerebral veins (P < .05). No significant differences were found for the large venous vessels, the visual assessment of vascular contrast, or the impact of imaging artifacts. CONCLUSION: Because STS MIP reformations were preferred to or equal to STS MPR in all aspects, we recommend STS MIP as the primary reformatting technique in MSCT angiography of the cervicocranial vessels in addition to viewing the source images.
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: To investigate image quality and vascular delineation of multisection CT (MSCT) angiography of the cervicocranial vessels with sliding-thin-slab (STS) maximum intensity projections (MIP) and multiplanar reformations (MPR). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Ten patients examined with a standardized protocol on a 16-section MSCT were included in the study. The data were reformatted as MIP and MPR in 3 planes for each subject; both reformatting techniques were applied in an STS technique with an increment of 3 mm. Images were evaluated independently by 3 blinded readers grading image quality parameters and vascular delineation of supra-aortic arteries and veins. An extension of the Mantel-Haenzel row mean score test was used to compare the distribution of scores for vascular delineation and image quality between STS MIP and STS MPR. RESULTS: STS MIP reformations were significantly superior to STS MPR in the delineation of all extra- and intracranial arteries and arterial segments and in the delineation of the cavernous sinus and the internal cerebral veins (P < .05). No significant differences were found for the large venous vessels, the visual assessment of vascular contrast, or the impact of imaging artifacts. CONCLUSION: Because STS MIP reformations were preferred to or equal to STS MPR in all aspects, we recommend STS MIP as the primary reformatting technique in MSCT angiography of the cervicocranial vessels in addition to viewing the source images.
Authors: G D Rubin; M C Shiau; A J Schmidt; D Fleischmann; L Logan; A N Leung; R B Jeffrey; S Napel Journal: J Comput Assist Tomogr Date: 1999-11 Impact factor: 1.826
Authors: L Preda; P Gaetani; R Rodriguez y Baena; E M Di Maggio; A La Fianza; R Dore; I Fulle; M Solcia; A Cecchini; L Infuso; R Campani Journal: Eur Radiol Date: 1998 Impact factor: 5.315
Authors: G D Rubin; M D Dake; S Napel; R B Jeffrey; C H McDonnell; F G Sommer; L Wexler; D M Williams Journal: Radiology Date: 1994-01 Impact factor: 11.105
Authors: J Pablo Villablanca; Parizad Hooshi; Neil Martin; Reza Jahan; Gary Duckwiler; Sylvester Lim; John Frazee; Y Pierre Gobin; James Sayre; John Bentson; Fernando Viñuela Journal: J Neurosurg Date: 2002-12 Impact factor: 5.115
Authors: J Linn; B Ertl-Wagner; K C Seelos; M Strupp; M Reiser; H Brückmann; R Brüning Journal: AJNR Am J Neuroradiol Date: 2007-05 Impact factor: 3.825