Literature DB >> 9600130

Patients' views on residual blood use for research purposes.

N Hamajima1, K Tajima, H Oya, T Kato, K Okuma, H Kaneda, S Moritaka, T Kato.   

Abstract

In order to document patients' views on residual blood use for research purposes, a questionnaire survey was conducted at Aichi Cancer Center Hospital in October 1997. Subjects were patients who had undergone blood tests at a central blood sampling room in the morning during the week of the study enrollment. The questionnaire was handed out and collected at a waiting area in front of the blood sampling room. Of the 583 patients to whom we tried to hand out the questionnaire, 558 participated (258 males, 294 females, and 6 of sex unknown) and 25 refused. Those who regarded research to improve health care as important were 76.7% of those sampled. Only 28 patients (5.0%) answered that they would not permit the use of their residual blood for research purposes. Although logistic analysis did not detect significant factors influencing the giving of permission, the percentage who would not permit the use of their residual blood for research purposes was significantly higher in cancer outpatients (6.7%) than in inpatients (1.0%). It seems desirable for hospitals to establish an open policy concerning residual blood use for research purposes.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9600130      PMCID: PMC5921806          DOI: 10.1111/j.1349-7006.1998.tb00568.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Jpn J Cancer Res        ISSN: 0910-5050


  10 in total

1.  Guidelines on ethics for epidemiologists.

Authors:  John M Last
Journal:  Int J Epidemiol       Date:  1990-03       Impact factor: 7.196

2.  Guidelines for the retention, storage, and use of residual dried blood spot samples after newborn screening analysis: statement of the Council of Regional Networks for Genetic Services.

Authors:  B L Therrell; W H Hannon; K A Pass; F Lorey; C Brokopp; J Eckman; M Glass; R Heidenreich; S Kinney; S Kling; G Landenburger; F J Meaney; E R McCabe; S Panny; M Schwartz; E Shapira
Journal:  Biochem Mol Med       Date:  1996-04

3.  What ethical issues are Japanese epidemiologists facing? Results of a questionnaire study for members of the Monbusho Research Committee on evaluation of risk factors for cancer by large-scale cohort study. Subcommittee of Ethical Issues.

Authors: 
Journal:  J Epidemiol       Date:  1996-08       Impact factor: 3.211

4.  Acquired immunodeficiency syndrome. State legislative activity.

Authors:  H E Lewis
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1987-11-06       Impact factor: 56.272

5.  Statement of the American Society of Clinical Oncology: genetic testing for cancer susceptibility, Adopted on February 20, 1996.

Authors: 
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  1996-05       Impact factor: 44.544

6.  Pathologists enter debate on consent for genetic research on stored tissue.

Authors:  J Stephenson
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1996-02-21       Impact factor: 56.272

7.  Patients' views on reference to clinical data.

Authors:  N Hamajima; K Tajima
Journal:  J Epidemiol       Date:  1997-03       Impact factor: 3.211

Review 8.  Informed consent for genetic research on stored tissue samples.

Authors:  E W Clayton; K K Steinberg; M J Khoury; E Thomson; L Andrews; M J Kahn; L M Kopelman; J O Weiss
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1995-12-13       Impact factor: 56.272

9.  Research and stored tissues. Persons as sources, samples as persons?

Authors:  B M Knoppers; C M Laberge
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1995-12-13       Impact factor: 56.272

10.  Informed consent in European multicentre randomised clinical trials--are patients really informed?

Authors:  C J Williams; M Zwitter
Journal:  Eur J Cancer       Date:  1994       Impact factor: 9.162

  10 in total
  3 in total

Review 1.  One-time general consent for research on biological samples.

Authors:  David Wendler
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2006-03-04

2.  A trial of consent procedures for future research with clinically derived biological samples.

Authors:  E Vermeulen; M K Schmidt; N K Aaronson; M Kuenen; M-J Baas-Vrancken Peeters; H van der Poel; S Horenblas; H Boot; V J Verwaal; A Cats; F E van Leeuwen
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2009-09-29       Impact factor: 7.640

3.  Public views on the donation and use of human biological samples in biomedical research: a mixed methods study.

Authors:  Celine Lewis; Margaret Clotworthy; Shona Hilton; Caroline Magee; Mark J Robertson; Lesley J Stubbins; Julie Corfield
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2013-08-07       Impact factor: 2.692

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.