Literature DB >> 7500511

Informed consent for genetic research on stored tissue samples.

E W Clayton1, K K Steinberg, M J Khoury, E Thomson, L Andrews, M J Kahn, L M Kopelman, J O Weiss.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To develop recommendations for obtaining adequate informed consent in the future when gathering tissue samples that may be used for genetic studies and defining the circumstances under which it is necessary to obtain further consent if tissue samples already in hand are to be used for such research. PARTICIPANTS: Scientists, ethicists, lawyers, and consumers selected by the National Center for Human Genome Research and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention to represent a wide array of opinions. EVIDENCE: Statutes, regulations, and cases and articles on law and ethics. CONSENSUS PROCESS: Initial workshop, followed by circulation of several drafts of this document with opportunities for comment by workshop participants and others as well as smaller meetings involving participants with widely differing views.
CONCLUSION: Genetic research using stored tissue samples poses an array of benefits and risks to individuals, researchers, and society. As a result, the workshop participants conclude that (1) informed consent is required for all genetic research using linkable samples unless conditions for limitation or waiver are met; (2) informed consent is not required for genetic research using anonymous samples but may be considered if identifiers are to be removed from currently linkable samples; (3) institutional review boards could usefully review all protocols that propose to use samples for genetic research; and (4) further work regarding these issues is warranted.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Biomedical and Behavioral Research; Centers for Disease Control and Prevention; Genetics and Reproduction; National Institutes of Health; Professional Patient Relationship

Mesh:

Year:  1995        PMID: 7500511

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  JAMA        ISSN: 0098-7484            Impact factor:   56.272


  38 in total

1.  Children of the 90s: ethical guidance for a longitudinal study.

Authors:  S E Mumford
Journal:  Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed       Date:  1999-09       Impact factor: 5.747

Review 2.  Ethical issues raised by genetic testing with oligonucleotide microarrays.

Authors:  Wayne W Grody
Journal:  Mol Biotechnol       Date:  2003-02       Impact factor: 2.695

3.  Pharmacogenetics and pharmacogenomics: recent developments, their clinical relevance and some ethical, social, and legal implications.

Authors:  Paul W Norbert; Allen D Roses
Journal:  J Mol Med (Berl)       Date:  2003-03       Impact factor: 4.599

4.  The relevance of empirical research in bioethics.

Authors:  Franklin G Miller; David Wendler
Journal:  Schizophr Bull       Date:  2005-09-28       Impact factor: 9.306

Review 5.  Genomics and policymaking: from static models to complex systems?

Authors:  Bartha Maria Knoppers
Journal:  Hum Genet       Date:  2009-02-28       Impact factor: 4.132

Review 6.  Informed consent in genomics and genetic research.

Authors:  Amy L McGuire; Laura M Beskow
Journal:  Annu Rev Genomics Hum Genet       Date:  2010       Impact factor: 8.929

7.  ASHG report. Statement on informed consent for genetic research. The American Society of Human Genetics.

Authors: 
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  1996-08       Impact factor: 11.025

8.  Efficacy of a targeted genetic screening program for adolescents.

Authors:  L McCabe
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  1996-10       Impact factor: 11.025

Review 9.  Evolving approaches to the ethical management of genomic data.

Authors:  Jean E McEwen; Joy T Boyer; Kathie Y Sun
Journal:  Trends Genet       Date:  2013-02-28       Impact factor: 11.639

10.  Inherited colorectal polyposis and cancer risk of the APC I1307K polymorphism.

Authors:  R Gryfe; N Di Nicola; G Lal; S Gallinger; M Redston
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  1999-02       Impact factor: 11.025

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.