Literature DB >> 9598509

Hormonal treatment before radical prostatectomy: a 3-year followup.

G Aus1, P A Abrahamsson, G Ahlgren, J Hugosson, S Lundberg, M Schain, S Schelin, K Pedersen.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Hormonal treatment administered before radical prostatectomy has been shown to decrease the rate of positive surgical margins. We determine whether preoperative hormonal treatment has any impact on the subsequent failure rate.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: We prospectively evaluated 122 patients with stages T1bNxM0 to T3aNxM0, grades 1 to 3 prostate cancer, including 64 randomly assigned to immediate radical retropubic prostatectomy and 58 randomly assigned to radical retropubic prostatectomy preceded by 3 months of pretreatment with a gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist. We performed intention to treat analysis on the data with failure defined as lymph node involvement, serum prostate specific antigen greater than 0.5 ng./ml., or the need for postoperative hormonal or radiation adjuvant treatment.
RESULTS: The positive margin rate was 23.6 versus 45.5% in the pretreatment plus prostatectomy versus prostatectomy only groups (p = 0.016). There were 20 failures (34.5%) in the pretreatment plus prostatectomy subgroup and 26 (40.6%) in the prostatectomy only group (p = 0.48). A negative surgical margin was associated with a significantly lower risk of progression than a positive surgical margin (20.8 versus 50.0%, p = 0.0016), and progression was delayed by approximately 1 year after hormonal pretreatment. However, at a median followup of 38 months there was no difference in progression-free survival (p = 0.57).
CONCLUSIONS: Although hormonal pretreatment significantly decreased the positive margin rate, it did not result in any difference in progression-free survival when followup exceeded 3 years. Thus, our current results do not support the routine administration of hormonal treatment before radical prostatectomy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9598509

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Urol        ISSN: 0022-5347            Impact factor:   7.450


  15 in total

Review 1.  Value of endocrine therapy for early and locally advanced prostate cancer.

Authors:  Manfred P Wirth; Michael Froehner
Journal:  Drugs Aging       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 3.923

Review 2.  [Significance of neoadjuvant therapy before radical prostatectomy].

Authors:  R Paul; H Van Randenborgh; H Kübler; M Alschibaja; R Hartung
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 0.639

3.  Phase 2 study of neoadjuvant docetaxel plus bevacizumab in patients with high-risk localized prostate cancer: a Prostate Cancer Clinical Trials Consortium trial.

Authors:  Robert W Ross; Matthew D Galsky; Phil Febbo; Marc Barry; Jerome P Richie; Wanling Xie; Fiona M Fennessy; Rupal S Bhatt; Julia Hayes; Toni K Choueiri; Clare M Tempany; Philip W Kantoff; Mary E Taplin; William K Oh
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2012-01-26       Impact factor: 6.860

4.  Downsizing and prostate cancer.

Authors:  Shandra Wilson
Journal:  Rev Urol       Date:  2004

5.  Intense androgen-deprivation therapy with abiraterone acetate plus leuprolide acetate in patients with localized high-risk prostate cancer: results of a randomized phase II neoadjuvant study.

Authors:  Mary-Ellen Taplin; Bruce Montgomery; Christopher J Logothetis; Glenn J Bubley; Jerome P Richie; Bruce L Dalkin; Martin G Sanda; John W Davis; Massimo Loda; Lawrence D True; Patricia Troncoso; Huihui Ye; Rosina T Lis; Brett T Marck; Alvin M Matsumoto; Steven P Balk; Elahe A Mostaghel; Trevor M Penning; Peter S Nelson; Wanling Xie; Zhenyang Jiang; Christopher M Haqq; Daniel Tamae; NamPhuong Tran; Weimin Peng; Thian Kheoh; Arturo Molina; Philip W Kantoff
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2014-10-13       Impact factor: 44.544

6.  Overview of randomized controlled treatment trials for clinically localized prostate cancer: implications for active surveillance and the United States preventative task force report on screening?

Authors:  Mack Roach; Kimberly Thomas
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr       Date:  2012-12

7.  Assessment of low prostate weight as a determinant of a higher positive margin rate after laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: a prospective pathologic study of 1,500 cases.

Authors:  Peiguo G Chu; Sean K Lau; Lawrence M Weiss; Mark Kawachi; Jeffrey Yoshida; Christopher Ruel; Rebecca Nelson; Laura Crocitto; Timothy Wilson
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2008-09-24       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 8.  Novel approaches in the high-risk prostate cancer patient: Summary of key research presented at AUA 2014.

Authors: 
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2014-07       Impact factor: 1.862

9.  Bicalutamide inhibits androgen-mediated adhesion of prostate cancer cells exposed to ionizing radiation.

Authors:  Tao Wang; Michael R Alavian; Hira Lal Goel; Lucia R Languino; Thomas J Fitzgerald
Journal:  Prostate       Date:  2008-12-01       Impact factor: 4.104

Review 10.  Novel hormonal approaches in prostate cancer.

Authors:  Terence W Friedlander; Charles J Ryan
Journal:  Curr Oncol Rep       Date:  2009-05       Impact factor: 5.075

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.