Literature DB >> 15148572

[Significance of neoadjuvant therapy before radical prostatectomy].

R Paul1, H Van Randenborgh, H Kübler, M Alschibaja, R Hartung.   

Abstract

Neoadjuvant therapy before radical prostatectomy should increase survival in patients. This is necessary especially in patients with adverse prognostic factors for locally advanced disease, because in this stage radical prostatectomy as the only treatment results in a significantly reduced rate of progression-free survival. The aim of neoadjuvant therapy protocols is to increase local tumor control because of possible downstaging effects of the tumor and to improve systemic control because of elimination of circulating tumor cells and possible micrometastases. This review discusses the present and future aspects of neoadjuvant therapies in detail. The neoadjuvant hormonal therapy prior to radical prostatectomy results in a significant downstaging that does not translate into prolonged disease-free survival. This observation was made for short-term (3 months) and long-term (8 months) hormonal therapy. Therefore, neoadjuvant hormonal therapy has only a cosmetic effect on the pathological results and should not be advocated any more. Newer protocols have shown that neoadjuvant chemotherapy or hormone chemotherapy is feasible. The results obtained in non-randomized trials with small numbers of patients do not allow analyzing the efficacy of these protocols. Theoretically, neoadjuvant chemotherapy, especially a taxane-based protocol, which has shown efficacy in hormone-refractory disease, could improve disease outcome. Clinical trials are underway to prove this hypothesis. In the future, new therapeutic strategies could also be used in the neoadjuvant setting. It can only be speculated if antibody protocols or gene therapy will be used in this respect. In conclusion, there is no standard neoadjuvant protocol prior to radical prostatectomy. Whether chemotherapy will set a new standard for care has to be elucidated by the ongoing clinical trials.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15148572     DOI: 10.1007/s00120-004-0582-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Urologe A        ISSN: 0340-2592            Impact factor:   0.639


  36 in total

1.  A preoperative nomogram for disease recurrence following radical prostatectomy for prostate cancer.

Authors:  M W Kattan; J A Eastham; A M Stapleton; T M Wheeler; P T Scardino
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  1998-05-20       Impact factor: 13.506

2.  Duration of neoadjuvant androgen deprivation therapy before radical prostatectomy and disease-free survival in men with prostate cancer.

Authors:  F Meyer; I Bairati; C Bédard; L Lacombe; B Têtu; Y Fradet
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2001-08       Impact factor: 2.649

Review 3.  Ad5CMVp53 gene therapy for locally advanced prostate cancer--where do we stand?

Authors:  P Sweeney; L L Pisters
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2000-04       Impact factor: 4.226

4.  4-Year follow-up results of a European prospective randomized study on neoadjuvant hormonal therapy prior to radical prostatectomy in T2-3N0M0 prostate cancer. European Study Group on Neoadjuvant Treatment of Prostate Cancer.

Authors:  C C Schulman; F M Debruyne; G Forster; F P Selvaggi; A R Zlotta; W P Witjes
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2000-12       Impact factor: 20.096

5.  Phase II trial of neoadjuvant estramustine and etoposide plus radical prostatectomy for locally advanced prostate cancer.

Authors:  P E Clark; D M Peereboom; R Dreicer; H S Levin; S B Clark; E A Klein
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2001-02       Impact factor: 2.649

6.  Randomized, prospective, controlled study comparing radical prostatectomy alone and neoadjuvant androgen withdrawal in the treatment of localized prostate cancer. Canadian Urologic Oncology Group.

Authors:  S L Goldenberg; L H Klotz; J Srigley; M A Jewett; D Mador; Y Fradet; J Barkin; J Chin; J M Paquin; M J Bullock; S Laplante
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  1996-09       Impact factor: 7.450

7.  Phase II study of docetaxel, estramustine, and low-dose hydrocortisone in men with hormone-refractory prostate cancer: a final report of CALGB 9780. Cancer and Leukemia Group B.

Authors:  D M Savarese; S Halabi; V Hars; W L Akerley; M E Taplin; P A Godley; A Hussain; E J Small; N J Vogelzang
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2001-05-01       Impact factor: 44.544

8.  Docetaxel (Taxotere) as monotherapy in the treatment of hormone-refractory prostate cancer: preliminary results.

Authors:  J Picus; M Schultz
Journal:  Semin Oncol       Date:  1999-10       Impact factor: 4.929

9.  Randomized prospective study comparing radical prostatectomy alone versus radical prostatectomy preceded by androgen blockade in clinical stage B2 (T2bNxM0) prostate cancer. The Lupron Depot Neoadjuvant Prostate Cancer Study Group.

Authors:  M S Soloway; R Sharifi; Z Wajsman; D McLeod; D P Wood; A Puras-Baez
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  1995-08       Impact factor: 7.450

10.  Histologic changes in prostate carcinomas treated with leuprolide (luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone effect). Distinction from poor tumor differentiation.

Authors:  D M Smith; W M Murphy
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  1994-03-01       Impact factor: 6.860

View more
  1 in total

1.  [Regressive changes after short-term neoadjuvant antihormonal therapy in prostatic carcinoma: the value of Gleason grading].

Authors:  R Grobholz; A Riester; C G Sauer; M Siegsmund
Journal:  Pathologe       Date:  2006-02       Impact factor: 1.011

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.