Literature DB >> 9597355

Why do infants make A not B errors in a search task, yet show memory for the location of hidden objects in a nonsearch task?

A Ahmed1, T Ruffman.   

Abstract

In 4 experiments, infants aged 8 to 12 months were tested on A not B search tasks, and nonsearch A not B tasks following the violation-of-expectation paradigm. A 1-location task and 2 control tasks were also conducted. In the nonsearch tasks, a toy was hidden in A, moved to B, and retrieved after a delay from either A (impossible) or B (possible). Results showed significantly longer looking times at impossible events, indicating some memory for where the object was hidden and an expectation of where it should be found. This effect occurred at delays at which infants made the A not B error when searching, and at a longer delay of 15 s. The results showed clearly that infants have some memory for the object's location, even at delays at which they search at the incorrect location. Discussion centers on how these results are accounted for within explanations of the A not B error.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9597355     DOI: 10.1037//0012-1649.34.3.441

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Dev Psychol        ISSN: 0012-1649


  10 in total

1.  Can infants be "taught" to attend to a new physical variable in an event category? The case of height in covering events.

Authors:  Su-hua Wang; Renée Baillargeon
Journal:  Cogn Psychol       Date:  2008-01-03       Impact factor: 3.468

2.  Attentional Predictors of 5-month-olds' Performance on a Looking A-not-B Task.

Authors:  Stuart Marcovitch; Melissa W Clearfield; Margaret Swingler; Susan D Calkins; Martha Ann Bell
Journal:  Infant Child Dev       Date:  2015-08-15

3.  Looking and touching: what extant approaches reveal about the structure of early word knowledge.

Authors:  Kristi Hendrickson; Samantha Mitsven; Diane Poulin-Dubois; Pascal Zesiger; Margaret Friend
Journal:  Dev Sci       Date:  2014-11-28

4.  Where is the real cheese? Young children's ability to discriminate between real and pretend Acts.

Authors:  Lili Ma; Angeline S Lillard
Journal:  Child Dev       Date:  2006 Nov-Dec

5.  Young infants' reasoning about physical events involving inert and self-propelled objects.

Authors:  Yuyan Luo; Lisa Kaufman; Renée Baillargeon
Journal:  Cogn Psychol       Date:  2009-02-20       Impact factor: 3.468

Review 6.  A hierarchical competing systems model of the emergence and early development of executive function.

Authors:  Stuart Marcovitch; Philip David Zelazo
Journal:  Dev Sci       Date:  2009-01

7.  Infants use compression information to infer objects' weights: examining cognition, exploration, and prospective action in a preferential-reaching task.

Authors:  Petra Hauf; Markus Paulus; Renée Baillargeon
Journal:  Child Dev       Date:  2012-08-02

8.  Perseverative responding in a violation-of-expectation task in 6.5-month-old infants.

Authors:  Andréa Aguiar; Renée Baillargeon
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  2003-07

9.  Investigating looking and social looking measures as an index of infant violation of expectation.

Authors:  Kirsty Dunn; J Gavin Bremner
Journal:  Dev Sci       Date:  2016-10-26

Review 10.  Comparable measures of cognitive function in human infants and laboratory animals to identify environmental health risks to children.

Authors:  Carolyn Sharbaugh; Susan Marie Viet; Alexa Fraser; Suzanne B McMaster
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 9.031

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.