Literature DB >> 16490140

Differentiation between serological responses to Brucella suis and Yersinia enterocolitica serotype O:9 after natural or experimental infection in pigs.

G Jungersen1, V Sørensen, S B Giese, J A Stack, U Riber.   

Abstract

False-positive serological reactions (FPSR) due to infections with Yersinia enterocolitica serotype Oratio9 (YeOratio9) are a problem in tests for brucellosis. In the present study, FPSR in classical and novel tests for brucellosis following experimental infections of pigs with YeOratio9 were compared with responses of B. suis biovar 2-inoculated pigs. FPSR were limited to 2-9 weeks post-YeOratio9 inoculation, while B. suis-infected pigs were test-positive throughout the 21-week period of investigation. Although YeOratio9-inoculated pigs exhibited FPSR in Brucella tests for a limited period of time, the serological responses in a YeOratio9-purified O-antigen indirect ELISA did not decrease accordingly. Analysis of available cross-sectional serum samples from pig herds naturally infected with YeOratio9 or B. suis biovar 2 confirmed that the observed difference in the duration of the serological responses between the two infections could be used to discriminate between herds infected with B. suis biovar 2 and YeOratio9.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16490140      PMCID: PMC2870402          DOI: 10.1017/S095026880500511X

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Epidemiol Infect        ISSN: 0950-2688            Impact factor:   2.451


  15 in total

1.  Antibody response to experimental Salmonella typhimurium infection in chickens measured by ELISA.

Authors:  J O Hassan; P A Barrow; A P Mockett; S Mcleod
Journal:  Vet Rec       Date:  1990-05-26       Impact factor: 2.695

2.  How to substantiate eradication of bovine brucellosis when aspecific serological reactions occur in the course of brucellosis testing.

Authors:  Jacques Godfroid; Claude Saegerman; Vincent Wellemans; Karl Walravens; Jean-Jacques Letesson; Anne Tibor; Alastair Mc Millan; Steve Spencer; Moëz Sanna; Douwe Bakker; Régis Pouillot; Bruno Garin-Bastuji
Journal:  Vet Microbiol       Date:  2002-12-20       Impact factor: 3.293

3.  Monoclonal antibodies and characterization of epitopes of smooth Brucella lipopolysaccharides.

Authors:  I Greiser-Wilke; V Moennig
Journal:  Ann Inst Pasteur Microbiol       Date:  1987 Sep-Oct

4.  Definition of Brucella A and M epitopes by monoclonal typing reagents and synthetic oligosaccharides.

Authors:  D R Bundle; J W Cherwonogrodzky; M A Gidney; P J Meikle; M B Perry; T Peters
Journal:  Infect Immun       Date:  1989-09       Impact factor: 3.441

Review 5.  Brucellosis in wildlife.

Authors:  J Godfroid
Journal:  Rev Sci Tech       Date:  2002-08       Impact factor: 1.181

6.  Specific bovine brucellosis diagnosis based on in vitro antigen-specific gamma interferon production.

Authors:  V Weynants; J Godfroid; B Limbourg; C Saegerman; J J Letesson
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1995-03       Impact factor: 5.948

7.  Structure of the O-chain of the phenol-phase soluble cellular lipopolysaccharide of Yersinia enterocolitica serotype O:9.

Authors:  M Caroff; D R Bundle; M B Perry
Journal:  Eur J Biochem       Date:  1984-02-15

8.  Detection of Brucella melitensis and Brucella abortus by DNA amplification.

Authors:  G G Baily; J B Krahn; B S Drasar; N G Stoker
Journal:  J Trop Med Hyg       Date:  1992-08

9.  Validation of FPA and cELISA for the detection of antibodies to Brucella abortus in cattle sera and comparison to SAT, CFT, and iELISA.

Authors:  J A McGiven; J D Tucker; L L Perrett; J A Stack; S D Brew; A P MacMillan
Journal:  J Immunol Methods       Date:  2003-07       Impact factor: 2.303

10.  Immunoblot studies in the differential diagnosis of porcine brucellosis: an immunodominant 62 kDa protein is related to the mycobacterial 65 kDa heat shock protein (HSP-65).

Authors:  S A Spencer; E S Broughton; S Hamid; D B Young
Journal:  Vet Microbiol       Date:  1994-03       Impact factor: 3.293

View more
  7 in total

1.  Evaluation of competitive ELISA for detection of antibodies to Brucella infection in domestic animals.

Authors:  Lorraine L Perrett; John A McGiven; Simon D Brew; Judy A Stack
Journal:  Croat Med J       Date:  2010-08       Impact factor: 1.351

2.  Improving the specificity of immunodiagnosis for porcine brucellosis.

Authors:  R E Thirlwall; N J Commander; S D Brew; S J Cutler; J A McGiven; J A Stack
Journal:  Vet Res Commun       Date:  2007-10-13       Impact factor: 2.459

3.  Loci Associated With Antibody Response in Feral Swine (Sus scrofa) Infected With Brucella suis.

Authors:  Courtney F Pierce; Vienna R Brown; Steven C Olsen; Paola Boggiatto; Kerri Pedersen; Ryan S Miller; Scott E Speidel; Timothy J Smyser
Journal:  Front Vet Sci       Date:  2020-11-25

4.  Development of a Multiplex Bead Assay to Detect Serological Responses to Brucella Species in Domestic Pigs and Wild Boar with the Potential to Overcome Cross-Reactivity with Yersinia enterocolitica O:9.

Authors:  Antonia Touloudi; John McGiven; Shaun Cawthraw; George Valiakos; Polychronis Kostoulas; Lucy Duncombe; Christian Gortázar; Mariana Boadella; Marina Sofia; Zoi Athanasakopoulou; Dimitris C Chatzopoulos; Vassiliki Spyrou; Liljana Petrovska; Charalambos Billinis
Journal:  Microorganisms       Date:  2022-07-06

5.  Brucella melitensis B115-based ELISA to unravel false positive serologic reactions in bovine brucellosis: a field study.

Authors:  Adriana Trotta; Mariarosaria Marinaro; Margie Cirilli; Alessio Sposato; Rosanna Adone; Matteo Beverelli; Domenico Buonavoglia; Marialaura Corrente
Journal:  BMC Vet Res       Date:  2020-02-11       Impact factor: 2.741

6.  Vaccine safety studies of Brucella abortus S19 and S19ΔvjbR in pregnant swine.

Authors:  Slim Zriba; Daniel G Garcia-Gonzalez; Omar H Khalaf; Lance Wheeler; Sankar P Chaki; Allison Rice-Ficht; Thomas A Ficht; Angela M Arenas-Gamboa
Journal:  Vaccine X       Date:  2019-08-22

7.  MALDI-TOF MS and genomic analysis can make the difference in the clarification of canine brucellosis outbreaks.

Authors:  David Attuy Vey da Silva; Holger Brendebach; Josephine Grützke; Ralf Dieckmann; Rodrigo Martins Soares; Julia Teresa Ribeiro de Lima; Lara Borges Keid; Dirk Hofreuter; Sascha Al Dahouk
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-11-06       Impact factor: 4.379

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.