Literature DB >> 9076391

Assessment of coronary reserve by transoesophageal Doppler echocardiography. Direct comparison between different modalities of dipyridamole and adenosine administration.

M Kozàkovà1, C Palombo, L Pratali, G Bigalli, M Marzilli, A Distante, A L'Abbate.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: This study was undertaken to compare the coronary vasodilator response to different application modalities of intravenous vasodilators, in order to identify the optimal pharmacological protocol for the evaluation of coronary reserve by means of transoesophageal Doppler echocardiography.
METHODS: Blood flow velocity in the left anterior descending artery, coronary vascular resistance and left main coronary artery cross-sectional area were assessed by transoesophageal echo-Doppler during an i.v. adenosine bolus (5 mg), a 5-min adenosine infusion (infusion rate 140 micrograms. kg-1 min-1), and low (0.56 mg.kg-1. 4 min-1), and high-dose (0.84 mg.kg-1.9 min-1) dipyridamole infusions in 10 healthy normals (Group 1) and in 20 patients (Group 2) with either coronary microvascular disease (11 patients) or coronary artery disease (nine patients).
RESULTS: In both groups, the highest flow velocity and the lowest coronary vascular resistance were observed during the adenosine infusion. Flow velocity values and indices of coronary vasodilator capacity observed after the adenosine bolus and the high-dose dipyridamole infusion were very close to those obtained during the adenosine infusion, especially in Group 1. Coronary flow velocity was lower and coronary vascular resistance higher after low-dose dipyridamole, significantly in Group 2. The maximal flow response to the adenosine bolus was observed within a few seconds after the injection, and was very short. The peak response to the adenosine infusion was observed 57 +/- 27 s after its start. The coronary flow velocity response to dipyridamole was dose dependent and differed between Groups 1 and 2.
CONCLUSION: In combination with transoesophageal Doppler echocardiography, a short-lasting adenosine infusion at a rate of 140 micrograms.kg-1.min-1 seems to be preferable to an adenosine bolus and dipyridamole infusion. The effect of the bolus is too short for an accurate measurement of coronary flow velocity, while the dipyridamole infusion, especially at a low dose, induces a submaximal vasodilator response.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9076391     DOI: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.eurheartj.a015274

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Heart J        ISSN: 0195-668X            Impact factor:   29.983


  4 in total

1.  Time-dependent variation in coronary flow velocity reserve induced by adenosine triphosphate: comparison to low-dose dipyridamole.

Authors:  Atsushi Takagi; Azusa Furugen; Kotaro Arai; Kazue Gunji; Hiromi Hoshi; Yoshimi Yagishita; Futoshi Suzuki; Kyomi Ashihara; Nobuhisa Hagiwara
Journal:  J Echocardiogr       Date:  2012-01-28

Review 2.  [Methods for coronary functional assessment].

Authors:  M Elsner
Journal:  Herz       Date:  1998-03       Impact factor: 1.443

3.  Prognostic value of coronary flow reserve assessed by transthoracic Doppler echocardiography on long-term outcome in asymptomatic patients with type 2 diabetes without overt coronary artery disease.

Authors:  Takayuki Kawata; Masao Daimon; Rei Hasegawa; Tomohiko Toyoda; Tai Sekine; Toshiharu Himi; Daigaku Uchida; Sakiko Miyazaki; Kuniaki Hirose; Ryoko Ichikawa; Masaki Maruyama; Hiromasa Suzuki; Hiroyuki Daida
Journal:  Cardiovasc Diabetol       Date:  2013-08-27       Impact factor: 9.951

4.  Usefulness of coronary flow reserve measured by transthoracic coronary Doppler ultrasound in the elderly.

Authors:  Danijela Trifunovic; Edina Cenko; Concetta Torromeo; Beatrice Ricci; Michele Schiariti; Marija Zdravkovic; Zorana Vasiljevic; Olivia Manfrini
Journal:  J Geriatr Cardiol       Date:  2017-07       Impact factor: 3.327

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.