Literature DB >> 9590528

In vitro and in vivo study of pluripotency in intraspecific hybrid cells obtained by fusion of murine embryonic stem cells with splenocytes.

N M Matveeva1, A G Shilov, E M Kaftanovskaya, L P Maximovsky, A I Zhelezova, A N Golubitsa, S I Bayborodin, M M Fokina, O L Serov.   

Abstract

Hypoxanthine phosphoribosyltransferase-deficient (HPRT-) mouse embryonic stem (ES) cells, HM-1 cells (genotype XY), were fused with adult female DD/c mouse spleen cells. As a result, a set of HAT-resistant clones was isolated. Four hybrid clones most similar in morphology and growth characteristics to the HM-1 cells were studied in detail with respect to their pluripotency. Of these, three clones contained 41-43 chromosomes, and one clone was nearly tetraploid. All the clones had the XXY set of sex chromosomes and expressed the HPRT of the somatic partner only. The hybrid clones shared features with the HM-1 cells, indicating that they retained their pluripotent properties: (1) embryonic ECMA-7 antigen, not TROMA-1 antigen, was present in most cells; (2) the hybrid cells showed high activity of endogenous alkaline phosphatase (AP); (3) all the hybrid clones were able to form complex embryoid bodies containing derivatives of all the embryonic germinal layers; (4) the hybrid cells contained synchronously replicating X chromosomes, indicating that they were in an active state; and (5) a set of chimeric animals was generated by injecting hybrid cells into BALB/c and C57BL/6J mouse blastocysts. Evidence for chimerism was provided by the spotted coat derived from 129/Ola mice and identification of 129/Ola glucose phosphate isomerase (GPI) in many organs. Thus the results obtained demonstrated that the hybrid cells retain their high pluripotency level despite the close contact of the "pluripotent" HM-1 genome with the "somatic" spleen cell genome during hybrid cell formation and the presence of the "somatic" X chromosome during many cell generations. The presence of HPRT of the somatic partner in many organs and tissues, including the testes in chimeric animals, shows that the "somatic" X chromosome segregates weakly, if at all, during development of the chimeras. There were no individuals with the 129/Ola genotype among the more than 50 offspring from chimeric mice. The lack of the 129/Ola genotype is explained by the imbalance of the sex chromosomes in the hybrid cells rendering the passage of hybrid cell descendants through meiosis in chimeras impossible. As a result, chimeras become unable to produce gametes of the hybrid cell genotype.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9590528     DOI: 10.1002/(SICI)1098-2795(199806)50:2<128::AID-MRD2>3.0.CO;2-M

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mol Reprod Dev        ISSN: 1040-452X            Impact factor:   2.609


  22 in total

1.  From intestine to muscle: nuclear reprogramming through defective cloned embryos.

Authors:  J A Byrne; S Simonsson; J B Gurdon
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2002-04-23       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Segregation of parental chromosomes in hybrid cells obtained by fusion between embryonic stem cells and differentiated cells of adult animal.

Authors:  N M Matveeva; S B Kuznetsov; E M Kaftanovskaya; O L Serov
Journal:  Dokl Biol Sci       Date:  2001 Jul-Aug

3.  H3K9 histone acetylation predicts pluripotency and reprogramming capacity of ES cells.

Authors:  Hadas Hezroni; Itai Tzchori; Anna Davidi; Anna Mattout; Alva Biran; Malka Nissim-Rafinia; Heiner Westphal; Eran Meshorer
Journal:  Nucleus       Date:  2011-07-01       Impact factor: 4.197

4.  Hypoxic stress and IL-7 gene overexpression enhance the fusion potential of rat bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells with bovine renal epithelial cells.

Authors:  Rakhshinda Habib; Kanwal Haneef; Nadia Naeem; Irfan Khan; Siddiqua Jamall; Asmat Salim
Journal:  Mol Cell Biochem       Date:  2015-02-10       Impact factor: 3.396

5.  Hybrid cells generated by fusion of embryonic stem cells with di- and tetraploid fibroblasts have alternative parental phenotypes.

Authors:  A A Kruglova; M M Gridina; N M Matveeva; O L Serov
Journal:  Dokl Biol Sci       Date:  2008 Sep-Oct

6.  Efficiencies and mechanisms of nuclear reprogramming.

Authors:  V Pasque; K Miyamoto; J B Gurdon
Journal:  Cold Spring Harb Symp Quant Biol       Date:  2010-11-03

Review 7.  Reprogramming somatic gene activity by fusion with pluripotent cells.

Authors:  Jeong Tae Do; Dong Wook Han; Hans R Schöler
Journal:  Stem Cell Rev       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 5.739

Review 8.  Cell fusion for reprogramming pluripotency: toward elimination of the pluripotent genome.

Authors:  Danièle Pralong; Alan O Trounson; Paul J Verma
Journal:  Stem Cell Rev       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 5.739

9.  Chromosomal and telomeric reprogramming following ES-somatic cell fusion.

Authors:  Huseyin Sumer; Craig Nicholls; Alexander R Pinto; Dinesh Indraharan; Jun Liu; Mei Ling Lim; Jun-Ping Liu; Paul J Verma
Journal:  Chromosoma       Date:  2009-11-11       Impact factor: 4.316

10.  [Fate of parental mitochondria in embryonic stem hybrid cells].

Authors:  A G Menzorov; N M Matveeva; D M Larkin; D V Zaykin; O L Serov
Journal:  Tsitologiia       Date:  2008
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.