Literature DB >> 17848720

Cell fusion for reprogramming pluripotency: toward elimination of the pluripotent genome.

Danièle Pralong1, Alan O Trounson, Paul J Verma.   

Abstract

Embryonic stem cell (ESC) technology should enable the generation of specific cell types for the study and treatment of human diseases. Therapeutic cloning provides a way to generate ESCs genetically matched to diseased individuals through nuclear reprogramming of the somatic genome. However, practical and ethical limitations associated with therapeutic cloning are calling for the development of oocyte- and-embryo-free alternatives for obtaining of autologous pluripotent cells for transplantation therapy. An alternative approach to reprogram the somatic genome involves fusion between somatic and pluripotent cells. Potential fusion partners with reprogramming activities include embryonal carcinoma cells, embryonic germ cells, and ESCs. Experimental evidence is now available, which demonstrates that mouse and human somatic cells can be reprogrammed by fusion to form pluripotent hybrid cells. Recent progress infusion-based reprogramming is reviewed with reference to the developmental potency of hybrid cells as well as genetic and epigenetic correlates of reprogramming. However, hybrid cells lack therapeutic potential because of their abnormal ploidy and the presence of nonautologous genes from the pluripotent parent. We discuss the potential of fusion-based reprogramming for the generation of diploid, autologous pluripotent cells using two alternative routes: the enucleation of ESCs and the fusion of such cytoplasts to somatic cell karyoplasts or intact somatic cells, and the selective elimination of the pluripotent genome following fusion to the somatic partner. Finally, these approaches are discussed in the light of recent progress showing that overexpression of embryonic transcription factors can restore a state of pluripotency to somatic cells.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 17848720     DOI: 10.1007/bf02698060

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Stem Cell Rev        ISSN: 1550-8943            Impact factor:   5.739


  66 in total

1.  Cloning: mining the secrets of the egg.

Authors:  Carina Dennis
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2006-02-09       Impact factor: 49.962

2.  Viable offspring derived from fetal and adult mammalian cells.

Authors:  I Wilmut; A E Schnieke; J McWhir; A J Kind; K H Campbell
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1997-02-27       Impact factor: 49.962

3.  Embryonic germ cells induce epigenetic reprogramming of somatic nucleus in hybrid cells.

Authors:  M Tada; T Tada; L Lefebvre; S C Barton; M A Surani
Journal:  EMBO J       Date:  1997-11-03       Impact factor: 11.598

4.  Incomplete reactivation of Oct4-related genes in mouse embryos cloned from somatic nuclei.

Authors:  Alex Bortvin; Kevin Eggan; Helen Skaletsky; Hidenori Akutsu; Deborah L Berry; Ryuzo Yanagimachi; David C Page; Rudolf Jaenisch
Journal:  Development       Date:  2003-04       Impact factor: 6.868

5.  Nuclear reprogramming of somatic cells by in vitro hybridization with ES cells.

Authors:  M Tada; Y Takahama; K Abe; N Nakatsuji; T Tada
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2001-10-02       Impact factor: 10.834

6.  Human embryonic stem cell lines derived from single blastomeres.

Authors:  Irina Klimanskaya; Young Chung; Sandy Becker; Shi-Jiang Lu; Robert Lanza
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2006-08-23       Impact factor: 49.962

7.  Epigenetic reprogramming in mouse primordial germ cells.

Authors:  Petra Hajkova; Sylvia Erhardt; Natasha Lane; Thomas Haaf; Osman El-Maarri; Wolf Reik; Jörn Walter; M Azim Surani
Journal:  Mech Dev       Date:  2002-09       Impact factor: 1.882

8.  Nuclei of adult mammalian somatic cells are directly reprogrammed to oct-4 stem cell gene expression by amphibian oocytes.

Authors:  James A Byrne; Stina Simonsson; Patrick S Western; John B Gurdon
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2003-07-15       Impact factor: 10.834

9.  Reprogramming in inter-species embryonal carcinoma-somatic cell hybrids induces expression of pluripotency and differentiation markers.

Authors:  Marzena Flasza; Andrew F Shering; Kath Smith; Peter W Andrews; Polly Talley; Penny A Johnson
Journal:  Cloning Stem Cells       Date:  2003

10.  Cybrid formation in mouse L cells: the influence of cytoplast-to-cell ratio.

Authors:  C L Bunn; J M Eisenstadt
Journal:  Somatic Cell Genet       Date:  1977-05
View more
  6 in total

1.  A microfluidic chip for highly efficient cell capturing and pairing.

Authors:  Shaoyan Cui; Yaoping Liu; Wei Wang; Yan Sun; Yubo Fan
Journal:  Biomicrofluidics       Date:  2011-09-20       Impact factor: 2.800

2.  Reprogramming to a muscle fate by fusion recapitulates differentiation.

Authors:  Jason H Pomerantz; Semanti Mukherjee; Adam T Palermo; Helen M Blau
Journal:  J Cell Sci       Date:  2009-04-01       Impact factor: 5.285

3.  Efficiencies and mechanisms of nuclear reprogramming.

Authors:  V Pasque; K Miyamoto; J B Gurdon
Journal:  Cold Spring Harb Symp Quant Biol       Date:  2010-11-03

4.  Comparison of reprogramming genes in induced pluripotent stem cells and nuclear transfer cloned embryos.

Authors:  Lian Duan; Zhendong Wang; Jingling Shen; Zhiyan Shan; Xinghui Shen; Yanshuang Wu; Ruizhen Sun; Tong Li; Rui Yuan; Qiaoshi Zhao; Guangyu Bai; Yanli Gu; Lianhong Jin; Lei Lei
Journal:  Stem Cell Rev Rep       Date:  2014-08       Impact factor: 5.739

Review 5.  Induced pluripotent stem cell: A headway in reprogramming with promising approach in regenerative biology.

Authors:  N Rawat; M K Singh
Journal:  Vet World       Date:  2017-06-14

Review 6.  Virus-Induced Membrane Fusion in Neurodegenerative Disorders.

Authors:  Carolina Osorio; Adonis Sfera; Jonathan J Anton; Karina G Thomas; Christina V Andronescu; Erica Li; Rayan W Yahia; Andrea García Avalos; Zisis Kozlakidis
Journal:  Front Cell Infect Microbiol       Date:  2022-03-24       Impact factor: 6.073

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.