Literature DB >> 18437369

Manual asymmetries in grasp pre-shaping and transport-grasp coordination.

Jarugool Tretriluxana1, James Gordon, Carolee J Winstein.   

Abstract

Few studies have directly compared the visuo-motor transformation of grasp pre-shaping or transport-grasp coordination of reach-to-grasp movements between the two hands. Our objective was to determine if there are manual asymmetries in right-handed adults as a foundation to investigate hemispheric specialization in individuals post-stroke. Twelve non-disabled right-handed adults performed rapid reach-to-grasp movements to cylinders of three sizes as vision of the arm and hand was partially occluded. We reasoned that the hand system (left or right) that is superior in anticipatory planning of aperture scaling and movement preparation would be more likely to exhibit early grasp pre-shaping under this experimental manipulation. Movement time, hand path, transport velocity, and aperture were derived from 3D electromagnetic sensor data. The visuo-motor transformation of object sizes into an action of aperture pre-shaping was quantified using the correlations between initial aperture velocity and object diameter, and peak aperture and object diameter. Coordination between hand transport and aperture grasping was quantified using the cross-correlation between transport velocity and aperture size. Peak aperture and object diameter were strongly correlated for both hands. However, early aperture velocity and object diameter were correlated only for left-hand movements. Cross-correlation analyses revealed a strong association between transport velocity and aperture only for right-hand movements. Together, these results suggest earlier anticipatory control for the left hand in the visuo-motor transformation of grasp pre-shaping and a stronger transport-grasp linkage for the right hand. Further, initial aperture velocity was a more sensitive measure of these manual asymmetries than peak aperture. Our findings compliment the specialization previously observed for pointing movements of the dominant and non-dominant hemispheric/limb system and the coordinated control of complex movements and visuo-spatial components, respectively.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18437369     DOI: 10.1007/s00221-008-1364-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Brain Res        ISSN: 0014-4819            Impact factor:   1.972


  53 in total

1.  Differences in control of limb dynamics during dominant and nondominant arm reaching.

Authors:  R L Sainburg; D Kalakanis
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2000-05       Impact factor: 2.714

2.  Evidence for a dynamic-dominance hypothesis of handedness.

Authors:  Robert L Sainburg
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2001-11-22       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Handedness: dominant arm advantages in control of limb dynamics.

Authors:  Leia B Bagesteiro; Robert L Sainburg
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2002-11       Impact factor: 2.714

4.  Grasp size and accuracy of approach in reaching.

Authors:  A M Wing; A Turton; C Fraser
Journal:  J Mot Behav       Date:  1986-09       Impact factor: 1.328

5.  Individual differences in lateralization: effects of gender and handedness.

Authors:  Z Eviatar; J B Hellige; E Zaidel
Journal:  Neuropsychology       Date:  1997-10       Impact factor: 3.295

6.  Dissociating the role of ventral and dorsal premotor cortex in precision grasping.

Authors:  Marco Davare; Michael Andres; Guy Cosnard; Jean-Louis Thonnard; Etienne Olivier
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2006-02-22       Impact factor: 6.167

7.  Influence of different types of grasping on the transport component of prehension movements.

Authors:  M Gentilucci; U Castiello; M L Corradini; M Scarpa; C Umiltà; G Rizzolatti
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  1991       Impact factor: 3.139

8.  Involvement of the ipsilateral motor cortex in finger movements of different complexities.

Authors:  R Chen; C Gerloff; M Hallett; L G Cohen
Journal:  Ann Neurol       Date:  1997-02       Impact factor: 10.422

9.  Right-hand superiority for throwing but not for intercepting.

Authors:  N V Watson; D Kimura
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  1989       Impact factor: 3.139

10.  Effects of unilateral brain damage on the control of goal-directed hand movements.

Authors:  C J Winstein; P S Pohl
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1995       Impact factor: 1.972

View more
  13 in total

1.  The inimitable mouth: task-dependent kinematic differences are independent of terminal precision.

Authors:  Jason W Flindall; Claudia L R Gonzalez
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2017-03-21       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Kinematics of ventrally mediated grasp-to-eat actions: right-hand advantage is dependent on dorsal stream input.

Authors:  Clarissa Beke; Jason W Flindall; Claudia L R Gonzalez
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2018-03-27       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Measurement structure of the Wolf Motor Function Test: implications for motor control theory.

Authors:  Michelle Woodbury; Craig A Velozo; Paul A Thompson; Kathye Light; Gitendra Uswatte; Edward Taub; Carolee J Winstein; David Morris; Sarah Blanton; Deborah S Nichols-Larsen; Steven L Wolf
Journal:  Neurorehabil Neural Repair       Date:  2010-07-08       Impact factor: 3.919

4.  What is simulated in the action observation network when we observe actions?

Authors:  Alice Neal; James M Kilner
Journal:  Eur J Neurosci       Date:  2010-10-19       Impact factor: 3.386

5.  Bimanual coordination during reach-to-grasp actions is sensitive to task goal with distinctions between left- and right-hemispheric stroke.

Authors:  Tessa Johnson; Gordon Ridgeway; Dustin Luchmee; Joshua Jacob; Shailesh Kantak
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2022-07-23       Impact factor: 2.064

6.  The heavier the arm, the higher the action: the effects of forearm-weight changes on reach-to-grasp movements.

Authors:  Luna Ando; Yoshihiro Itaguchi
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2022-03-23       Impact factor: 1.972

7.  Cortical activations in humans grasp-related areas depend on hand used and handedness.

Authors:  Chiara Begliomini; Cristian Nelini; Andrea Caria; Wolfgang Grodd; Umberto Castiello
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2008-10-10       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 8.  The contributions of vision and haptics to reaching and grasping.

Authors:  Kayla D Stone; Claudia L R Gonzalez
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2015-09-16

9.  Improvement in Paretic Arm Reach-to-Grasp following Low Frequency Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Depends on Object Size: A Pilot Study.

Authors:  Jarugool Tretriluxana; Shailesh Kantak; Suradej Tretriluxana; Allan D Wu; Beth E Fisher
Journal:  Stroke Res Treat       Date:  2015-11-17

10.  "Left neglected," but only in far space: spatial biases in healthy participants revealed in a visually guided grasping task.

Authors:  Natalie de Bruin; Devon C Bryant; Claudia L R Gonzalez
Journal:  Front Neurol       Date:  2014-01-22       Impact factor: 4.003

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.