OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to retrospectively analyze the reasons for the failure of radiosurgical treatment of cerebral arteriovenous malformations (AVMs). METHODS: Seventeen cases of noncured AVMs were reviewed 3 years after radiosurgical treatment. Follow-up ranged from 33 to 54 months (mean, 44.3 mo). Lesion dimensions varied from 9 to 55 mm (mean, 29.2 mm). The lesions were located in critical or near-critical brain regions. Angiography was performed under Talairach's stereotactic conditions. Two large AVMs bled 36 and 39 months after receiving irradiation, respectively. These two AVMs had been incompletely irradiated. RESULTS: Retrospectively, in four cases (23.5%) we observed errors in determining AVM target shape and size because of inaccurate definition of the nidus and/or because of stereoangiographic incompleteness (absence of external carotid artery injections). In five large and/or irregularly shaped AVMs (29.4%), a strategy of partial volume irradiation had been used. In one patient (5.8%), we observed the recanalization of previously embolized AVMs. In another case (5.8%), the target had been partially missed. The AVMs in one case (5.8%) had been treated with an ineffective peripheral dose. In one (5.8%), the failure occurred because of the lesion angio-architecture. In four cases (23.5%), no evident reasons for failure were determined. CONCLUSION: The results of this study suggest the necessity of complete irradiation of the nidus. The strategy of partial volume irradiation might be avoided, even if it necessitates lowering the doses to treat large AVMs. Accuracy in the target determination is required, and complete stereoangiography is necessary.
OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to retrospectively analyze the reasons for the failure of radiosurgical treatment of cerebral arteriovenous malformations (AVMs). METHODS: Seventeen cases of noncured AVMs were reviewed 3 years after radiosurgical treatment. Follow-up ranged from 33 to 54 months (mean, 44.3 mo). Lesion dimensions varied from 9 to 55 mm (mean, 29.2 mm). The lesions were located in critical or near-critical brain regions. Angiography was performed under Talairach's stereotactic conditions. Two large AVMs bled 36 and 39 months after receiving irradiation, respectively. These two AVMs had been incompletely irradiated. RESULTS: Retrospectively, in four cases (23.5%) we observed errors in determining AVM target shape and size because of inaccurate definition of the nidus and/or because of stereoangiographic incompleteness (absence of external carotid artery injections). In five large and/or irregularly shaped AVMs (29.4%), a strategy of partial volume irradiation had been used. In one patient (5.8%), we observed the recanalization of previously embolized AVMs. In another case (5.8%), the target had been partially missed. The AVMs in one case (5.8%) had been treated with an ineffective peripheral dose. In one (5.8%), the failure occurred because of the lesion angio-architecture. In four cases (23.5%), no evident reasons for failure were determined. CONCLUSION: The results of this study suggest the necessity of complete irradiation of the nidus. The strategy of partial volume irradiation might be avoided, even if it necessitates lowering the doses to treat large AVMs. Accuracy in the target determination is required, and complete stereoangiography is necessary.
Authors: Mina G Safain; Jason P Rahal; Ami Raval; Mark J Rivard; John E Mignano; Julian K Wu; Adel M Malek Journal: Neurosurgery Date: 2014-06 Impact factor: 4.654
Authors: Tonghe Wang; Yang Lei; Sibo Tian; Xiaojun Jiang; Jun Zhou; Tian Liu; Sean Dresser; Walter J Curran; Hui-Kuo Shu; Xiaofeng Yang Journal: Med Phys Date: 2019-05-21 Impact factor: 4.071
Authors: Ahmed J Awad; Brian P Walcott; Christopher J Stapleton; Dale Ding; Cheng-Chia Leed; Jay S Loeffler Journal: J Clin Neurosci Date: 2015-04-23 Impact factor: 1.961
Authors: Jun Kang; Judy Huang; Philippe Gailloud; Daniele Rigamonti; Michael Lim; Vincent Bernard; Tina Ehtiati; Eric C Ford Journal: Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys Date: 2014-07-08 Impact factor: 7.038
Authors: J Stancanello; C Cavedon; P Francescon; P Cerveri; G Ferrigno; F Causin; F Colombo Journal: Med Biol Eng Comput Date: 2005-09 Impact factor: 3.079
Authors: Jan Vesper; B Bölke; C Wille; P A Gerber; C Matuschek; M Peiper; H J Steiger; W Budach; G Lammering Journal: Eur J Med Res Date: 2009-03-17 Impact factor: 2.175