Literature DB >> 24584136

Use of cone-beam computed tomography angiography in planning for gamma knife radiosurgery for arteriovenous malformations: a case series and early report.

Mina G Safain1, Jason P Rahal, Ami Raval, Mark J Rivard, John E Mignano, Julian K Wu, Adel M Malek.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The effectiveness of Gamma Knife radiosurgery (GKR) for cerebral arteriovenous malformations (AVMs) is predicated on inclusion of the entire nidus while excluding normal tissue. As such, GKR may be limited by the resolution and accuracy of the imaging modality used in targeting.
OBJECTIVE: We present the first case series to demonstrate the feasibility of using ultrahigh-resolution C-arm cone-beam computed tomography angiography (CBCT-A) in AVM targeting.
METHODS: From June 2009 to June 2013, CBCT-A was used for targeting of all patients with AVMs treated with GKR at our institution. Patients underwent Leksell stereotactic head frame placement followed by catheter-based biplane 2-dimensional digital subtraction angiography, 3-dimensional rotational angiography, as well as CBCT-A. The CBCT-A dataset was used for stereotactic planning for GKR. Patients were followed at 1, 3, 6, and 12 months and then annually thereafter.
RESULTS: CBCT-A-based targeting was used in 22 consecutive patients. CBCT-A provided detailed spatial resolution and sensitivity of nidal angioarchitecture enabling treatment. The average radiation dose to the margin of the AVM nidus corresponding to the 50% isodose line was 15.6 Gy. No patient had treatment-associated hemorrhage. At early follow-up (mean, 16 months), 84% of patients had a decreasing or obliterated AVM nidus.
CONCLUSION: CBCT-A-guided radiosurgery is feasible and useful because it provides sufficient detailed resolution and sensitivity for imaging brain AVMs.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24584136      PMCID: PMC4028381          DOI: 10.1227/NEU.0000000000000331

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neurosurgery        ISSN: 0148-396X            Impact factor:   4.654


  55 in total

1.  Assessment of distortion in a three-dimensional rotational angiography system.

Authors:  R R Bridcut; R J Winder; A Workman; P Flynn
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2002-03       Impact factor: 3.039

2.  Early draining vein occlusion after gamma knife surgery for arteriovenous malformations.

Authors:  Chun-Po Yen; Mohamad A Khaled; Lucia Schwyzer; Matjaz Vorsic; Aaron S Dumont; Ladislau Steiner
Journal:  Neurosurgery       Date:  2010-11       Impact factor: 4.654

3.  Analysis of treatment failure after radiosurgery for arteriovenous malformations.

Authors:  T L Ellis; W A Friedman; F J Bova; P S Kubilis; J M Buatti
Journal:  J Neurosurg       Date:  1998-07       Impact factor: 5.115

4.  Risk of rebleeding in arteriovenous malformations due to impaired venous drainage after radiosurgery.

Authors:  Motoaki Fujimoto; Junji Uno; Yoshiaki Ikai; Satoshi Inoha; Yasutoshi Kai; Kazushi Maeda; Shintaro Nagaoka; So Tokunaga; Hidefuku Gi
Journal:  Neurol Med Chir (Tokyo)       Date:  2011       Impact factor: 1.742

5.  Integration of three-dimensional rotational angiography in radiosurgical treatment planning of cerebral arteriovenous malformations.

Authors:  Alfredo Conti; Antonio Pontoriero; Giuseppe Faragò; Federica Midili; Carmelo Siragusa; Francesca Granata; Antonio Pitrone; Costantino De Renzis; Marcello Longo; Francesco Tomasello
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2011-02-23       Impact factor: 7.038

6.  Quality assurance in fractionated stereotactic radiotherapy.

Authors:  A P Warrington; R W Laing; M Brada
Journal:  Radiother Oncol       Date:  1994-03       Impact factor: 6.280

7.  Gamma knife radiosurgery for arteriovenous malformations: long-term follow-up results focusing on complications occurring more than 5 years after irradiation.

Authors:  M Yamamoto; M Jimbo; M Hara; I Saito; K Mori
Journal:  Neurosurgery       Date:  1996-05       Impact factor: 4.654

8.  Salvage retreatment after failure of radiosurgery in patients with arteriovenous malformations.

Authors:  Kelly D Foote; William A Friedman; Thomas L Ellis; Frank J Bova; John M Buatti; Sanford L Meeks
Journal:  J Neurosurg       Date:  2003-02       Impact factor: 5.115

9.  Benefit of cone-beam computed tomography angiography in acute management of angiographically undetectable ruptured arteriovenous malformations.

Authors:  Jason P Rahal; Adel M Malek
Journal:  J Neurosurg       Date:  2013-05-17       Impact factor: 5.115

10.  Clinical significance of 3D reconstruction of arteriovenous malformation using digital subtraction angiography and its modification with CT information in stereotactic radiosurgery.

Authors:  Xiao-Qing Zhang; Hiroki Shirato; Hidefumi Aoyama; Satoshi Ushikoshi; Takeshi Nishioka; Da-Zhen Zhang; Kazuo Miyasaka
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2003-12-01       Impact factor: 7.038

View more
  3 in total

1.  ART 3.5D: an algorithm to label arteries and veins from three-dimensional angiography.

Authors:  Beatrice Barra; Elena De Momi; Giancarlo Ferrigno; Guglielmo Pero; Francesco Cardinale; Giuseppe Baselli
Journal:  J Med Imaging (Bellingham)       Date:  2016-11-29

2.  Selective and super-selective C-arm based cone beam CT angiography (CBCTA) with DynaCT for CyberKnife radiosurgery planning of intracranial arteriovenous malformations (AVMs).

Authors:  Oliver Edwin Holmes; Janos Szanto; Vered Tsehmaister Abitbul; Taleb Al Mansoori; Hanan Al-Qahtani; John Sinclair; Daniela Iancu; Shawn Malone
Journal:  J Radiosurg SBRT       Date:  2018

3.  Frameless Co-Registration of Biplane 2D Digital Subtraction Angiography Whole Frames and 3D Rotational Angiography-Based Cone-Beam Computed Tomography Angiogram on Dedicated Software for Stereotactic Radiosurgery of Cranial Vascular Malformations.

Authors:  Kazuhiro Ohtakara; Takashi Izumi; Kuniaki Tanahashi; Takeshi Kamomae; Kojiro Suzuki
Journal:  Cureus       Date:  2022-08-14
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.