Literature DB >> 9584430

Presenting two incongruent color words on a single trial does not alter Stroop interference.

C M MacLeod1, S L Hodder.   

Abstract

Two experiments showed that having two incongruent words present on a single Stroop trial (e.g., both red and green in blue, say "blue") did not alter interference relative to having only one incongruent word. This was true whether the two incongruent words were presented successively at several stimulus onset asynchronies (Experiment 1) or simultaneously in adjacent positions (Experiment 2). We argue that the first word captures attention and "locks out" others, preventing additional interference.

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9584430     DOI: 10.3758/bf03201134

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mem Cognit        ISSN: 0090-502X


  9 in total

Review 1.  On the control of automatic processes: a parallel distributed processing account of the Stroop effect.

Authors:  J D Cohen; K Dunbar; J L McClelland
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  1990-07       Impact factor: 8.934

2.  Individual differences in Stroop dilution: tests of the attention-capture hypothesis.

Authors:  P L Yee; E Hunt
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1991-08       Impact factor: 3.332

3.  The Stroop phenomenon and its use in the stlldy of perceptual, cognitive, and response processes.

Authors:  F N Dyer
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  1973-06

4.  Using confidence intervals in within-subject designs.

Authors:  G R Loftus; M E Masson
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  1994-12

Review 5.  Strategies and models of selective attention.

Authors:  A M Treisman
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  1969-05       Impact factor: 8.934

6.  Categories of interference: verbal mediation and conflict in card sorting.

Authors:  J Morton
Journal:  Br J Psychol       Date:  1969-08

7.  Tests of the automaticity of reading: dilution of Stroop effects by color-irrelevant stimuli.

Authors:  D Kahneman; D Chajczyk
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1983-08       Impact factor: 3.332

8.  Time course analysis of the Stroop phenomenon.

Authors:  M O Glaser; W R Glaser
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1982-12       Impact factor: 3.332

9.  Attention and automaticity in Stroop and priming tasks: theory and data.

Authors:  G D Logan
Journal:  Cogn Psychol       Date:  1980-10       Impact factor: 3.468

  9 in total
  5 in total

1.  Presenting two color words on a single Stroop trial: evidence for joint influence, not capture.

Authors:  Colin M MacLeod; Douglas A Bors
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2002-07

2.  Size congruity effects with two-digit numbers: expanding the number line?

Authors:  Daniel Fitousi; Daniel Algom
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2006-03

3.  The role of awareness in anticipation and recall performance in the Hebb repetition paradigm: implications for sequence learning.

Authors:  Katherine Guérard; Jean Saint-Aubin; Pierre Boucher; Sébastien Tremblay
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2011-08

4.  Training on integrated versus separated Stroop tasks: the progression of interference and facilitation.

Authors:  C M MacLeod
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  1998-03

5.  The Stroop effect: it is not the robust phenomenon that you have thought it to be.

Authors:  M Dishon-Berkovits; D Algom
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2000-12
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.