Literature DB >> 9581124

What makes people study more? An evaluation of factors that affect self-paced study.

J Dunlosky1, K W Thiede.   

Abstract

Allocation of study time across items was investigated in three experiments. According to the norm-affects-allocation hypothesis, when studying an item, a person changes the sought-after degree of learning for the item (called the norm of study) in an attempt to achieve task goals. As the norm of study is increased, more time will be allocated for study. This hypothesis was evaluated by having people pace their study of items for an eventual test of recall. As predicted, study time was greater (a) when points awarded for recalling an item increased, (b) when instructions emphasized mastering each item rather than quickly learning each item, (c) when points deducted for each second of study decreased, and (d) when the likelihood an item would be on the test increased. Also, although allocating more study time was usually accompanied by an increase in eventual recall, under several conditions people's allocation of study time appeared sub-optimal. Discussion focuses on current theory of self-paced study and people's apparent sub-optimal allocation of study time.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9581124     DOI: 10.1016/s0001-6918(97)00051-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Psychol (Amst)        ISSN: 0001-6918


  15 in total

1.  On the effectiveness of self-paced learning.

Authors:  Jonathan G Tullis; Aaron S Benjamin
Journal:  J Mem Lang       Date:  2011-02-01       Impact factor: 3.059

2.  Are first impressions lasting impressions? An exploration of the generality of the primacy effect in memory for repetitions.

Authors:  Jeremy K Miller; Deanne L Westerman; Marianne E Lloyd
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2004-12

3.  Consequences of restudy choices in younger and older learners.

Authors:  Jonathan G Tullis; Aaron S Benjamin
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2012-08

4.  Metacognition and learning about primacy and recency effects in free recall: the utilization of intrinsic and extrinsic cues when making judgments of learning.

Authors:  Alan D Castel
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2008-03

5.  Do people use category-learning judgments to regulate their learning of natural categories?

Authors:  Kayla Morehead; John Dunlosky; Nathaniel L Foster
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2017-11

Review 6.  Strategies for Improving Learner Metacognition in Health Professional Education.

Authors:  Melissa S Medina; Ashley N Castleberry; Adam M Persky
Journal:  Am J Pharm Educ       Date:  2017-05       Impact factor: 2.047

7.  When do learners shift from habitual to agenda-based processes when selecting items for study?

Authors:  Robert Ariel; John Dunlosky
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2013-04

8.  Metamemory monitoring and control following retrieval practice for text.

Authors:  Jeri L Little; Mark A McDaniel
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2015-01

9.  Metacognition of the testing effect: guiding learners to predict the benefits of retrieval.

Authors:  Jonathan G Tullis; Jason R Finley; Aaron S Benjamin
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2013-04

10.  When enough is not enough: Information overload and metacognitive decisions to stop studying information.

Authors:  Kou Murayama; Adam B Blake; Tyson Kerr; Alan D Castel
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2015-11-23       Impact factor: 3.051

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.