Literature DB >> 25135813

Metamemory monitoring and control following retrieval practice for text.

Jeri L Little1, Mark A McDaniel.   

Abstract

Test-taking is assumed to help learners diagnose what they do and do not know, and by so doing improve the effectiveness of their subsequent study. Previous work has examined metamemory monitoring (e.g., predictions of future performance) and control (e.g., restudy decisions) following testing or retrieval practice with relatively simple materials (e.g., word pairs). There is reason to believe, however, that such monitoring and control decisions might be more difficult with text materials, even after retrieval practice, owing perhaps to difficulty in accurately assessing one's performance on the retrieval-practice test. In two experiments, participants read texts about world regions, then engaged in retrieval practice or rereading of the information in those texts, made estimates about future performance, and then received an opportunity to restudy the texts before taking a final recall test, with self-paced restudy enabling an examination of control processes. Memory predictions were more accurate in the retrieval-practice than in the rereading condition, and learners in both conditions allocated restudy time on the basis of their predictions. Additionally, restudy provided a greater benefit following retrieval practice than following rereading. The present study has implications for how students can use retrieval practice with text to foster subsequent learning.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25135813     DOI: 10.3758/s13421-014-0453-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mem Cognit        ISSN: 0090-502X


  33 in total

1.  The influence of delaying judgments of learning on metacognitive accuracy: a meta-analytic review.

Authors:  Matthew G Rhodes; Sarah K Tauber
Journal:  Psychol Bull       Date:  2011-01       Impact factor: 17.737

2.  Age differences in rereading.

Authors:  Elizabeth A L Stine-Morrow; Danielle D Gagne; Daniel G Morrow; Barbara Herman DeWall
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2004-07

3.  Individual differences, rereading, and self-explanation: concurrent processing and cue validity as constraints on metacomprehension accuracy.

Authors:  Thomas D Griffin; Jennifer Wiley; Keith W Thiede
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2008-01

4.  Metacomprehension for educationally relevant materials: dramatic effects of encoding-retrieval interactions.

Authors:  Ayanna K Thomas; Mark A McDaniel
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2007-04

5.  A new readability yardstick.

Authors:  R FLESCH
Journal:  J Appl Psychol       Date:  1948-06

6.  Metacognitive control and strategy selection: deciding to practice retrieval during learning.

Authors:  Jeffrey D Karpicke
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Gen       Date:  2009-11

7.  Metacognitive and control strategies in study-time allocation.

Authors:  L K Son; J Metcalfe
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2000-01       Impact factor: 3.051

8.  Allocation of self-paced study time and the "labor-in-vain effect".

Authors:  T O Nelson; R J Leonesio
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  1988-10       Impact factor: 3.051

9.  A comparison of current measures of the accuracy of feeling-of-knowing predictions.

Authors:  T O Nelson
Journal:  Psychol Bull       Date:  1984-01       Impact factor: 17.737

10.  Unsuccessful retrieval attempts enhance subsequent learning.

Authors:  Nate Kornell; Matthew Jensen Hays; Robert A Bjork
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2009-07       Impact factor: 3.051

View more
  6 in total

1.  Improving encoding strategies as a function of test knowledge and experience.

Authors:  Benjamin C Storm; Michelle L Hickman; Elizabeth L Bjork
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2016-05

2.  The puzzle of study time allocation for the most challenging items.

Authors:  Monika Undorf; Rakefet Ackerman
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2017-12

3.  Multiple-choice pretesting potentiates learning of related information.

Authors:  Jeri L Little; Elizabeth Ligon Bjork
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2016-10

4.  Exploring the Consequences on Memory of Students Who Know They Have Access to Recorded Lectures.

Authors:  Bianka Patel; Grace Yook; Sarah Mislan; Adam M Persky
Journal:  Am J Pharm Educ       Date:  2019-06       Impact factor: 2.047

5.  Monitoring and control processes in mock witnesses in under-represented non-WEIRD samples with high or low educational level.

Authors:  Karlos Luna; Sara Cadavid; Inés Botía
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2022-03-29

6.  Development of Children's monitoring and control when learning from texts: effects of age and test format.

Authors:  Martina Steiner; Mariëtte H van Loon; Natalie S Bayard; Claudia M Roebers
Journal:  Metacogn Learn       Date:  2019-09-07
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.