Literature DB >> 9579789

Olfaction in rats with extensive lesions of the olfactory bulbs: implications for odor coding.

X C Lu1, B M Slotnick.   

Abstract

Rats were initially trained on a series of odor detection tasks and then received a unilateral olfactory bulbectomy and removal of different parts of the contralateral bulb. After postoperative recovery they were tested for detection of different concentrations of four odors, on a series of odor discrimination tasks and for their ability to acquire a relatively easy and a more difficult odor mixture discrimination task. Groups were formed based on which region of the bulb was intact (regional savings score) and on amount of bulb intact (bulbar savings score). In general, only rats with bulbar savings scores of less than 21% had deficits in detection or discrimination tasks but most performed as well as controls in most tasks. Correlations between bulbar savings scores and error scores were relatively low across all rats but, within the subgroup with the largest lesions (bulbar savings scores <21%), high correlations between these variables were obtained. There was no evidence for a specific anosmia in any group or individual rat and, except for the more difficult odor mixture discrimination, no one task proved difficult for any subgroup. The present results demonstrate that rats with relatively small remnants of one olfactory bulb can perform a variety of odor detection and discrimination tasks as well or nearly as well as controls. These outcomes provide no support for localization of function within the olfactory bulb but are in accord with recent proposals that odors may be coded by a highly distributed pattern of bulbar input.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9579789     DOI: 10.1016/s0306-4522(97)00520-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuroscience        ISSN: 0306-4522            Impact factor:   3.590


  27 in total

1.  Chemical determinants of the rat electro-olfactogram.

Authors:  J W Scott; T Brierley; F H Schmidt
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2000-06-15       Impact factor: 6.167

2.  Odor maps of aldehydes and esters revealed by functional MRI in the glomerular layer of the mouse olfactory bulb.

Authors:  Fuqiang Xu; Nian Liu; Ikuhiro Kida; Douglas L Rothman; Fahmeed Hyder; Gordon M Shepherd
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2003-09-08       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Accessory olfactory bulb function is modulated by input from the main olfactory epithelium.

Authors:  Burton Slotnick; Diego Restrepo; Heather Schellinck; Georgina Archbold; Stephen Price; Weihong Lin
Journal:  Eur J Neurosci       Date:  2010-03-08       Impact factor: 3.386

4.  Classification of odorants across layers in locust olfactory pathway.

Authors:  Pavel Sanda; Tiffany Kee; Nitin Gupta; Mark Stopfer; Maxim Bazhenov
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2016-02-10       Impact factor: 2.714

5.  Functional rehabilitation of cadmium-induced neurotoxicity despite persistent peripheral pathophysiology in the olfactory system.

Authors:  Lindsey A Czarnecki; Andrew H Moberly; Daniel J Turkel; Tom Rubinstein; Joseph Pottackal; Michelle C Rosenthal; Elizabeth F K McCandlish; Brian Buckley; John P McGann
Journal:  Toxicol Sci       Date:  2012-01-27       Impact factor: 4.849

6.  A method for the rapid automated assessment of olfactory function.

Authors:  Steven L Youngentob
Journal:  Chem Senses       Date:  2005-03-01       Impact factor: 3.160

7.  Predicting odorant quality perceptions from multidimensional scaling of olfactory bulb glomerular activity patterns.

Authors:  Steven L Youngentob; Brett A Johnson; Michael Leon; Paul R Sheehe; Paul F Kent
Journal:  Behav Neurosci       Date:  2006-12       Impact factor: 1.912

Review 8.  Chemotopic odorant coding in a mammalian olfactory system.

Authors:  Brett A Johnson; Michael Leon
Journal:  J Comp Neurol       Date:  2007-07-01       Impact factor: 3.215

9.  Encoding of mixtures in a simple olfactory system.

Authors:  Kai Shen; Sina Tootoonian; Gilles Laurent
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2013-11-07       Impact factor: 17.173

10.  Spontaneous versus reinforced olfactory discriminations.

Authors:  Christiane Linster; Brett A Johnson; Alix Morse; Esther Yue; Michael Leon
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2002-08-15       Impact factor: 6.167

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.