Literature DB >> 12134211

Changes in technologist productivity with implementation of an enterprisewide PACS.

Bruce Reiner1, Eliot Siegel, Mary Scanlon.   

Abstract

The purpose of this report is to determine what effect filmless operation has on technologist productivity when compared with traditional film-based operation. Retrospective data on technologist productivity was collected from the study institution before and after implementation of PACS using workload reports and payroll records. Departmentwide technologist productivity was defined as the number of examinations per full-time equivalent (exams/FTE) and correlated with local and nationwide standards operating in traditional film-based operations. During film-based operation, technologist productivity was comparable between the study institution and nationwide standards, allowing for the unique examination volumes and modality mix. After implementation of a large-scale PACS, technologist productivity was found to increase 34% above that of national standards and 48% that of the local control site. Implementation of an enterprisewide PACS offers the potential to significantly improve departmentwide technologist productivity when compared with traditional film-based operation.

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12134211      PMCID: PMC3946080          DOI: 10.1007/s10278-002-0999-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Digit Imaging        ISSN: 0897-1889            Impact factor:   4.056


  11 in total

1.  Transmission failure rate for computed tomography examinations in a filmless imaging department.

Authors:  B Reiner; E Siegel; P Kuzmak; S Severance
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2000-05       Impact factor: 4.056

2.  Evaluation of personnel savings through PACS: a modelling approach.

Authors:  R P van der Loo; E M van Gennip
Journal:  Int J Biomed Comput       Date:  1992-05

3.  Effect of film-based versus filmless operation on the productivity of CT technologists.

Authors:  B I Reiner; E L Siegel; F J Hooper; D Glasser
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1998-05       Impact factor: 11.105

4.  Productivity standards for technologists: how to use them.

Authors:  M L Janower
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1988-01       Impact factor: 11.105

5.  Is cost containment for real?

Authors:  E Ginzberg
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1986-07-11       Impact factor: 56.272

6.  Making filmless radiology work.

Authors:  E L Siegel; J N Diaconis; S Pomerantz; R Allman; B Briscoe
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  1995-11       Impact factor: 4.056

7.  Radiology workload system for diagnostic radiology. Productivity enhancement studies.

Authors:  D W MacEwan
Journal:  J Can Assoc Radiol       Date:  1982-09

8.  Effect of filmless imaging on the utilization of radiologic services.

Authors:  B I Reiner; E L Siegel; C Flagle; F J Hooper; R E Cox; M Scanlon
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2000-04       Impact factor: 11.105

9.  Radiology work-load measurements reflecting variables specific to hospital, patient, and examination: results of a collaborative study.

Authors:  M G Trisolini; S B Boswell; S K Johnson; B J McNeil
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1988-01       Impact factor: 11.105

10.  Radiology department management system: technologists' costs.

Authors:  B J McNeil; A Sapienza; J Van Gerpen; C R Sheriff; A E Gillis; D J Sack; A L Komaroff
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1985-07       Impact factor: 11.105

View more
  8 in total

Review 1.  Evolution of the digital revolution: a radiologist perspective.

Authors:  Bruce I Reiner; Eliot L Siegel; Khan Siddiqui
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2004-01-30       Impact factor: 4.056

2.  Maintaining quality control using a radiological digital X-ray dashboard.

Authors:  Todd R Minnigh; Jacqueline Gallet
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2008-02-13       Impact factor: 4.056

3.  A General Framework for Monitoring Image Acquisition Workflow in the Radiology Environment: Timeliness for Acute Stroke CT Imaging.

Authors:  Timothy P Szczykutowicz; Christina L Brunnquell; Gregory D Avey; Carrie Bartels; Daryn S Belden; Richard J Bruce; Aaron S Field; Walter W Peppler; Peter Wasmund; Gary Wendt
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2018-04       Impact factor: 4.056

4.  Virtual organization of hospital medical imaging: a user satisfaction survey.

Authors:  Claude Sicotte; Guy Paré; Kobena Kra Bini; Marie-Pierre Moreault; Guy Laverdure
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2009-07-09       Impact factor: 4.056

5.  Study of Radiologic Technologists' Perceptions of Picture Archiving and Communication System (PACS) Competence and Educational Issues in Western Australia.

Authors:  Daniel M Floyd; Errol R Trepp; Maryam Ipaki; Curtise K C Ng
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2015-06       Impact factor: 4.056

6.  Effect of Implementation of Picture Archiving and Communication System on Radiologist Reporting Time and Utilization of Radiology Services: A Case Study in Iran.

Authors:  Najmeh Hasani; AghaFatemeh Hosseini; Abbas Sheikhtaheri
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2020-06       Impact factor: 4.056

7.  A survey of digital radiography practice in four South African teaching hospitals: an illuminative study.

Authors:  T Nyathi; Tf Chirwa; Dg van der Merwe
Journal:  Biomed Imaging Interv J       Date:  2010-01-01

8.  Analog to digital workflow improvement: a quantitative study.

Authors:  Catherine Wideman; Jacqueline Gallet
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 4.056

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.