Literature DB >> 9577393

Perceptual and oculomotor effects of neck muscle vibration in vestibular neuritis. Ipsilateral somatosensory substitution of vestibular function.

M Strupp1, V Arbusow, M Dieterich, W Sautier, T Brandt.   

Abstract

Afferent cervical somatosensory input may substitute for absent vestibular information as part of central vestibular compensation after unilateral peripheral vestibular deficit. In order to determine the particular contribution of neck muscle spindles to the perception of body orientation and to the oculomotor system, we measured (i) the subjective visual straight ahead (SVA) by psychophysical tests and (ii) the changes in eye position by video-nystagmography during unilateral stimulation of the posterior neck muscles by vibration (100 Hz). Twenty-five patients with subacute unilateral vestibular lesion (vestibular neuritis) and 25 controls participated in the study. Vibration elicited a horizontal displacement of SVA towards the side of stimulation in all subjects. Mean displacement (+/- SD) was 3.28 +/- 2.96 degrees for right-side and 3.45 +/- 2.93 degrees for left-side stimulation in controls. Muscle stimulation on the patients' lesion side induced a significantly higher displacement (11.51 +/- 6.63 degrees) than contralateral stimulation (3.04 +/- 2.95 degrees, P < 0.01, paired Student's t test). The mean difference during stimulation between the two sides in the patients was 8.02 +/- 5.52 degrees; in the controls, however, it was only 0.74 +/- 0.47 degree (P < 0.001, Student's t test). This asymmetry increased gradually in patients over a period of weeks, reaching a maximum at days 60-80 and declining thereafter. Videonystagmography revealed that ipsilateral stimulation in patients induced large horizontal eye deviations of up to 25 degrees towards the side of the lesion (9.1 +/- 7.6 degrees, n = 18). Contralateral stimulation induced only small shifts, which were within the range of controls. The correlation coefficient between displacement of the SVA and change in eye position was high (r = 0.94, P < 0.0001), indicating that the shift of SVA is the perceptual correlate of the directional change of gaze in space. This interpretation was supported by two control experiments in which the subject was required to (i) indicate the subjective straight ahead by finger-pointing with the eyes closed and (ii) adjust SVA when looking through horizontally reversing prisms. Vibration of neck muscles caused almost no displacement of the SVA when it was indicated by pointing with the eyes closed, but reversed the direction of the displacement if the subject wore reversing prisms. In summary, our data showed: (i) an increase in muscle spindle input following unilateral vestibular lesion; (ii) this increase is asymmetrical, restricted to the affected side, and gradually builds up over weeks; and (iii) the perceived effects during vibration are secondary to changes in eye position rather than changes in cortical representation of body orientation. This is the first study to demonstrate a unilateral increase in somatosensory weight, which substitutes for missing vestibular input.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9577393     DOI: 10.1093/brain/121.4.677

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Brain        ISSN: 0006-8950            Impact factor:   13.501


  19 in total

1.  Effects of neck muscle vibration on subjective visual vertical: comparative analysis with effects on nystagmus.

Authors:  Tetsuaki Kawase; Atsuko Maki; Yusuke Takata; Hiromitsu Miyazaki; Toshimitsu Kobayashi
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2010-12-23       Impact factor: 2.503

2.  Microstimulation of the somatosensory cortex can substitute for vibrissa stimulation during Pavlovian conditioning.

Authors:  Rocio Leal-Campanario; José María Delgado-García; Agnès Gruart
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2006-06-16       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Parameters of skull vibration-induced nystagmus in normal subjects.

Authors:  Enrique García Zamora; Pedro Espírito-Santo Araújo; Vanesa Pérez Guillén; María Fernanda Vargas Gamarra; Victoria Fornés Ferrer; Magdalena Courel Rauch; Herminio Pérez Garrigues
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2018-06-01       Impact factor: 2.503

4.  Different effects of head tilt on ocular vestibular-evoked myogenic potentials in response to bone-conducted vibration and air-conducted sound.

Authors:  Shinichi Iwasaki; Yasuhiro Chihara; Naoya Egami; Chisato Fujimoto; Toshihisa Murofushi; Tatsuya Yamasoba
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2012-09-25       Impact factor: 1.972

5.  Short latency responses in the averaged electro-oculogram elicited by vibrational impulse stimuli applied to the skull: could they reflect vestibulo-ocular reflex function?

Authors:  P Jombík; V Bahýl
Journal:  J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 10.154

6.  Sensitivity and specificity of mastoid vibration test in detection of effects of vestibular neuritis.

Authors:  D Nuti; M Mandalà
Journal:  Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 2.124

7.  Neck muscle vibration alters visually perceived roll in normals.

Authors:  George J McKenna; Grace C Y Peng; David S Zee
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2003-10-16

8.  Mastoid Vibration Affects Dynamic Postural Control During Gait.

Authors:  Jung Hung Chien; Mukul Mukherjee; Nicholas Stergiou
Journal:  Ann Biomed Eng       Date:  2016-02-01       Impact factor: 3.934

9.  Vestibular-related frontal cortical areas and their roles in smooth-pursuit eye movements: representation of neck velocity, neck-vestibular interactions, and memory-based smooth-pursuit.

Authors:  Kikuro Fukushima; Junko Fukushima; Tateo Warabi
Journal:  Front Neurol       Date:  2011-12-14       Impact factor: 4.003

10.  Altered resting-state functional connectivity in patients with chronic bilateral vestibular failure.

Authors:  Martin Göttlich; Nico M Jandl; Jann F Wojak; Andreas Sprenger; Janina von der Gablentz; Thomas F Münte; Ulrike M Krämer; Christoph Helmchen
Journal:  Neuroimage Clin       Date:  2014-03-12       Impact factor: 4.881

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.