Literature DB >> 16782811

Microstimulation of the somatosensory cortex can substitute for vibrissa stimulation during Pavlovian conditioning.

Rocio Leal-Campanario1, José María Delgado-García, Agnès Gruart.   

Abstract

The primary somatosensory cortex (S1) contains a map representation of the body surface. We hypothesized that S1 stimulation can successfully substitute for (or be substituted by) direct stimulation of skin receptors. We prepared rabbits for evoking eyelid conditioned responses (CRs) using a trace "shock-air puff" paradigm. In a first series of experiments, animals received a conditioned stimulus (CS, a train of electrical pulses) in the whisker pad or in the S1 areas for vibrissae or for the hind limb. In the three cases, the CS was followed 250 ms from its end by an air puff presented to the cornea as an unconditioned stimulus (US). Learning curves from the three groups presented similar values, although animals stimulated with a central CS acquired their CRs faster. In a second series of experiments, animals were divided into four groups and were presented either centrally or peripherally with the same CS for six conditioning sessions. Then, the CS was switched from central to peripheral, or vice versa, for 5 additional days. Conditioned animals were not able to discriminate between peripheral (vibrissae) stimuli and stimuli presented to the corresponding S1 (vibrissae) area, but they were able to discriminate between CSs presented to S1 (hind limb) and body (vibrissae) regions. The kinetic properties of evoked CRs were not modified by CS switching. It is proposed that S1 allows the construction of somatosensory percepts of the body surface but does not allow distinguishing the central or peripheral location of the evoking stimuli.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16782811      PMCID: PMC1479767          DOI: 10.1073/pnas.0603584103

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A        ISSN: 0027-8424            Impact factor:   11.205


  28 in total

Review 1.  Touch and go: decision-making mechanisms in somatosensation.

Authors:  R Romo; E Salinas
Journal:  Annu Rev Neurosci       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 12.449

2.  Cortical involvement in acquisition and extinction of trace eyeblink conditioning.

Authors:  A P Weible; M D McEchron; J F Disterhoft
Journal:  Behav Neurosci       Date:  2000-12       Impact factor: 1.912

3.  Involvement of cerebral cortical structures in the classical conditioning of eyelid responses in rabbits.

Authors:  A Gruart; S Morcuende; S Martínez; J M Delgado-García
Journal:  Neuroscience       Date:  2000       Impact factor: 3.590

Review 4.  The role of interpositus nucleus in eyelid conditioned responses.

Authors:  J M Delgado-García; A Gruart
Journal:  Cerebellum       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 3.847

5.  Eyeblink conditioning in the rabbit (Oryctolagus cuniculus) with stimulation of the mystacial vibrissae as a conditioned stimulus.

Authors:  S Das; C Weiss; J F Disterhoft
Journal:  Behav Neurosci       Date:  2001-06       Impact factor: 1.912

6.  Activity in the rabbit somatosensory cortex reflects the active procedural memory trace of a classically conditioned eyeblink response.

Authors:  Jan Wikgren; Timo Ruusuvirta; Tapani Korhonen
Journal:  Neurosci Lett       Date:  2003-05-01       Impact factor: 3.046

7.  CS-US interval and US intensity in classical conditioning of the rabbit's nictitating membrane response.

Authors:  M C Smith
Journal:  J Comp Physiol Psychol       Date:  1968-12

8.  Kinetic and frequency-domain properties of reflex and conditioned eyelid responses in the rabbit.

Authors:  A Gruart; B G Schreurs; E D del Toro; J M Delgado-García
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2000-02       Impact factor: 2.714

9.  Localization of tactile stimuli depends on conscious detection.

Authors:  Justin A Harris; Lisa Karlov; Colin W G Clifford
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2006-01-18       Impact factor: 6.167

10.  Tactile sensory substitution studies.

Authors:  Paul Bach-y-Rita
Journal:  Ann N Y Acad Sci       Date:  2004-05       Impact factor: 5.691

View more
  15 in total

1.  A trigeminal conditioned stimulus yields fast acquisition of cerebellum-dependent conditioned eyeblinks.

Authors:  Andrew J Carrel; Svitlana Zbarska; Gary D Zenitsky; Vlastislav Bracha
Journal:  Behav Brain Res       Date:  2011-09-12       Impact factor: 3.332

2.  Transcranial direct-current stimulation modulates synaptic mechanisms involved in associative learning in behaving rabbits.

Authors:  Javier Márquez-Ruiz; Rocío Leal-Campanario; Raudel Sánchez-Campusano; Behnam Molaee-Ardekani; Fabrice Wendling; Pedro C Miranda; Giulio Ruffini; Agnès Gruart; José María Delgado-García
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2012-04-09       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Forebrain-Cerebellar Interactions During Learning.

Authors:  Craig Weiss; Aldis P Weible; Roberto Galvez; John F Disterhoft
Journal:  Cellscience       Date:  2006-10-27

4.  Cortical barrel lesions impair whisker-CS trace eyeblink conditioning.

Authors:  Roberto Galvez; Aldis P Weible; John F Disterhoft
Journal:  Learn Mem       Date:  2007 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 2.460

5.  Classical eyeblink conditioning using electrical stimulation of caudal mPFC as conditioned stimulus is dependent on cerebellar interpositus nucleus in guinea pigs.

Authors:  Guang-yan Wu; Juan Yao; Zheng-li Fan; Lang-qian Zhang; Xuan Li; Chuang-dong Zhao; Zhen-hua Zhou; Jian-feng Sui
Journal:  Acta Pharmacol Sin       Date:  2012-05-07       Impact factor: 6.150

6.  Making time count: functional evidence for temporal coding of taste sensation.

Authors:  Patricia M Di Lorenzo; Sergey Leshchinskiy; Dana N Moroney; Jasen M Ozdoba
Journal:  Behav Neurosci       Date:  2009-02       Impact factor: 1.912

7.  Depth-dependent detection of microampere currents delivered to monkey V1.

Authors:  Edward J Tehovnik; Warren M Slocum
Journal:  Eur J Neurosci       Date:  2009-03-23       Impact factor: 3.386

8.  Anatomical pathways involved in generating and sensing rhythmic whisker movements.

Authors:  Laurens W J Bosman; Arthur R Houweling; Cullen B Owens; Nouk Tanke; Olesya T Shevchouk; Negah Rahmati; Wouter H T Teunissen; Chiheng Ju; Wei Gong; Sebastiaan K E Koekkoek; Chris I De Zeeuw
Journal:  Front Integr Neurosci       Date:  2011-10-04

9.  Sparse optical microstimulation in barrel cortex drives learned behaviour in freely moving mice.

Authors:  Daniel Huber; Leopoldo Petreanu; Nima Ghitani; Sachin Ranade; Tomás Hromádka; Zach Mainen; Karel Svoboda
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2008-01-03       Impact factor: 49.962

10.  Cortical plasticity induced by spike-triggered microstimulation in primate somatosensory cortex.

Authors:  Weiguo Song; Cliff C Kerr; William W Lytton; Joseph T Francis
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-03-05       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.