Literature DB >> 14569429

Neck muscle vibration alters visually perceived roll in normals.

George J McKenna1, Grace C Y Peng, David S Zee.   

Abstract

The objective of this study was to determine whether vibration of dorsal neck muscles or of the mastoid bone or of both modified the perception of visual orientation in the head roll-tilt plane in normal subjects. Measurements of the subjective visual vertical (SVV) were obtained from 26 normal human subjects. Subjects reported the SVV in the upright and in the left and right 30 degrees static head roll-tilt positions. Subjects then reported the SVV while vibration was applied to the left or right dorsal neck or left or right mastoid. Both head position and vibration independently modified settings of the SVV. In head-tilted positions, vibration of the upper dorsal neck muscles (on the side of the head opposite to the head tilt) caused a significantly greater shift of the SVV in the opposite direction of head roll-tilt compared to vibration of the lower dorsal neck muscles or of the mastoid. These results support a role for cervical somatosensory information in perception of visual orientation in the roll plane. Our findings may help explain the differences observed in visual orientation perception in normal subjects between head alone and whole-body roll-tilt. Finally, vibration of neck muscles in the head roll-tilted plane may be a useful method to test cervical somatosensory function possibly by increasing their response to external stimulation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 14569429      PMCID: PMC2538369          DOI: 10.1007/s10162-003-4005-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol        ISSN: 1438-7573


  31 in total

1.  Neck muscle vibration alters visually-perceived roll after unilateral vestibular loss.

Authors:  G A Betts; M Barone; M Karlberg; H MacDougall; I S Curthoys
Journal:  Neuroreport       Date:  2000-08-21       Impact factor: 1.837

2.  Studies in space orientation; perception of the upright in the absence of a visual field.

Authors:  H A WITKIN; S E ASCH
Journal:  J Exp Psychol       Date:  1948-10

3.  The responses of human muscle spindle endings to vibration of non-contracting muscles.

Authors:  D Burke; K E Hagbarth; L Löfstedt; B G Wallin
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1976-10       Impact factor: 5.182

4.  Responses of squirrel monkey vestibular neurons to audio-frequency sound and head vibration.

Authors:  E D Young; C Fernández; J M Goldberg
Journal:  Acta Otolaryngol       Date:  1977 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 1.494

5.  Elicitation of vestibular side effects by regional vibration of the head.

Authors:  J R Lackner; A Graybiel
Journal:  Aerosp Med       Date:  1974-11

6.  Optokinetic-graviceptive interaction in different head positions.

Authors:  J Dichgans; H C Diener; T Brandt
Journal:  Acta Otolaryngol       Date:  1974 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 1.494

7.  The contribution of muscle afferents to kinaesthesia shown by vibration induced illusions of movement and by the effects of paralysing joint afferents.

Authors:  G M Goodwin; D I McCloskey; P B Matthews
Journal:  Brain       Date:  1972       Impact factor: 13.501

8.  The judgement of the visual vertical and horizontal with peripheral and central vestibular lesions.

Authors:  G Friedmann
Journal:  Brain       Date:  1970       Impact factor: 13.501

9.  Binocular counterrolling in humans during dynamic rotation.

Authors:  S G Diamond; C H Markham; N E Simpson; I S Curthoys
Journal:  Acta Otolaryngol       Date:  1979 May-Jun       Impact factor: 1.494

10.  Vibration-induced ocular torsion and nystagmus after unilateral vestibular deafferentation.

Authors:  Mikael Karlberg; Swee T Aw; Ross A Black; Michael J Todd; Hamish G MacDougall; G Michael Halmagyi
Journal:  Brain       Date:  2003-04       Impact factor: 13.501

View more
  8 in total

1.  Effects of neck muscle vibration on subjective visual vertical: comparative analysis with effects on nystagmus.

Authors:  Tetsuaki Kawase; Atsuko Maki; Yusuke Takata; Hiromitsu Miyazaki; Toshimitsu Kobayashi
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2010-12-23       Impact factor: 2.503

2.  Cervicocephalic relocation test to evaluate cervical proprioception in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis.

Authors:  Marc-Alexandre Guyot; Olivier Agnani; Laurent Peyrodie; Demaille Samantha; Cécile Donze; Jean-Francois Catanzariti
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2016-04-12       Impact factor: 3.134

3.  Influence of extero- and proprioceptive afferents of the plantar surface in determining subjective visual vertical in patients with unilateral vestibular dysfunction.

Authors:  M Faralli; F Longari; G Ricci; M C Ibba; A Frenguelli
Journal:  Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital       Date:  2009-10       Impact factor: 2.124

4.  Reflex control of the spine and posture: a review of the literature from a chiropractic perspective.

Authors:  Mark W Morningstar; Burl R Pettibon; Heidi Schlappi; Mark Schlappi; Trevor V Ireland
Journal:  Chiropr Osteopat       Date:  2005-08-09

5.  The Subjective Visual Vertical and the Subjective Haptic Vertical Access Different Gravity Estimates.

Authors:  Lindsey E Fraser; Bobbak Makooie; Laurence R Harris
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-12-30       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 6.  Perception of Upright: Multisensory Convergence and the Role of Temporo-Parietal Cortex.

Authors:  Amir Kheradmand; Ariel Winnick
Journal:  Front Neurol       Date:  2017-10-25       Impact factor: 4.003

7.  Plantar cutaneous afferents influence the perception of Subjective Visual Vertical in quiet stance.

Authors:  A Foisy; Z Kapoula
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-10-08       Impact factor: 4.379

8.  Multisensory contribution in visuospatial orientation: an interaction between neck and trunk proprioception.

Authors:  Jason McCarthy; Patricia Castro; Rachael Cottier; Joseph Buttell; Qadeer Arshad; Amir Kheradmand; Diego Kaski
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2021-06-13       Impact factor: 1.972

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.