Literature DB >> 17484007

Ergonomics with the use of curved versus straight laparoscopic graspers during rectosigmoid resection: results of a multiprofile comparative study.

G A Manukyan1, M Waseda, N Inaki, J R Torres Bermudez, I A Gacek, A Rudinski, G F Buess.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: A detailed ergonomic comparison of motions and muscular activity in the left upper extremity using a laparoscopic straight or curved grasper in rectosigmoid resection is presented.
METHODS: The study had two parts: experimental and clinical. In the experiment part, 30 laparoscopic sigmoid resections were performed under animal organ phantom conditions. The operations were divided into three groups according to instrument and trocar position. Group 1 (n = 10) underwent operations performed with a curved grasper in the excentral trocar position (in relation to the telescope trocar), with the left-hand curved grasper placed in the right flank and the right hand instrument in the right lower quadrant. In group 2 (n = 10), straight forceps were used in the excentral trocar position. Group 3 (n = 10) underwent laparoscopic sigmoid resection performed with a straight grasper in the central position (in relation to the telescope trocar), with the instruments placed at both sides of the lower abdomen. To measure ergonomic aspects during rectosigmoid resection, several overview video cameras, surface electromyography (EMG), an ultrasound tracking system (UTS), and a questionnaire were used. In the clinical part of the study, laparoscopic rectosigmoid resections (n = 5) were performed using a curved instrument in the excentral trocar position. The surgeon's left-hand movement and body posture were recorded for further analysis.
RESULTS: The curved grasper required the fewest contractions (group 1) of the measured muscles. A comparison of the UTS analysis in the experimental part of the study and the video analysis in the clinical part showed economy of movements in group 1. According to subjective estimation, both physical activity and mental stress remain at the lowest level when the excentral trocar position is used (groups 1 and 2).
CONCLUSIONS: The combination of the curved grasper and the excentral trocar position (in relation to the telescope trocar) is, according to our examinations, the best ergonomic adjustment for laparoscopic rectosigmoid surgery.

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17484007     DOI: 10.1007/s00464-007-9284-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Surg Endosc        ISSN: 0930-2794            Impact factor:   4.584


  20 in total

1.  Ergonomic problems associated with laparoscopic surgery.

Authors:  R Berguer; D L Forkey; W D Smith
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  1999-05       Impact factor: 4.584

2.  Laparoscopic elective treatment of diverticular disease. A comparison between laparoscopic-assisted and resection-facilitated techniques.

Authors:  Q A Eijsbouts; J de Haan; F Berends; C Sietses; M A Cuesta
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2000-08       Impact factor: 4.584

3.  Assessment of ergonomics in laparoscopic surgery.

Authors: 
Journal:  Minim Invasive Ther Allied Technol       Date:  2001-05       Impact factor: 2.442

4.  Monitor position in laparoscopic surgery.

Authors:  U Matern; M Faist; K Kehl; C Giebmeyer; G Buess
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2005-01-10       Impact factor: 4.584

5.  Surgical technology and the ergonomics of laparoscopic instruments.

Authors:  R Berguer
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  1998-05       Impact factor: 4.584

6.  Quantitative electromyographic evaluation of muscular load during work.

Authors:  B Jonsson
Journal:  Scand J Rehabil Med Suppl       Date:  1978

Review 7.  National Institutes of Health Consensus Development Conference Statement on Gallstones and Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy.

Authors: 
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  1993-04       Impact factor: 2.565

8.  Laparoscopic vs open colectomy for sigmoid diverticulitis: a prospective comparative study in the elderly.

Authors:  J J Tuech; P Pessaux; C Rouge; N Regenet; R Bergamaschi; J P Arnaud
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2000-11       Impact factor: 4.584

9.  Laparoscopic colectomy for sigmoid diverticulitis in obese and nonobese patients: a prospective comparative study.

Authors:  J J Tuech; N Regenet; S Hennekinne; P Pessaux; R Bergamaschi; J P Arnaud
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 4.584

10.  Laparoscopic approach to treatment of sigmoid diverticulitis: changes in the spectrum of indications and results of a prospective, multicenter study on 1,545 patients.

Authors:  Hubert Scheidbach; Claus Schneider; Jörg Rose; Jochen Konradt; Eberhard Gross; Eckhard Bärlehner; Matthias Pross; Uwe Schmidt; Ferdinand Köckerling; Hans Lippert
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  2004-11       Impact factor: 4.585

View more
  3 in total

1.  Motion Measurement and Analysis of Different Instruments for Single-Incision Laparoscopic Surgery.

Authors:  Kunyong Lyu; Lixiao Yang; Chengli Song
Journal:  Appl Bionics Biomech       Date:  2022-06-01       Impact factor: 1.664

2.  Vacuum grasping as a manipulation technique for minimally invasive surgery.

Authors:  D Vonck; R H M Goossens; D J van Eijk; I H J T de Hingh; J J Jakimowicz
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2010-03-02       Impact factor: 4.584

3.  Minimally invasive single-site surgery for the digestive system: A technological review.

Authors:  Parag W Dhumane; Michele Diana; Joel Leroy; Jacques Marescaux
Journal:  J Minim Access Surg       Date:  2011-01       Impact factor: 1.407

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.