AIMS: It is not known whether the apparent normality of echocardiographic examination results, in subjects bearing a mutation for hypertrophic cardiomyopathy but without ultrasonic left ventricular hypertrophy, is due to incomplete phenotypic expression, or inaccurate echocardiographic criteria. The aim of this study was to search for echocardiographic abnormalities in these patients. METHODS AND RESULTS: Echocardiography was performed in 100 subjects from two families with a mutation in the beta-MHC (720) or My-BPC (714) genes. We compared genetically affected subjects with an apparently normal left ventricle (thickness < 13 mm) (20 patients), and nonaffected first-degree relatives (61 normal subjects). (1) Patients had a thicker left ventricular wall (9.7 +/- 1.4 vs 8.9 +/- 1.4 mm, P = 0.03), a greater indexed mass (107 +/- 18 vs 97 +/- 17 g. m-2, P = 0.03), a larger left atrium (27 +/- 9 vs 23 +/- 10 mm3, P = 0.09) and lower wall stress (78 +/- 11 vs 89 +/- 15 10(3) dynes. cm-2, P = 0.002); these differences were highly significant after adjustment for height, age and systolic blood pressure either for wall thickness (P = 0.000003), mass (P = 0.005) or atrial volume (P = 0.001), and the ventricular systolic dimension appeared smaller (P = 0.01); (2) results remained significant (P < 0.01) when a lower cut-off value (< or = 11 mm) or only adults (> or = 18 years) were considered; (3) a subanalysis of Family 714 (13 patients, 25 normals matched for sex, age and height) showed the same trends. CONCLUSION: In familial hypertrophic cardiomyopathy, genetically affected subjects with an apparently normal heart by echocardiography show slight ultrasonic structural and functional left ventricular modifications, suggesting that the phenotype of the disease is a continuous spectrum from normal structure to typical hypertrophy.
AIMS: It is not known whether the apparent normality of echocardiographic examination results, in subjects bearing a mutation for hypertrophic cardiomyopathy but without ultrasonic left ventricular hypertrophy, is due to incomplete phenotypic expression, or inaccurate echocardiographic criteria. The aim of this study was to search for echocardiographic abnormalities in these patients. METHODS AND RESULTS: Echocardiography was performed in 100 subjects from two families with a mutation in the beta-MHC (720) or My-BPC (714) genes. We compared genetically affected subjects with an apparently normal left ventricle (thickness < 13 mm) (20 patients), and nonaffected first-degree relatives (61 normal subjects). (1) Patients had a thicker left ventricular wall (9.7 +/- 1.4 vs 8.9 +/- 1.4 mm, P = 0.03), a greater indexed mass (107 +/- 18 vs 97 +/- 17 g. m-2, P = 0.03), a larger left atrium (27 +/- 9 vs 23 +/- 10 mm3, P = 0.09) and lower wall stress (78 +/- 11 vs 89 +/- 15 10(3) dynes. cm-2, P = 0.002); these differences were highly significant after adjustment for height, age and systolic blood pressure either for wall thickness (P = 0.000003), mass (P = 0.005) or atrial volume (P = 0.001), and the ventricular systolic dimension appeared smaller (P = 0.01); (2) results remained significant (P < 0.01) when a lower cut-off value (< or = 11 mm) or only adults (> or = 18 years) were considered; (3) a subanalysis of Family 714 (13 patients, 25 normals matched for sex, age and height) showed the same trends. CONCLUSION: In familial hypertrophic cardiomyopathy, genetically affected subjects with an apparently normal heart by echocardiography show slight ultrasonic structural and functional left ventricular modifications, suggesting that the phenotype of the disease is a continuous spectrum from normal structure to typical hypertrophy.
Authors: Robert A Levine; Albert A Hagége; Daniel P Judge; Muralidhar Padala; Jacob P Dal-Bianco; Elena Aikawa; Jonathan Beaudoin; Joyce Bischoff; Nabila Bouatia-Naji; Patrick Bruneval; Jonathan T Butcher; Alain Carpentier; Miguel Chaput; Adrian H Chester; Catherine Clusel; Francesca N Delling; Harry C Dietz; Christian Dina; Ronen Durst; Leticia Fernandez-Friera; Mark D Handschumacher; Morten O Jensen; Xavier P Jeunemaitre; Hervé Le Marec; Thierry Le Tourneau; Roger R Markwald; Jean Mérot; Emmanuel Messas; David P Milan; Tui Neri; Russell A Norris; David Peal; Maelle Perrocheau; Vincent Probst; Michael Pucéat; Nadia Rosenthal; Jorge Solis; Jean-Jacques Schott; Ehud Schwammenthal; Susan A Slaugenhaupt; Jae-Kwan Song; Magdi H Yacoub Journal: Nat Rev Cardiol Date: 2015-10-20 Impact factor: 32.419
Authors: John D Groarke; Patrycja Z Galazka; Allison L Cirino; Neal K Lakdawala; Jens J Thune; Henning Bundgaard; E John Orav; Robert A Levine; Carolyn Y Ho Journal: Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging Date: 2018-10-01 Impact factor: 6.875
Authors: Carolyn Y Ho; Sharlene M Day; Steven D Colan; Mark W Russell; Jeffrey A Towbin; Mark V Sherrid; Charles E Canter; John L Jefferies; Anne M Murphy; Allison L Cirino; Theodore P Abraham; Matthew Taylor; Luisa Mestroni; David A Bluemke; Petr Jarolim; Ling Shi; Lynn A Sleeper; Christine E Seidman; E John Orav Journal: JAMA Cardiol Date: 2017-04-01 Impact factor: 14.676
Authors: Albert A Hagège; Patrick Bruneval; Robert A Levine; Michel Desnos; Hany Neamatalla; Daniel P Judge Journal: J Cardiovasc Transl Res Date: 2011-09-10 Impact factor: 4.132
Authors: Anne Marie Valente; Neal K Lakdawala; Andrew J Powell; Sarah P Evans; Allison L Cirino; E John Orav; Calum A MacRae; Steven D Colan; Carolyn Y Ho Journal: Circ Cardiovasc Genet Date: 2013-05-20
Authors: Lenises de Paula van der Steld; Oscar Campuzano; Alexandra Pérez-Serra; Mabel Moura de Barros Zamorano; Selma Sousa Matos; Ramon Brugada Journal: Am J Case Rep Date: 2017-07-10
Authors: Daniel P Judge; Hany Neamatalla; Russell A Norris; Robert A Levine; Jonathan T Butcher; Nicolas Vignier; Kevin H Kang; Quangtung Nguyen; Patrick Bruneval; Marie-Cécile Perier; Emmanuel Messas; Xavier Jeunemaitre; Annemarieke de Vlaming; Roger Markwald; Lucie Carrier; Albert A Hagège Journal: J Cardiovasc Dev Dis Date: 2015-04-21