Carolyn Y Ho1, Sharlene M Day2, Steven D Colan3, Mark W Russell4, Jeffrey A Towbin5, Mark V Sherrid6, Charles E Canter7, John L Jefferies5, Anne M Murphy8, Allison L Cirino1, Theodore P Abraham9, Matthew Taylor10, Luisa Mestroni10, David A Bluemke11, Petr Jarolim12, Ling Shi13, Lynn A Sleeper14, Christine E Seidman15, E John Orav16. 1. Cardiovascular Division, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts. 2. Department of Internal Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor. 3. Department of Cardiology, Boston Children's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts. 4. Department of Pediatrics, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor. 5. The Heart Institute, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, Ohio. 6. Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, New York University Langone Medical Center, New York, New York. 7. Department of Pediatrics, Washington University School of Medicine in St Louis, Missouri. 8. Division of Pediatric Cardiology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland. 9. Division of Cardiology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland. 10. University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora. 11. Radiology and Imaging Sciences, Clinical Center, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland. 12. Department of Pathology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts. 13. New England Research Institutes, Watertown, Massachusetts. 14. Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Chevy Chase, Maryland. 15. Cardiovascular Division, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts14Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Chevy Chase, Maryland. 16. Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts.
Abstract
Importance: Sarcomere mutations and left ventricular (LV) hypertrophy (LVH) are cardinal features of hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM). However, little is known about the full spectrum of phenotypic manifestations or how LVH influences disease expression. Objectives: (1) To characterize and assess phenotypic burden in sarcomere mutation carriers (genotype positive [G+]) and (2) to investigate the correlation between LV wall thickness (LVWT) and other disease features in mutation carriers. Design, Setting, and Participants: This investigation was a cross-sectional, multicenter observational study in the setting of the HCMNet network of HCM clinical centers. Mutation carriers with LVH (G+/LVH+), mutation carriers without LVH (G+/LVH-), and healthy related control individuals (G-/LVH-) were enrolled through HCMNet sites. A total of 193 participants were enrolled and underwent study procedures. Participants were enrolled between April 9, 2010, and January 30, 2012. Study analysis was performed between June 2015 and May 2016. Exposures: The primary stratifying variables were the presence of a sarcomere mutation and measures of LVWT. Main Outcomes and Measures: Variables from standardized exercise testing, echocardiography, cardiac magnetic resonance imaging, serum biomarker measurement, and electrocardiography were compared across study cohorts. Results: Analyses were performed in 178 participants, including 81 G+/LVH+ (mean [SD] age at baseline, 27 [14] years), 55 G+/LVH- (20 [10] years), and 42 G-/LVH- (18 [8] years). All mutation carriers had smaller LV cavity, higher ratio of LVWT to diastolic diameter, and higher echocardiographic LV ejection fraction than controls. A phenotypic burden score was evaluated as the cumulative number of 7 traits (changes on electrocardiography; decreased LV systolic, diastolic diameter, or septal E' velocity; higher ratio of LVWT to diastolic diameter; serum troponin level; and natriuretic peptide level) in each individual. The mean (SE) phenotypic burden was 4.9 (0.2) phenotypes per individual in G+/LVH+, 2.4 (0.2) in G+/LVH-, and 1.3 (0.2) in controls (P < .001). Classification and regression tree analysis identified an LV end-diastolic dimension z score less than -1.85 or the combination of an LV end-diastolic dimension z score of -1.85 or higher and a septal E' velocity z score less than -0.52 as having 74% accuracy in discriminating G+/LVH- participants from controls. In mutation carriers, clinical variables demonstrated a continuous correlation with LVWT, generally without a clear cutoff signifying pathologic transition. Conclusions and Relevance: G+/LVH- individuals demonstrated altered cardiac dimensions and function and a higher burden of early phenotypes than healthy G- controls. Two methods discriminated phenotypic subgroups, namely, a sum across 7 traits and a regression tree-based rule that identifies constellations of distinguishing factors. Greater LVWT is associated with more prominent cardiac abnormalities in a continuous, although not always linear, manner. A single value of LVWT could not dichotomize the presence or absence of disease.
Importance: Sarcomere mutations and left ventricular (LV) hypertrophy (LVH) are cardinal features of hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM). However, little is known about the full spectrum of phenotypic manifestations or how LVH influences disease expression. Objectives: (1) To characterize and assess phenotypic burden in sarcomere mutation carriers (genotype positive [G+]) and (2) to investigate the correlation between LV wall thickness (LVWT) and other disease features in mutation carriers. Design, Setting, and Participants: This investigation was a cross-sectional, multicenter observational study in the setting of the HCMNet network of HCM clinical centers. Mutation carriers with LVH (G+/LVH+), mutation carriers without LVH (G+/LVH-), and healthy related control individuals (G-/LVH-) were enrolled through HCMNet sites. A total of 193 participants were enrolled and underwent study procedures. Participants were enrolled between April 9, 2010, and January 30, 2012. Study analysis was performed between June 2015 and May 2016. Exposures: The primary stratifying variables were the presence of a sarcomere mutation and measures of LVWT. Main Outcomes and Measures: Variables from standardized exercise testing, echocardiography, cardiac magnetic resonance imaging, serum biomarker measurement, and electrocardiography were compared across study cohorts. Results: Analyses were performed in 178 participants, including 81 G+/LVH+ (mean [SD] age at baseline, 27 [14] years), 55 G+/LVH- (20 [10] years), and 42 G-/LVH- (18 [8] years). All mutation carriers had smaller LV cavity, higher ratio of LVWT to diastolic diameter, and higher echocardiographic LV ejection fraction than controls. A phenotypic burden score was evaluated as the cumulative number of 7 traits (changes on electrocardiography; decreased LV systolic, diastolic diameter, or septal E' velocity; higher ratio of LVWT to diastolic diameter; serum troponin level; and natriuretic peptide level) in each individual. The mean (SE) phenotypic burden was 4.9 (0.2) phenotypes per individual in G+/LVH+, 2.4 (0.2) in G+/LVH-, and 1.3 (0.2) in controls (P < .001). Classification and regression tree analysis identified an LV end-diastolic dimension z score less than -1.85 or the combination of an LV end-diastolic dimension z score of -1.85 or higher and a septal E' velocity z score less than -0.52 as having 74% accuracy in discriminating G+/LVH- participants from controls. In mutation carriers, clinical variables demonstrated a continuous correlation with LVWT, generally without a clear cutoff signifying pathologic transition. Conclusions and Relevance: G+/LVH- individuals demonstrated altered cardiac dimensions and function and a higher burden of early phenotypes than healthy G- controls. Two methods discriminated phenotypic subgroups, namely, a sum across 7 traits and a regression tree-based rule that identifies constellations of distinguishing factors. Greater LVWT is associated with more prominent cardiac abnormalities in a continuous, although not always linear, manner. A single value of LVWT could not dichotomize the presence or absence of disease.
Authors: Wessel P Brouwer; Tjeerd Germans; Maaike C Head; Jolanda van der Velden; Martijn W Heymans; Imke Christiaans; Arjan C Houweling; Arthur A Wilde; Albert C van Rossum Journal: Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging Date: 2012-01-24 Impact factor: 6.875
Authors: H Niimura; L L Bachinski; S Sangwatanaroj; H Watkins; A E Chudley; W McKenna; A Kristinsson; R Roberts; M Sole; B J Maron; J G Seidman; C E Seidman Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 1998-04-30 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: N B Schiller; P M Shah; M Crawford; A DeMaria; R Devereux; H Feigenbaum; H Gutgesell; N Reichek; D Sahn; I Schnittger Journal: J Am Soc Echocardiogr Date: 1989 Sep-Oct Impact factor: 5.251
Authors: Carolyn Y Ho; Siddique A Abbasi; Tomas G Neilan; Ravi V Shah; Yucheng Chen; Bobak Heydari; Allison L Cirino; Neal K Lakdawala; E John Orav; Arantxa González; Begoña López; Javier Díez; Michael Jerosch-Herold; Raymond Y Kwong Journal: Circ Cardiovasc Imaging Date: 2013-04-02 Impact factor: 7.792
Authors: Nuno Cardim; Andreas Perrot; Teresa Ferreira; Amadeu Pereira; Karl Joseph Osterziel; Roberto Palma Reis; João Francisco Martins Correia Journal: Am J Cardiol Date: 2002-07-15 Impact factor: 2.778
Authors: Morten K Jensen; Ole Havndrup; Michael Christiansen; Paal S Andersen; Anna Axelsson; Lars Køber; Henning Bundgaard Journal: Int J Cardiovasc Imaging Date: 2015-08-01 Impact factor: 2.357
Authors: Jenifer G Crilley; Ernest A Boehm; Edward Blair; Bheeshma Rajagopalan; Andrew M Blamire; Peter Styles; William J McKenna; Ingegerd Ostman-Smith; Kieran Clarke; Hugh Watkins Journal: J Am Coll Cardiol Date: 2003-05-21 Impact factor: 24.094
Authors: Jeanette Schulz-Menger; David A Bluemke; Jens Bremerich; Scott D Flamm; Mark A Fogel; Matthias G Friedrich; Raymond J Kim; Florian von Knobelsdorff-Brenkenhoff; Christopher M Kramer; Dudley J Pennell; Sven Plein; Eike Nagel Journal: J Cardiovasc Magn Reson Date: 2013-05-01 Impact factor: 5.364
Authors: Christopher M Kramer; Jörg Barkhausen; Scott D Flamm; Raymond J Kim; Eike Nagel Journal: J Cardiovasc Magn Reson Date: 2013-10-08 Impact factor: 5.364
Authors: Anna Axelsson Raja; Hoshang Farhad; Anne Marie Valente; John-Paul Couce; John Lynn Jefferies; Henning Bundgaard; Kenneth Zahka; Harry Lever; Anne M Murphy; Euan Ashley; Sharlene M Day; Mark V Sherrid; Ling Shi; David A Bluemke; Charles E Canter; Steven D Colan; Carolyn Y Ho Journal: Circulation Date: 2018-08-21 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: John D Groarke; Patrycja Z Galazka; Allison L Cirino; Neal K Lakdawala; Jens J Thune; Henning Bundgaard; E John Orav; Robert A Levine; Carolyn Y Ho Journal: Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging Date: 2018-10-01 Impact factor: 6.875
Authors: Teresa M Lee; Daphne T Hsu; Paul Kantor; Jeffrey A Towbin; Stephanie M Ware; Steven D Colan; Wendy K Chung; John L Jefferies; Joseph W Rossano; Chesney D Castleberry; Linda J Addonizio; Ashwin K Lal; Jacqueline M Lamour; Erin M Miller; Philip T Thrush; Jason D Czachor; Hiedy Razoky; Ashley Hill; Steven E Lipshultz Journal: Circ Res Date: 2017-09-15 Impact factor: 17.367
Authors: Shiv Kumar Viswanathan; Megan J Puckelwartz; Ashish Mehta; Chrishan J A Ramachandra; Aravindakshan Jagadeesan; Regina Fritsche-Danielson; Ratan V Bhat; Philip Wong; Sangeetha Kandoi; Jennifer A Schwanekamp; Gina Kuffel; Lorenzo L Pesce; Michael J Zilliox; U Nalla B Durai; Rama Shanker Verma; Robert E Molokie; Domodhar P Suresh; Philip R Khoury; Annie Thomas; Thriveni Sanagala; Hak Chiaw Tang; Richard C Becker; Ralph Knöll; Winston Shim; Elizabeth M McNally; Sakthivel Sadayappan Journal: JAMA Cardiol Date: 2018-06-01 Impact factor: 14.676