Literature DB >> 9566340

Low-frequency amphibious hearing in pinnipeds: methods, measurements, noise, and ecology.

D Kastak1, R J Schusterman.   

Abstract

Aerial low-frequency (100-6400 Hz) hearing thresholds were obtained for one California sea lion (Zalophus californianus), one harbor seal (Phoca vitulina), and one northern elephant seal (Mirounga angustirostris). Underwater thresholds over a similar frequency range (75-6300 or 6400 Hz) were obtained for these three animals in addition to another California sea lion. Such data are critical, not only for understanding mechanisms about amphibious hearing and relating them to pinniped ecology and evolution, but also for identifying species at risk to man-made noise in the marine environment. Under water, the elephant seal was most sensitive, followed by the harbor seal and the sea lions. In air, the harbor seal was most sensitive, followed by the older of the two sea lions and the elephant seal. The following trends emerged from comparisons of each subject's aerial and underwater thresholds: (a) the sea lion (although possessing some aquatic modifications) is adapted to hear best in air; (b) the harbor seal hears almost equally well in air and under water; and (c) the elephant seal's auditory system is adapted for underwater functioning at the expense of aerial hearing sensitivity. These differences became evident only when aerial and underwater thresholds were compared with respect to sound pressure rather than intensity. When such biologically relevant comparisons are made, differences in auditory sensitivity can be shown to relate directly to ecology and life history.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9566340     DOI: 10.1121/1.421367

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  15 in total

1.  The influence of cochlear shape on low-frequency hearing.

Authors:  Daphne Manoussaki; Richard S Chadwick; Darlene R Ketten; Julie Arruda; Emilios K Dimitriadis; Jen T O'Malley
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2008-04-14       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Anatomical evidence for low frequency sensitivity in an archaeocete whale: comparison of the inner ear of Zygorhiza kochii with that of crown Mysticeti.

Authors:  Eric G Ekdale; Rachel A Racicot
Journal:  J Anat       Date:  2014-11-14       Impact factor: 2.610

3.  Sensory biology of aquatic mammals.

Authors:  Wolf Hanke; Guido Dehnhardt
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2013-05-05       Impact factor: 1.836

4.  Early evolution of the ossicular chain in Cetacea: into the middle ear gears of a semi-aquatic protocetid whale.

Authors:  Mickaël J Mourlam; Maeva J Orliac
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2019-10-02       Impact factor: 5.349

5.  Great cormorants (Phalacrocorax carbo) can detect auditory cues while diving.

Authors:  Kirstin Anderson Hansen; Alyssa Maxwell; Ursula Siebert; Ole Næsbye Larsen; Magnus Wahlberg
Journal:  Naturwissenschaften       Date:  2017-05-05

6.  Amphibious auditory evoked potentials in four North American Testudines genera spanning the aquatic-terrestrial spectrum.

Authors:  Jeffrey N Zeyl; Carol E Johnston
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2015-07-21       Impact factor: 1.836

7.  The better to eat you with: the comparative feeding morphology of phocid seals (Pinnipedia, Phocidae).

Authors:  Sarah S Kienle; Annalisa Berta
Journal:  J Anat       Date:  2015-12-09       Impact factor: 2.610

8.  Comparative assessment of amphibious hearing in pinnipeds.

Authors:  Colleen Reichmuth; Marla M Holt; Jason Mulsow; Jillian M Sills; Brandon L Southall
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2013-04-06       Impact factor: 1.836

9.  Repeated elicitation of the acoustic startle reflex leads to sensitisation in subsequent avoidance behaviour and induces fear conditioning.

Authors:  Thomas Götz; Vincent M Janik
Journal:  BMC Neurosci       Date:  2011-04-13       Impact factor: 3.288

10.  Foraging in the darkness of the Southern Ocean: influence of bioluminescence on a deep diving predator.

Authors:  Jade Vacquié-Garcia; François Royer; Anne-Cécile Dragon; Morgane Viviant; Frédéric Bailleul; Christophe Guinet
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-08-29       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.