Literature DB >> 9566330

Effects of sensorineural hearing loss on interaural discrimination and virtual localization.

L Smith-Olinde1, J Koehnke, J Besing.   

Abstract

Cross-frequency binaural processing was investigated in listeners with normal hearing (NH) and with bilateral high-frequency sensorineural hearing impairment (IH). In experiment 1 just-noticeable-differences for interaural time and interaural intensity were measured using 1/3-octave narrow-band noises (NBNs) centered at 0.5 and 4 kHz. These stimuli were presented in isolation and in different cross-frequency interaural combinations. IH listeners displayed the best interaural time discrimination when the 0.5-kHz NBN was dichotic and the best intensity discrimination when both bands were dichotic. Both NH listeners (time) and IH listeners (time and intensity) displayed the poorest interaural discrimination when the NBNs were presented simultaneously with interaural differences in only the 4-kHz NBN (0.5 kHz NBN dichotic). Localization accuracy was measured in experiment 2 using the 0.5- and 4-kHz NBNs in isolation and with 0.5-kHz target/4-kHz interferer and 4-kHz target/0.5-kHz interferer conditions. Best localization of NH and IH subjects was seen for the 0.5-kHz target, with or without an interferer. Poorest localization of IH subjects was observed for the 4-kHz target and 0.5-kHz interferer. Results suggest that for these IH subjects, localization is most difficult when they are forced to rely on interaural information in a higher-frequency region with conflicting interaural information at low frequencies.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9566330     DOI: 10.1121/1.421355

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  9 in total

1.  Binaural interference in lateralization thresholds for interaural time and level differences.

Authors:  Laurie M Heller; Virginia M Richards
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2010-07       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Binaural interference in the free field.

Authors:  Naomi B H Croghan; D Wesley Grantham
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2010-05       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Spatial release from masking in normally hearing and hearing-impaired listeners as a function of the temporal overlap of competing talkers.

Authors:  Virginia Best; Christine R Mason; Gerald Kidd
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2011-03       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  Relating interaural difference sensitivities for several parameters measured in normal-hearing and hearing-impaired listeners.

Authors:  Nathaniel J Spencer; Monica L Hawley; H Steven Colburn
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2016-09       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  Auditory and visual orienting responses in listeners with and without hearing-impairment.

Authors:  W Owen Brimijoin; David McShefferty; Michael A Akeroyd
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2010-06       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  The effect of target and interferer frequency on across-frequency binaural interference of interaural-level-difference sensitivity.

Authors:  Beth Rosen; Matthew J Goupell
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2022-02       Impact factor: 1.840

7.  Spectral weighting functions for lateralization and localization of complex sound.

Authors:  Monica L Folkerts; G Christopher Stecker
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2022-05       Impact factor: 2.482

8.  Specific loss of neural sensitivity to interaural time difference of unmodulated noise stimuli following noise-induced hearing loss.

Authors:  Hariprakash Haragopal; Ryan Dorkoski; Austin R Pollard; Gareth A Whaley; Timothy R Wohl; Noelle C Stroud; Mitchell L Day
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2020-08-26       Impact factor: 2.714

9.  Age-Related Changes in Interaural-Level-Difference-Based Across-Frequency Binaural Interference.

Authors:  Matthew J Goupell
Journal:  Front Aging Neurosci       Date:  2022-07-27       Impact factor: 5.702

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.