Literature DB >> 9565114

Implications of peritoneal cytology for pancreatic cancer management.

M A Makary1, A L Warshaw, B A Centeno, C G Willet, D W Rattner, C Fernández-del Castillo.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To assess the implications of positive cytology for malignant cells (positive results) from peritoneal washings in the management of patients with pancreatic cancer.
DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study.
SETTING: Referral practice in a university hospital. PATIENTS: A total of 32 consecutive pancreatic cancer patients with positive results from peritoneal washings during a 4-year period, 17 with visible biopsy-proven intraabdominal metastases at the time of laparoscopy or laparotomy and 15 without visible metastases. A treatment-matched control group of 30 patients was randomly selected from a group of 105 patients with negative cytology for malignant cells (negative results) from peritoneal-fluid cytology.
INTERVENTIONS: Eight of 17 patients with visible metastases underwent treatment with chemotherapy, radiation, or both; 13 of the 15 patients with no visible metastases underwent further treatment, including pancreatic resection in 2 patients and external beam radiation in 13 patients (3 with intraoperative radiation therapy). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Time to metastases and mortality.
RESULTS: Median survival among patients with and without visible metastasis was 7.8 months and 8.6 months, respectively (P=.95), despite the fact that patients without visible metastases received more treatment. Patients without visible metastases at presentation were found to have metastatic disease as documented by computed tomographic scan or subsequent laparotomy at a median time of 2.9 months. The survival of treatment-matched patients with negative cytology was significantly longer (median, 13.5 months; P=.04).
CONCLUSIONS: Pancreatic cancer patients with peritoneal micrometastases have a dismal outcome even without macroscopic metastases. Since these patients do not benefit from local therapy, the finding of a positive result from peritoneal-fluid cytologic testing contraindicates further irradiation or surgery, except for specific complications.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9565114     DOI: 10.1001/archsurg.133.4.361

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Surg        ISSN: 0004-0010


  18 in total

Review 1.  Diagnostic laparoscopy: indications and benefits.

Authors:  Beate Rau; Michael Hünerbein
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2004-05-20       Impact factor: 3.445

Review 2.  [Minimal residual tumor in gastrointestinal carcinoma. Relevance to prognosis and oncologic surgical consequences].

Authors:  S Gretschel; A Bembenek; T Schulze; W Kemmner; P M Schlag
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  2006-12       Impact factor: 0.955

3.  Detection of disseminated pancreatic cells by amplification of cytokeratin-19 with quantitative RT-PCR in blood, bone marrow and peritoneal lavage of pancreatic carcinoma patients.

Authors:  Katrin Hoffmann; Christiane Kerner; Wolfgang Wilfert; Marc Mueller; Joachim Thiery; Johann Hauss; Helmut Witzigmann
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2007-01-14       Impact factor: 5.742

Review 4.  Detection and clinical implications of minimal residual disease in gastro-intestinal cancer.

Authors:  Fabian Wolfrum; Ilka Vogel; Fred Fändrich; Holger Kalthoff
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2005-07-01       Impact factor: 3.445

5.  Diagnostic laparoscopy improves staging of pancreatic cancer deemed locally unresectable by computed tomography.

Authors:  R C Liu; L W Traverso
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2005-03-23       Impact factor: 4.584

6.  The implications of positive peritoneal lavage cytology in potentially resectable pancreatic cancer.

Authors:  Ryuji Yoshioka; Akio Saiura; Rintaro Koga; Junichi Arita; Nobuyuki Takemura; Yoshihiro Ono; Junji Yamamoto; Toshiharu Yamaguchi
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2012-09       Impact factor: 3.352

7.  Staging laparoscopy promotes increased utilization of postoperative therapy for unresectable intra-abdominal malignancies.

Authors:  V Velanovich; I Wollner; M Ajlouni
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2000 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 3.452

8.  The role of preoperative biopsy in pancreatic cancer.

Authors:  D L Clarke; B A Clarke; S R Thomson; O J Garden; N G Lazarus
Journal:  HPB (Oxford)       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 3.647

9.  Clinical implications of peritoneal cytology in potentially resectable pancreatic cancer: positive peritoneal cytology may not confer an adverse prognosis.

Authors:  Suguru Yamada; Shin Takeda; Tsutomu Fujii; Shuji Nomoto; Naohito Kanazumi; Hiroyuki Sugimoto; Hideki Kasuya; Yasuhiro Kodera; Tetsuro Nagasaka; Satoshi Morita; Akimasa Nakao
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2007-08       Impact factor: 12.969

10.  Staging of pancreatic cancer before and after neoadjuvant chemoradiation.

Authors:  R R White; E K Paulson; K S Freed; M T Keogan; H I Hurwitz; C Lee; M A Morse; M R Gottfried; J Baillie; M S Branch; P S Jowell; K M McGrath; B M Clary; T N Pappas; D S Tyler
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2001 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 3.452

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.