Literature DB >> 17119886

[Minimal residual tumor in gastrointestinal carcinoma. Relevance to prognosis and oncologic surgical consequences].

S Gretschel1, A Bembenek, T Schulze, W Kemmner, P M Schlag.   

Abstract

Isolated tumor cells as a consequence of minimal residual disease are often not detectable by routine diagnostic procedures. However, before or after surgery, isolated tumor cells in lymph nodes, the peritoneal cavity, blood, or bone marrow can frequently be identified by immunohistochemical or molecular methods. Failure to reveal the presence of such cells results in under-staging of tumor patients and may constitute the source of unexpected tumor recurrence after radical surgery. These facts emphasize the importance of isolated tumor cells at least as a surrogate marker. The frequency of appearance of isolated tumor cells in different organ systems also depends on the type of primary tumor. Developments in modern detection methods have led to increasing sensitivity but at the expense of specificity. Isolated tumor cells demonstrate remarkable heterogeneity with respect to proliferative potential and tumorigenicity. This characteristic is also reflected by a striking variability in the expression of various genes conditioning the aforementioned biological behavior. Unfortunately there is also remarkable heterogeneity in methods used for sampling and processing patient material as well as for the enrichment and detection of isolated tumor cells. Despite the ongoing controversies concerning detection methods and biological significance of isolated tumor cells, several clinical trials providing data supporting the prognostic relevance of minimal residual disease should also be considered for gastrointestinal carcinoma. In future this finding should be integrated in the planning of trials in surgical oncology, and "minimal residual disease" should receive stronger attention as a stratification criterion in such clinical studies.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 17119886     DOI: 10.1007/s00104-006-1263-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Chirurg        ISSN: 0009-4722            Impact factor:   0.955


  120 in total

1.  Lymph node micrometastases in patients with adenocarcinoma of the esophagogastric junction.

Authors:  L Bonavina; S Ferrero; V Midolo; R Buffa; B Cesana; A Peracchia
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  1999 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 3.452

2.  Identification of occult micrometastases in patients with early gastric cancer using anti-cytokeratin monoclonal antibodies.

Authors:  L Saragoni; M Gaudio; P Morgagni; S Folli; F Bazzocchi; E Scarpi; A Saragoni
Journal:  Oncol Rep       Date:  2000 May-Jun       Impact factor: 3.906

3.  Positive peritoneal cytology predicts unresectability of pancreatic adenocarcinoma.

Authors:  N B Merchant; K C Conlon; P Saigo; E Dougherty; M F Brennan
Journal:  J Am Coll Surg       Date:  1999-04       Impact factor: 6.113

4.  Comparative detection of lymph node micrometastases of stage II colorectal cancer by reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction and immunohistochemistry.

Authors:  Shingo Noura; Hirofumi Yamamoto; Tadashi Ohnishi; Norikazu Masuda; Takashi Matsumoto; Osamu Takayama; Hiroki Fukunaga; Yasuhiro Miyake; Masakazu Ikenaga; Masataka Ikeda; Mitsugu Sekimoto; Nariaki Matsuura; Morito Monden
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2002-10-15       Impact factor: 44.544

5.  Benefits of D2 lymph node dissection for patients with gastric cancer and pN0 and pN1 lymph node metastases.

Authors:  J R Siewert; R Kestlmeier; R Busch; K Böttcher; J D Roder; J Müller; C Fellbaum; H Höfler
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  1996-08       Impact factor: 6.939

6.  Disseminated tumor cells in pancreatic cancer patients detected by immunocytology: a new prognostic factor.

Authors:  I Vogel; U Krüger; J Marxsen; E Soeth; H Kalthoff; D Henne-Bruns; B Kremer; H Juhl
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  1999-03       Impact factor: 12.531

7.  Clinical significance of micrometastasis in bone marrow of patients with gastric cancer and its relation to angiogenesis.

Authors:  Yoshihiro Kakeji; Yoshihiko Maehara; Kotaro Shibahara; Shota Hasuda; Eriko Tokunaga; Eiji Oki; Keizo Sugimachi
Journal:  Gastric Cancer       Date:  1999-05       Impact factor: 7.370

8.  Benign mechanical transport of breast epithelial cells to sentinel lymph nodes.

Authors:  Nils M Diaz; Charles E Cox; Mark Ebert; John D Clark; Vesna Vrcel; Nicholas Stowell; Anu Sharma; James W Jakub; Alan Cantor; Barbara A Centeno; Elisabeth Dupont; Carlos Muro-Cacho; Santo Nicosia
Journal:  Am J Surg Pathol       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 6.394

9.  Implications of peritoneal cytology for staging of early pancreatic cancer.

Authors:  A L Warshaw
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  1991-01       Impact factor: 2.565

10.  Detection of lymphatic micrometastases in patients with stages I and II colorectal cancer: impact on five-year survival.

Authors:  Udo Kronberg; Francisco López-Kostner; Gonzalo Soto; Alvaro Zúñiga; Ignacio Wistuba; Vanessa Miranda; Eliana Pinto; Paola Viviani; Guillermo Marshall
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  2004-05-28       Impact factor: 4.585

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.