Literature DB >> 9563745

Quality assessment of protected specimen brush samples by microscopic cell count.

A H Mertens1, J M Nagler, D I Galdermans, H R Slabbynck, B Weise, D Coolen.   

Abstract

Protected specimen brushing (PSB), combined with quantitative culture, is now recognized as one of the reference methods for diagnosis of nosocomial pneumonia. However, no criteria exist with which to assess the quality of the PSB sample. We studied numbers of inflammatory cells and bronchial cells per microscopic field (magnification: x500, objective x50) in cytospin preparations of PSB samples. Results of cell count and quantitative culture in a first study period were compared with those in a second study period, following adaptation of the PSB technique and collection of samples from more peripheral sites. The cellular content of samples from patients and controls was investigated. We examined 86 samples from patients with suspected nosocomial pneumonia and 15 samples from uninfected controls. The number of samples with a high cellular content was considerably greater in the second study period. No positive cultures were obtained from samples containing < 10 cells per field. The numbers of cells in samples from uninfected controls were comparable to the numbers in samples from patients. Our results indicate that absence of cells probably represents inadequate sampling. Negative PSB cultures with cytospin preparations containing < 10 cells per microscopic field should therefore be considered with caution, and resampling considered.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9563745     DOI: 10.1164/ajrccm.157.4.9709082

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Respir Crit Care Med        ISSN: 1073-449X            Impact factor:   21.405


  7 in total

1.  Accuracy and precision of quantitative calibrated loops in transfer of bronchoalveolar lavage fluid.

Authors:  J A Jacobs; E I De Brauwer; E I Cornelissen; M Drent
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2000-06       Impact factor: 5.948

2.  Nosocomial Pneumonia: More Than Just Ventilator-Associated.

Authors:  Joseph R. Lentino
Journal:  Curr Infect Dis Rep       Date:  2001-06       Impact factor: 3.725

Review 3.  Laboratory diagnosis of lower respiratory tract infections: controversy and conundrums.

Authors:  Karen C Carroll
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2002-09       Impact factor: 5.948

4.  Ventilator-associated pneumonia: diagnosis, treatment, and prevention.

Authors:  Steven M Koenig; Jonathon D Truwit
Journal:  Clin Microbiol Rev       Date:  2006-10       Impact factor: 26.132

5.  Blind and bronchoscopic sampling methods in suspected ventilator-associated pneumonia. A multicentre prospective study.

Authors:  Hervé Mentec; Laetitia May-Michelangeli; Antoine Rabbat; Emmanuelle Varon; Françoise Le Turdu; Gérard Bleichner
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2004-04-20       Impact factor: 17.440

Review 6.  Ventilator-associated pneumonia or not? Contemporary diagnosis.

Authors:  C G Mayhall
Journal:  Emerg Infect Dis       Date:  2001 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 6.883

Review 7.  Which Current and Novel Diagnostic Avenues for Bacterial Respiratory Diseases?

Authors:  Héloïse Rytter; Anne Jamet; Mathieu Coureuil; Alain Charbit; Elodie Ramond
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2020-12-10       Impact factor: 5.640

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.