Literature DB >> 9563589

Indications and limitations of three-dimensional models in cranio-maxillofacial surgery.

G Santler1, H Kärcher, C Ruda.   

Abstract

Anatomical, life-like, three-dimensional (3D) models have a definite place in cranio-maxillofacial surgery. Our experience with 541 computer tomography (CT)-based 3D models employed in aiding corrective surgery of tumours, dysgnathia, traumatology, alveolar atrophy, congenital malformation and asymmetrical malformations in our department is discussed. From July 1988 to February 1997, 3D models of 346 patients were used. Most of these were produced at our clinic. The indications, advantages and limitations of 3D-models were analysed retrospectively. In the case of congenital malformations (n = 60), models facilitated precise diagnosis of the skeletal deformity. Simulation surgery allowed prediction and solution of intraoperative problems prior to the actual patient operation. Size, shape and localization of defects caused by trauma (n = 64), osteoradionecrosis (n = 17) or osteomyelitis (n = 2) determined the choice of transplant donor site. In patients suffering from dysgnathia (n = 144), 3D models enabled exact positioning of the jaws. Precise planning could only be accomplished with the help of 3D models, especially for asymmetrical malformations (n = 12). In cases of severe atrophy of the alveolar crest (n = 45), exact measurement of the bone was possible and facilitated the decision as to whether dental implants, bone transplants or a combination of these were indicated. The positioning of transplants and implants was carried out in the ideal relation to the opposite jaw. In tumour patients (n = 186), it is not always possible to identify the tumour borders precisely on the CT scan or 3D model. Therefore, the defect was assumed to be bigger, a longer bridging plate constructed and this measurement corrected according to the intraoperative situation. The advantage of the 3D models consisted of an accurate representation of anatomical structures, bone or soft tissue. This allows precise preoperative diagnosis, operation planning and model operations. Due to this, the correct approach as well as operation technique could be chosen, outcomes of constant high quality were achieved, and there was a reduction in operation time.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9563589     DOI: 10.1016/s1010-5182(98)80029-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Craniomaxillofac Surg        ISSN: 1010-5182            Impact factor:   2.078


  14 in total

1.  Application of virtual surgical planning with computer assisted design and manufacturing technology to cranio-maxillofacial surgery.

Authors:  Linping Zhao; Pravin K Patel; Mimis Cohen
Journal:  Arch Plast Surg       Date:  2012-07-13

2.  Development of a simulation system in mandibular orthognathic surgery based on integrated three-dimensional data.

Authors:  Yoshihide Mori; Hidetaka Shimizu; Katsuhiro Minami; Tae-Geon Kwon; Takamitsu Mano
Journal:  Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2010-10-28

Review 3.  [Reconstructive orbital surgery].

Authors:  M E H Wagner; H Essig; M Rücker; T Gander
Journal:  HNO       Date:  2018-11       Impact factor: 1.284

4.  Biomechanical response of the maxillofacial skeleton to transpalatal orthopedic force in a unilateral palatal cleft.

Authors:  Pawan Gautam; Linping Zhao; Pravin Patel
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2011-02-07       Impact factor: 2.079

5.  Determining the osteotomy pattern in surgically assisted rapid maxillary expansion in a unilateral palatal cleft: a finite element model approach.

Authors:  Pawan Gautam; Linping Zhao; Pravin Patel
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2011-02-07       Impact factor: 2.079

6.  3D Models Revolutionizing Surgical Outcomes in Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery: Experience at Our Center.

Authors:  Nancy Mathew; Sumir Gandhi; Inderjot Singh; Manisha Solanki; Navpreet Singh Bedi
Journal:  J Maxillofac Oral Surg       Date:  2019-08-17

7.  The Application of Pre-operative Three-Dimensional Models in the Management of Mandibular Pathology: Is it Really Useful? An Institutional Study.

Authors:  Sanjay Kumar Roy Chowdhury; Arunkumar Shadamarshan Rengasayee; Rajkumar Krishnaprabhu
Journal:  J Maxillofac Oral Surg       Date:  2020-10-16

8.  Dimensional Error in Rapid Prototyping with Open Source Software and Low-cost 3D-printer.

Authors:  Marco A Rendón-Medina; Laura Andrade-Delgado; Jose E Telich-Tarriba; Antonio Fuente-Del-Campo; Carlos A Altamirano-Arcos
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open       Date:  2018-01-25

9.  A 3-Dimensional-Printed Short-Segment Template Prototype for Mandibular Fracture Repair.

Authors:  Parul Sinha; Gary Skolnick; Kamlesh B Patel; Gregory H Branham; John J Chi
Journal:  JAMA Facial Plast Surg       Date:  2018-09-01       Impact factor: 4.611

10.  Evolution of photography in maxillofacial surgery: from analog to 3D photography - an overview.

Authors:  Heidrun Schaaf; Christoph Yves Malik; Hans-Peter Howaldt; Philipp Streckbein
Journal:  Clin Cosmet Investig Dent       Date:  2009-09-30
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.