Literature DB >> 30327822

[Reconstructive orbital surgery].

M E H Wagner1, H Essig2, M Rücker2, T Gander2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: In complex orbital reconstructions ideal positioning of the bony buttress and surrounding soft tissue is a prerequisite for an aesthetic and functional result. The use of computer-assisted surgery can support the surgeon before and during the reconstruction procedure and facilitate quality control processes. This is illustrated using three clinical examples.
MATERIAL AND METHODS: The areas of interest (bony defect areas, surrounding tissues) are segmented in a 3D image series. In most cases, the contralateral non-affected side can serve as the reference in virtual reconstruction. The virtual model obtained can now be used for the manufacturing of patient specific models and implants, as well as for intraoperative navigation or direct quality control with the use of intraoperative cone beam computed tomography (CBCT).
RESULTS: For the reconstruction of primary and secondary traumatic defects as well as for congenital malformations or neoplastic diseases, the presented workflow can be used. Preoperative virtual visualization, patient specific reconstruction and direct quality control using intraoperative CBCT ensure that the preoperatively planned result can be achieved. Together with the interplay of hard and soft tissue the best possible results can be achieved.
CONCLUSION: Computer-assisted surgery has been continuously further developed over the last two decades and is currently used in the clinical routine. Patient specific implants in combination with the use of direct intraoperative quality control facilitate the reconstruction of complex orbital injuries and defects and enable the ideal reconstruction from both aesthetic and functional aspects.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Computer-assisted surgery; Intraoperative X-rays; Patient-specific implant; Quality control; Titanium

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30327822     DOI: 10.1007/s00106-018-0568-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  HNO        ISSN: 0017-6192            Impact factor:   1.284


  21 in total

Review 1.  Use of nonresorbable alloplastic implants for internal orbital reconstruction.

Authors:  Edward Ellis; Elias Messo
Journal:  J Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2004-07       Impact factor: 1.895

2.  Development and first clinical application of automated virtual reconstruction of unilateral midface defects.

Authors:  Maximilian Eberhard Hermann Wagner; Jürgen Thomas Lichtenstein; Marcel Winkelmann; Hoen-Oh Shin; Nils-Claudius Gellrich; Harald Essig
Journal:  J Craniomaxillofac Surg       Date:  2015-07-03       Impact factor: 2.078

3.  Navigational maxillofacial surgery using virtual models.

Authors:  B Hohlweg-Majert; Ralf Schön; Rainer Schmelzeisen; Nils-Claudius Gellrich; Alexander Schramm
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2005-12       Impact factor: 3.352

4.  Design and development of a virtual anatomic atlas of the human skull for automatic segmentation in computer-assisted surgery, preoperative planning, and navigation.

Authors:  M C Metzger; G Bittermann; L Dannenberg; R Schmelzeisen; N-C Gellrich; B Hohlweg-Majert; C Scheifele
Journal:  Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg       Date:  2013-02-17       Impact factor: 2.924

5.  Indications and limitations of three-dimensional models in cranio-maxillofacial surgery.

Authors:  G Santler; H Kärcher; C Ruda
Journal:  J Craniomaxillofac Surg       Date:  1998-02       Impact factor: 2.078

6.  3D-Printed Simulation Device for Orbital Surgery.

Authors:  Juergen Thomas Lichtenstein; Alexander Nicolai Zeller; Juliana Lemound; Thorsten Enno Lichtenstein; Majeed Rana; Nils-Claudius Gellrich; Maximilian Eberhard Wagner
Journal:  J Surg Educ       Date:  2016-12-13       Impact factor: 2.891

7.  Use of a monopolar microneedle device in a transconjunctival, retroseptal approach.

Authors:  Thomas Gander; Claudio Rostetter; Michael Blumer; Maximilian Wagner; Paul Schumann; Daniel B Wiedemeier; Martin Rücker; Harald Essig
Journal:  J Craniomaxillofac Surg       Date:  2017-09-30       Impact factor: 2.078

8.  Virtual 3D tumor marking-exact intraoperative coordinate mapping improve post-operative radiotherapy.

Authors:  Harald Essig; Majeed Rana; Andreas Meyer; André M Eckardt; Horst Kokemueller; Constantin von See; Daniel Lindhorst; Frank Tavassol; Martin Ruecker; Nils-Claudius Gellrich
Journal:  Radiat Oncol       Date:  2011-11-16       Impact factor: 3.481

9.  Patient specific implants (PSI) in reconstruction of orbital floor and wall fractures.

Authors:  Thomas Gander; Harald Essig; Philipp Metzler; Daniel Lindhorst; Leander Dubois; Martin Rücker; Paul Schumann
Journal:  J Craniomaxillofac Surg       Date:  2014-10-31       Impact factor: 2.078

10.  A prospective multicenter study to compare the precision of posttraumatic internal orbital reconstruction with standard preformed and individualized orbital implants.

Authors:  Rüdiger M Zimmerer; Edward Ellis; Gregorio Sanchez Aniceto; Alexander Schramm; Maximilian E H Wagner; Michael P Grant; Carl-Peter Cornelius; Edward Bradley Strong; Majeed Rana; Lim Thiam Chye; Alvaro Rivero Calle; Frank Wilde; Daniel Perez; Frank Tavassol; Gido Bittermann; Nicholas R Mahoney; Marta Redondo Alamillos; Joanna Bašić; Jan Dittmann; Michael Rasse; Nils-Claudius Gellrich
Journal:  J Craniomaxillofac Surg       Date:  2016-07-21       Impact factor: 2.078

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.