Literature DB >> 9562402

Computer mouse position as a determinant of posture, muscular load and perceived exertion.

L K Karlqvist1, E Bernmark, L Ekenvall, M Hagberg, A Isaksson, T Rostö.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: This study concerned the influence of 6 positions of the computer mouse on the work table on posture, muscular load, and perceived exertion during text editing.
METHODS: An optoelectronic 3-dimensional motion analysis system was used to register the postures of 10 men and 10 women using video display units. Muscular load was also registered (with electromyography), as was perceived exertion (with rating scales).
RESULTS: A neutral posture with a relaxed and supported arm showed the least perceived exertion, and the electromyographic results showed low activity in both trapezius muscles in this position. Short operators (all women) showed a numerically higher activity in the 4 examined muscles than the tall operators (all men, except 1). This finding could be related to lower muscle force among women and to anthropometric differences, which also influence biomechanic load moments. Narrow-shouldered operators (8 women and 1 man) and short operators worked with larger outward rotation and abduction of the shoulder in a position of the mouse lateral to the keyboard than the broad-shouldered (7 men and 2 women) and tall operators did. Arm support markedly reduced muscle load in the neck-shoulder region among the operators.
CONCLUSIONS: The operators using video display units in this study preferred to use the mouse on a table in a close to relaxed, neutral posture of the arm in combination with arm support. Short and narrow-shouldered operators worked in more strenuous postures of the arm when the mouse was located lateral to the keyboard.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9562402     DOI: 10.5271/sjweh.279

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Scand J Work Environ Health        ISSN: 0355-3140            Impact factor:   5.024


  12 in total

1.  Work related and individual predictors for incident neck pain among office employees working with video display units.

Authors:  T Korhonen; R Ketola; R Toivonen; R Luukkonen; M Häkkänen; E Viikari-Juntura
Journal:  Occup Environ Med       Date:  2003-07       Impact factor: 4.402

2.  The relative contribution of work exposure, leisure time exposure, and individual characteristics in the onset of arm-wrist-hand and neck-shoulder symptoms among office workers.

Authors:  Maaike A Huysmans; Stefan Ijmker; Birgitte M Blatter; Dirk L Knol; Willem van Mechelen; Paulien M Bongers; Allard J van der Beek
Journal:  Int Arch Occup Environ Health       Date:  2011-10-29       Impact factor: 3.015

3.  Physical exposure of sign language interpreters: baseline measures and reliability analysis.

Authors:  Alain Delisle; Christian Larivière; Daniel Imbeau; Marie-José Durand
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2005-04-14       Impact factor: 3.078

4.  Multivariate, longitudinal analysis of the impact of changes in office work environments on surface electromyography measures.

Authors:  D C Cole; C Chen; S Hogg-Johnson; D Van Eerd; A Mazumder; R P Wells
Journal:  Int Arch Occup Environ Health       Date:  2011-09-01       Impact factor: 3.015

5.  The weight of computer mouse affects the wrist motion and forearm muscle activity during fast operation speed task.

Authors:  Han-Ming Chen; Chang-Sian Lee; Chih-Hsiu Cheng
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2011-10-12       Impact factor: 3.078

6.  Epidemiological study to investigate potential interaction between physical and psychosocial factors at work that may increase the risk of symptoms of musculoskeletal disorder of the neck and upper limb.

Authors:  J J Devereux; I G Vlachonikolis; P W Buckle
Journal:  Occup Environ Med       Date:  2002-04       Impact factor: 4.402

7.  Muscle activity during computer-based office work in relation to self-reported job demands and gender.

Authors:  Anne Katrine Blangsted; Klaus Hansen; Chris Jensen
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2003-03-25       Impact factor: 3.078

8.  Developing a framework for predicting upper extremity muscle activities, postures, velocities, and accelerations during computer use: the effect of keyboard use, mouse use, and individual factors on physical exposures.

Authors:  Jennifer L Bruno Garza; Paul J Catalano; Jeffrey N Katz; Maaike A Huysmans; Jack T Dennerlein
Journal:  J Occup Environ Hyg       Date:  2012       Impact factor: 2.155

Review 9.  Computer work and musculoskeletal disorders of the neck and upper extremity: a systematic review.

Authors:  Morten Waersted; Therese N Hanvold; Kaj Bo Veiersted
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2010-04-29       Impact factor: 2.362

10.  Software-recorded and self-reported duration of computer use in relation to the onset of severe arm-wrist-hand pain and neck-shoulder pain.

Authors:  Stefan Ijmker; Maaike A Huysmans; Allard J van der Beek; Dirk L Knol; Willem van Mechelen; Paulien M Bongers; Birgitte M Blatter
Journal:  Occup Environ Med       Date:  2010-11-02       Impact factor: 4.402

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.