Literature DB >> 23066993

Developing a framework for predicting upper extremity muscle activities, postures, velocities, and accelerations during computer use: the effect of keyboard use, mouse use, and individual factors on physical exposures.

Jennifer L Bruno Garza1, Paul J Catalano, Jeffrey N Katz, Maaike A Huysmans, Jack T Dennerlein.   

Abstract

Prediction models were developed based on keyboard and mouse use in combination with individual factors that could be used to predict median upper extremity muscle activities, postures, velocities, and accelerations experienced during computer use. In the laboratory, 25 participants performed five simulated computer trials with different amounts of keyboard and mouse use ranging from a highly keyboard-intensive trial to a highly mouse-intensive trial. During each trial, muscle activity and postures of the shoulder and wrist and velocities and accelerations of the wrists, along with percentage keyboard and mouse use, were measured. Four individual factors (hand length, shoulder width, age, and gender) were also measured on the day of data collection. Percentage keyboard and mouse use explained a large amount of the variability in wrist velocities and accelerations. Although hand length, shoulder width, and age were each significant predictors of at least one median muscle activity, posture, velocity, or acceleration exposure, these individual factors explained very little variability in addition to percentage keyboard and mouse use in any of the physical exposures investigated. The amounts of variability explained for models predicting median wrist velocities and accelerations ranged from 75 to 84% but were much lower for median muscle activities and postures (0-50%). RMS errors ranged between 8 to 13% of the range observed. While the predictions for wrist velocities and accelerations may be able to be used to improve exposure assessment for future epidemiologic studies, more research is needed to identify other factors that may improve the predictions for muscle activities and postures.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23066993      PMCID: PMC3486439          DOI: 10.1080/15459624.2012.728927

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Occup Environ Hyg        ISSN: 1545-9624            Impact factor:   2.155


  22 in total

1.  Shoulder muscle activity in young and older people during a computer mouse task.

Authors:  B Laursen; B R Jensen
Journal:  Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon)       Date:  2000       Impact factor: 2.063

2.  Comparison of measurement accuracy between two types of wrist goniometer systems.

Authors:  P Jonsson; P W Johnson
Journal:  Appl Ergon       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 3.661

3.  Evaluation of three methodologies for assessing work activity during computer use.

Authors:  Michelle M Homan; Thomas J Armstrong
Journal:  AIHA J (Fairfax, Va)       Date:  2003 Jan-Feb

4.  Using exposure prediction rules for exposure assessment: an example on whole-body vibration in taxi drivers.

Authors:  Jiu-Chiuan Chen; Wen-Ruey Chang; Tung-Sheng Shih; Chiou-Jong Chen; Wushou P Chang; Jack T Dennerlein; Louise M Ryan; David C Christiani
Journal:  Epidemiology       Date:  2004-05       Impact factor: 4.822

5.  Observed differences in upper extremity forces, muscle efforts, postures, velocities and accelerations across computer activities in a field study of office workers.

Authors:  J L Bruno Garza; B H W Eijckelhof; P W Johnson; S M Raina; P W Rynell; M A Huysmans; J H van Dieën; A J van der Beek; B M Blatter; J T Dennerlein
Journal:  Ergonomics       Date:  2012-03-29       Impact factor: 2.778

6.  Task-based estimation of mechanical job exposure in occupational groups.

Authors:  Svend Erik Mathiassen; Catarina Nordander; Susanne W Svendsen; Helen M Wellman; Patrick G Dempsey
Journal:  Scand J Work Environ Health       Date:  2005-04       Impact factor: 5.024

7.  Computer mouse position as a determinant of posture, muscular load and perceived exertion.

Authors:  L K Karlqvist; E Bernmark; L Ekenvall; M Hagberg; A Isaksson; T Rostö
Journal:  Scand J Work Environ Health       Date:  1998-02       Impact factor: 5.024

Review 8.  Pathophysiology of upper extremity muscle disorders.

Authors:  Bart Visser; Jaap H van Dieën
Journal:  J Electromyogr Kinesiol       Date:  2005-08-15       Impact factor: 2.368

9.  Estimation of muscle forces about the wrist joint during isometric tasks using an EMG coefficient method.

Authors:  T S Buchanan; M J Moniz; J P Dewald; W Zev Rymer
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  1993 Apr-May       Impact factor: 2.712

Review 10.  Assessment of physical work load in epidemiologic studies: concepts, issues and operational considerations.

Authors:  J Winkel; S E Mathiassen
Journal:  Ergonomics       Date:  1994-06       Impact factor: 2.778

View more
  1 in total

1.  Prediction of trapezius muscle activity and shoulder, head, neck, and torso postures during computer use: results of a field study.

Authors:  Jennifer L Bruno Garza; Belinda H W Eijckelhof; Maaike A Huysmans; Peter W Johnson; Jaap H van Dieen; Paul J Catalano; Jeffrey N Katz; Allard J van der Beek; Jack T Dennerlein
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2014-09-03       Impact factor: 2.362

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.